Evaluation of the bond strength of different intraradicular posts in endodontically treated teeth
Descripción del Articulo
Objectives: The reconstruction of endodontically treated teeth with significant coronal destruction often requires the use of posts. This study evaluated the bond strength of four intraradicular post systems in different root regions using a push-out test: conventional fiberglass, CAD/CAM fiberglass...
Autores: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3253 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/3253 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Dental Pins; Resin Cements; Post and Core Technique; CAD/CAM; Endodontics Pins Dentales; Cementos de Resina; Técnica de Perno Muñón; CAD-CAM; Endodoncia |
Sumario: | Objectives: The reconstruction of endodontically treated teeth with significant coronal destruction often requires the use of posts. This study evaluated the bond strength of four intraradicular post systems in different root regions using a push-out test: conventional fiberglass, CAD/CAM fiberglass, Splendor SAP, and anatomical posts. Materials and Methods: Nineteen single-rooted premolars were treated endodontically and divided into four groups. The posts were cemented with dual self-adhesive resin cement and then sectioned into 1 mm slices for push-out testing. Results: The cervical region had a higher bond strength than middle and apical thirds. Conventional fiberglass posts presented higher resistance than anatomical posts (p=0.048). Conclusions: These results confirm that cervical thirds present the best bonding conditions and that conventional fiberglass posts outperform the anatomical ones. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).