Los árbitros y las recusaciones: Mejores prácticas para evitar recusaciones en Perú

• Autor: Herrada Sánchez, Tatiana
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/206909
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/33407/28632; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206909; https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202502.009
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Challenge of arbitrators; Impartiality; Independence; International Arbitration; Public Procurement; Recusación de árbitros; Imparcialidad; Independencia; Arbitraje Internacional; Contratación Estatal; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00

This article identifies the main grounds for challenging arbitrators in Peru, particularly in arbitration proceedings related to public procurement. It analyzes national legislation, the rules of the most relevant arbitral institutions, and applicable international standards. The author compares Peruvian regulations with international practices and highlights the obligations arbitrators must fulfill regarding disclosure, impartiality, and independence. Based on this analysis, the article offers practical recommendations that help reduce the risk of challenges, strengthen procedural transparency, and protect the stability of the tribunal. The article also addresses corruption as a ground for challenge, considering the risk indicators defined by the ICC at the international level and the regulatory reforms adopted in Peru. It concludes that arbitrators must anticipate potential conflicts, disclose relevant connections, and act with integrity and professionalism throughout the arbitration. When arbitrators prevent challenges, they protect not only their own appointment but also the legitimacy of arbitration as an effective dispute resolution mechanism.