THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS
Descripción del Articulo
The article analyzes how family structures in Peru have evolved and how Article 495 of the Civil Code does not adequately reflect this diversity. Currently, only 21.8% of family units in Peru correspond to the traditional family, while 61.4% adopt other forms, such as single-parent, same-sex, and bl...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3062 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVUSMP_127d4f1db7b48b81d7ffc485091e879f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3062 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUSMP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDSLA NECESIDAD DE REFORMAR LA LEGISLACIÓN DE PATRIMONIO FAMILIAR EN PERÚ: HACIA UNA INCLUSIÓN DE LOS HOGARES UNIPERSONALESMendoza Vásquez, Enrique The article analyzes how family structures in Peru have evolved and how Article 495 of the Civil Code does not adequately reflect this diversity. Currently, only 21.8% of family units in Peru correspond to the traditional family, while 61.4% adopt other forms, such as single-parent, same-sex, and blended families, and the current legislation remains focused onprotecting only traditional family units,excluding those who do not fit this model.The analysis of the Registry Court’s resolutions shows that Peruvian legislation maintains a strict interpretation, excluding those without a spouse or dependent children from patrimonial protection. Although there has been some flexibility since 2013, these decisions have not effectively addressed the lack of protection for single-person households, leading to legal uncertainty.The article compares Peruvian legislation with that of Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil, where more inclusive approaches have been adopted to protect individuals withouttraditional family ties. These legislationsreflect better adaptation to contemporary social realities.The conclusion highlights the urgent need to reform the Peruvian Civil Code to include and adequately protect all family configurations, ensuring equitable access to patrimonialprotection and aligning with the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in human rights.El artículo analiza cómo las estructuras familiares en Perú han evolucionado y cómo el artículo 495 del Código Civil no refleja adecuadamente esta diversidad. Actualmente, solo el 21.8% de las unidades familiares en Perú corresponde a la familia tradicional, amientras que el 61.4% adopta otras formas, como monoparentales, homoparentales y reconstituidas, y el 16.8% son hogares unipersonales. Sin embargo, la legislación vigente sigue enfocada en proteger únicamente a las unidades familiares tradicionales, excluyendo a quienes no encajan en este modelo. El análisis de las resoluciones del Tribunal Registral muestra que la legislación peruana mantiene una interpretación estricta, excluyendo a los constituyentes sin cónyuge o hijos dependientes de la protección patrimonial. Aunque ha habido cierta flexibilización desde 2013, estas decisiones no han resuelto de manera efectiva la falta de protección para los hogares unipersonales, lo que genera inseguridad jurídica.El artículo compara la legislación peruana con la de México, Colombia, Argentina y Brasil, donde se han adoptado enfoques más inclusivos para proteger a individuos sin lazos familiares tradicionales. Estas legislaciones reflejan una mejor adaptación a las realidades sociales contemporáneas.La conclusión destaca la necesidad urgente de reformar el Código Civil peruano para incluir y proteger adecuadamente todas las configuraciones familiares, asegurando un acceso equitativo a la protección patrimonial y alineándose con los principios de igualdad y no discriminación consagrados en los derechos humanos.Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres2025-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062Vox Juris; Vol. 43 No. 2 (2025); 45 - 62Vox Juris; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 (2025); 45 - 622521-52801812-6804reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062/3837https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062/3838Derechos de autor 2025 Enrique Mendoza Vásquezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/30622025-08-14T19:56:25Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS LA NECESIDAD DE REFORMAR LA LEGISLACIÓN DE PATRIMONIO FAMILIAR EN PERÚ: HACIA UNA INCLUSIÓN DE LOS HOGARES UNIPERSONALES |
| title |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| spellingShingle |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS Mendoza Vásquez, Enrique |
| title_short |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| title_full |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| title_fullStr |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| title_full_unstemmed |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| title_sort |
THE NEED TO REFORM FAMILY PROPERTY LEGISLATION IN PERU: TOWARD THE INCLUSION OF SINGLE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mendoza Vásquez, Enrique |
| author |
Mendoza Vásquez, Enrique |
| author_facet |
Mendoza Vásquez, Enrique |
| author_role |
author |
| description |
The article analyzes how family structures in Peru have evolved and how Article 495 of the Civil Code does not adequately reflect this diversity. Currently, only 21.8% of family units in Peru correspond to the traditional family, while 61.4% adopt other forms, such as single-parent, same-sex, and blended families, and the current legislation remains focused onprotecting only traditional family units,excluding those who do not fit this model.The analysis of the Registry Court’s resolutions shows that Peruvian legislation maintains a strict interpretation, excluding those without a spouse or dependent children from patrimonial protection. Although there has been some flexibility since 2013, these decisions have not effectively addressed the lack of protection for single-person households, leading to legal uncertainty.The article compares Peruvian legislation with that of Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil, where more inclusive approaches have been adopted to protect individuals withouttraditional family ties. These legislationsreflect better adaptation to contemporary social realities.The conclusion highlights the urgent need to reform the Peruvian Civil Code to include and adequately protect all family configurations, ensuring equitable access to patrimonialprotection and aligning with the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in human rights. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062 |
| url |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062/3837 https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/3062/3838 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2025 Enrique Mendoza Vásquez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2025 Enrique Mendoza Vásquez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Vox Juris; Vol. 43 No. 2 (2025); 45 - 62 Vox Juris; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 (2025); 45 - 62 2521-5280 1812-6804 reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres instacron:USMP |
| instname_str |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| instacron_str |
USMP |
| institution |
USMP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846883125959852032 |
| score |
12.798618 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).