APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS

Descripción del Articulo

This paper shows that judges often impose limitations on the use of leading questions in cross-examination during oral trials. In this sense, considering that conceptual and substantiation gaps have an unquestionable impact on the protection of human rights, the authors specify in this documentary r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: García Curiel, Karen Dalina, Sotelo Torres, Claudio Renato, Espinoza Ramos, Benji, Sánchez Chávez, Sayuri
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3338
Enlace del recurso:https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUSMP_5c07fbe290950b1a4e513c89f1934e78
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3338
network_acronym_str REVUSMP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
repository_id_str
spelling APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGSAPROXIMACIONES SOBRE EL DERECHO A INTERROGAR Y CONTRAINTERROGAR: EL USO DE PREGUNTAS SUGESTIVAS EN EL JUICIO ORALGarcía Curiel, Karen DalinaSotelo Torres, Claudio RenatoEspinoza Ramos, BenjiSánchez Chávez, SayuriThis paper shows that judges often impose limitations on the use of leading questions in cross-examination during oral trials. In this sense, considering that conceptual and substantiation gaps have an unquestionable impact on the protection of human rights, the authors specify in this documentary research the inherent aspects of the concept and foundation of the right to examine and cross-examine to prevent the vagueness of these elements from causing this right to be unprotected.El presente trabajo pone en evidencia que, con frecuencia, los juzgadores imponen limitaciones al empleo de preguntas sugestivas en el contrainterrogatorio durante el juicio oral. En este sentido, tomando en cuenta que los vacíos conceptuales y de fundamentación tienen un incuestionable impacto en la protección de los derechos humanos, los autores precisan en esta investigación documental los aspectos inherentes del concepto y fundamento del derecho a interrogar y contrainterrogar para prevenir que la vaguedad de estos elementos ocasione la desprotección de este derecho.Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres2025-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338Vox Juris; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2026); 137-146Vox Juris; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2026); 137-1462521-52801812-6804reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338/4092https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338/4093Derechos de autor 2025 Karen Dalina García Curiel, Claudio Renato Sotelo Torres, Benji Espinoza Ramos, Sayuri Sánchez Chávezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/33382025-12-05T16:19:32Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
APROXIMACIONES SOBRE EL DERECHO A INTERROGAR Y CONTRAINTERROGAR: EL USO DE PREGUNTAS SUGESTIVAS EN EL JUICIO ORAL
title APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
spellingShingle APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
García Curiel, Karen Dalina
title_short APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
title_full APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
title_fullStr APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
title_full_unstemmed APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
title_sort APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv García Curiel, Karen Dalina
Sotelo Torres, Claudio Renato
Espinoza Ramos, Benji
Sánchez Chávez, Sayuri
author García Curiel, Karen Dalina
author_facet García Curiel, Karen Dalina
Sotelo Torres, Claudio Renato
Espinoza Ramos, Benji
Sánchez Chávez, Sayuri
author_role author
author2 Sotelo Torres, Claudio Renato
Espinoza Ramos, Benji
Sánchez Chávez, Sayuri
author2_role author
author
author
description This paper shows that judges often impose limitations on the use of leading questions in cross-examination during oral trials. In this sense, considering that conceptual and substantiation gaps have an unquestionable impact on the protection of human rights, the authors specify in this documentary research the inherent aspects of the concept and foundation of the right to examine and cross-examine to prevent the vagueness of these elements from causing this right to be unprotected.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338
url https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338/4092
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3338/4093
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Vox Juris; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2026); 137-146
Vox Juris; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2026); 137-146
2521-5280
1812-6804
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
collection Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853224913844830208
score 13.953983
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).