Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP
Descripción del Articulo
The constant evolution of dental ceramics has led to the appearance of hybrid ceramics or also called PICN. However, these new materials require new adhesives and cementation techniques. Materials and Methods: Five VITA ENAMIC blocks were sectioned into sheets (12 x 14 x 1.5 mm), and their surfac...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/2472 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Dental Adhesion Ceramic Universal Adhesive Microshear Bond Strength. Adhesión Dental Cerámica Adhesivo Universal Resistencia al Corte |
id |
REVUSMP_0d17b0696f90a0c514f849ed03b52fe9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/2472 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUSMP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP Comparación de la fuerza de adhesión entre una cerámica híbrida y un adhesivo convencional vs uno a base de 10 MDP |
title |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP Cascante Calderón, Marcelo Dental Adhesion Ceramic Universal Adhesive Microshear Bond Strength. Adhesión Dental Cerámica Adhesivo Universal Resistencia al Corte |
title_short |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
title_full |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
title_sort |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cascante Calderón, Marcelo Barros Pilamunga, David Villacís Altamirano, Inés María |
author |
Cascante Calderón, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Cascante Calderón, Marcelo Barros Pilamunga, David Villacís Altamirano, Inés María |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barros Pilamunga, David Villacís Altamirano, Inés María |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Adhesion Ceramic Universal Adhesive Microshear Bond Strength. Adhesión Dental Cerámica Adhesivo Universal Resistencia al Corte |
topic |
Dental Adhesion Ceramic Universal Adhesive Microshear Bond Strength. Adhesión Dental Cerámica Adhesivo Universal Resistencia al Corte |
description |
The constant evolution of dental ceramics has led to the appearance of hybrid ceramics or also called PICN. However, these new materials require new adhesives and cementation techniques. Materials and Methods: Five VITA ENAMIC blocks were sectioned into sheets (12 x 14 x 1.5 mm), and their surfaces were treated by acid etching and sandblasting (50 µ Al2O4), then randomly divided into two groups according to the type of adhesive: conventional adhesive group (GAC, n = 30) and universal adhesive group (GAU, n = 30). In addition to this, 60 microtubes were made with resin; each of them was cemented with the same cement, on each of the ceramic sheets. After this procedure, they were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 hours. Each microtube was then peeled off by micro-shearing. And the bond strength (RU) was measured in MPa. Statistical analysis was performed with a Student's t test. Statistical significance was 0.05 and confidence was 95%. Results: The RU of the universal adhesive (36.94 MPa) were higher than the conventional one (32.76 MPa). Student's t showed that there was a difference between the groups. p = 0.009 Conclusions: RU on hybrid ceramic was better when the universal adhesive was used. Attempting to use a conventional adhesive plus a previously applied silane did not result in an improvement in bond strengths. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472/2956 https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472/Comparaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20fuerza%20de%20adhesi%C3%B3n%20entre%20una%20cer%C3%A1mica%20h%C3%ADbrida%20y%20un%20adhesivo%20convencional%20vs%20uno%20a%20base%20de%2010%20MDP |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista KIRU info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista KIRU |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Facultad de Odontología. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Facultad de Odontología. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
KIRU ; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022): KIRU (ABRIL-JUNIO) KIRU ISSN (Impreso): 1812 - 7886 ISSN (Digital): 2410-2717; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2022): KIRU (ABRIL-JUNIO) 2410-2717 1812-7886 reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres instacron:USMP |
instname_str |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
instacron_str |
USMP |
institution |
USMP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1841809802872750080 |
spelling |
Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDPComparación de la fuerza de adhesión entre una cerámica híbrida y un adhesivo convencional vs uno a base de 10 MDPCascante Calderón, MarceloBarros Pilamunga, DavidVillacís Altamirano, Inés MaríaDental AdhesionCeramicUniversal AdhesiveMicroshear Bond Strength.Adhesión DentalCerámicaAdhesivo UniversalResistencia al Corte The constant evolution of dental ceramics has led to the appearance of hybrid ceramics or also called PICN. However, these new materials require new adhesives and cementation techniques. Materials and Methods: Five VITA ENAMIC blocks were sectioned into sheets (12 x 14 x 1.5 mm), and their surfaces were treated by acid etching and sandblasting (50 µ Al2O4), then randomly divided into two groups according to the type of adhesive: conventional adhesive group (GAC, n = 30) and universal adhesive group (GAU, n = 30). In addition to this, 60 microtubes were made with resin; each of them was cemented with the same cement, on each of the ceramic sheets. After this procedure, they were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 hours. Each microtube was then peeled off by micro-shearing. And the bond strength (RU) was measured in MPa. Statistical analysis was performed with a Student's t test. Statistical significance was 0.05 and confidence was 95%. Results: The RU of the universal adhesive (36.94 MPa) were higher than the conventional one (32.76 MPa). Student's t showed that there was a difference between the groups. p = 0.009 Conclusions: RU on hybrid ceramic was better when the universal adhesive was used. Attempting to use a conventional adhesive plus a previously applied silane did not result in an improvement in bond strengths. Objetivo:La constante evolución de las cerámicas dentales, ha llevado al aparecimiento de las cerámicas híbridas o también llamadas PICN. Sin embargo, estos nuevos materiales necesitan de nuevos adhesivos y técnicas de cementación. Materiales y Métodos: Cinco bloques de VITA ENAMIC se seccionaron en láminas (12 x 14 x 1.5 mm), y sus superficies fueron tratadas por medio de un grabado ácido y un arenado (Al2O4 de 50 µ), luego fueron divididas de forma aleatoria en dos grupos de acuerdo al tipo de adhesivo: Grupo adhesivo convencional (GAC, n = 30) y Grupo adhesivo universal (GAU, n = 30). Adicional a esto, se elaboraron 60 microtubos con resina; cada uno de ellos fue cementado con un mismo cemento, sobre cada una de las láminas de cerámica. Terminado este procedimiento fueron almacenadas en agua a 37º C por 24 horas. Después, cada microtubo fue despegado por medio del microcizallamiento. Se midió la resistencia de unión (RU) en MPa. El análisis estadístico se realizó con una T de Student. La significancia estadística fue del 0,05 y la confianza del 95%. Resultados: Las RU del adhesivo universal (36.94 MPa) fueron superiores al convencional (32.76 MPa). La t de student demostró que existió diferencia entre los grupos. p= 0,009 Conclusiones: La RU sobre la cerámica híbrida fue mejor cuando se utilizó el adhesivo universal. El intento de utilizar un adhesivo convencional más un silano aplicado antes, no resultó en una mejora en las fuerzas de unión. Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Facultad de Odontología.2022-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472KIRU ; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022): KIRU (ABRIL-JUNIO) KIRU ISSN (Impreso): 1812 - 7886 ISSN (Digital): 2410-2717; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2022): KIRU (ABRIL-JUNIO)2410-27171812-7886reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472/2956https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472/Comparaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20fuerza%20de%20adhesi%C3%B3n%20entre%20una%20cer%C3%A1mica%20h%C3%ADbrida%20y%20un%20adhesivo%20convencional%20vs%20uno%20a%20base%20de%2010%20MDPDerechos de autor 2022 Revista KIRUinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/24722023-10-06T00:21:49Z |
score |
12.87381 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).