La posibilidad de un pensamiento práctico en Marion a partir de la estima cartesiana

• Autor: Murga, Ezequiel D.
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/200662
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/29308/26584; https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.202401.006
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Marion; Esteem; Prudence; Hermeneutics; Phenomenology; Estima; Prudencia; Hermenéutica; Fenomenología; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01

According to Jean-Luc Marion, the subject is responsible for the phenomenalization of the given. This process—characterized as “hermeneutic” by the author—implies a discrimination concerning which is the most adequate way to show the phenomenon. For this to be possible, however, a modality of thought which does not deal with objects but with events is needed. This paper argues that this modality—suitable for deciding the way of phenomenalization of the given—can be found in practical thought. Firstly, I trace back this possibility to the Cartesian esteem. Secondly, I discuss it with reference to the Aristotelian prudence. Finally, I relate both approaches to comprehension (Verstehen), a concept that Marion picks up from Heidegger and Gadamer.