Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
Descripción del Articulo
Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2013 |
| Institución: | Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/7 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Resilience Teacher Education Measurement Resiliencia Docente Educación Medición |
| id |
REVUSIL_524844ad0a1252b92cd26a72e679f813 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/7 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUSIL |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| spelling |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher ResilienceConstruction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher ResilienceConstrucción, validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Resiliencia DocenteGuerra, José L.ResilienceTeacherEducationMeasurementResilienciaDocenteEducaciónMediciónConsidering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.En la revisión que se ha realizado con relación a instrumentos para medir la resiliencia, no se ha encontrado inguno construido específicamente desde y para docentes peruanos de las escuelas públicas de educación básica regular. Por tal motivo, uno de los objetivos del estudio que se informa fue construir un instrumento para medir la resiliencia, tomando los fundamentos teóricos expresados por Henderson y Milstein (2003). Para ello, participaron 710 docentes de ambos sexos pertenecientes a las escuelas públicas de la Región Callao. Los resultados muestran que 71 ítems se distribuyeron en cuatro factores: 1) participación significativa, 2) conducta prosocial, 3) autoestima y aprendizaje; y 4) percepción de apoyo. El coeficiente alfa de cronbach de la escala es de .957, con lo cual se demuestra que la Escala de Resiliencia Docente (ER-D) es altamente confiable. Asimismo, la escala cuenta con validez de contenido apoyada por el análisis de diez jueces expertos y con validez de constructo. Es un instrumento probado en una muestra urbana y cuenta con baremos para la población chalaca.Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.2013-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/710.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.vol## 1 ##issue.no## 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-862310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2013.v1n1reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspahttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7/121Derechos de autor 2013 Propósitos y Representacionesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/72022-04-01T19:38:54Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience Construcción, validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Resiliencia Docente |
| title |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| spellingShingle |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience Guerra, José L. Resilience Teacher Education Measurement Resiliencia Docente Educación Medición |
| title_short |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| title_full |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| title_fullStr |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| title_sort |
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Guerra, José L. |
| author |
Guerra, José L. |
| author_facet |
Guerra, José L. |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Teacher Education Measurement Resiliencia Docente Educación Medición |
| topic |
Resilience Teacher Education Measurement Resiliencia Docente Educación Medición |
| description |
Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06-25 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7 10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7 |
| url |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7/121 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2013 Propósitos y Representaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2013 Propósitos y Representaciones |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86 Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.vol## 1 ##issue.no## 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86 Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86 2310-4635 2307-7999 10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola instacron:USIL |
| instname_str |
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| instacron_str |
USIL |
| institution |
USIL |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1789528870238552064 |
| score |
13.919782 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
