Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement
Descripción del Articulo
Technical Requirements Debt is defined as the difference between the initially stated requirements and the final software product. This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review based on a methodology structured in three phases: definition of a search protocol, selection of relevant scie...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad La Salle |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad La Salle |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe:article/292 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292 https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24.a292 https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24/a292 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Debt of requirements technical debt of requirements requirement smells causes measurement Deuda de requisitos deuda técnica de requerimientos olores de requisitos causas medición |
| id |
REVUSALLE_f9725674d748a1cf4a7e4215f17030c5 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe:article/292 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUSALLE |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad La Salle |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura de la Deuda de Requisitos: Sus Causas y Medición |
| title |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| spellingShingle |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement Sanchez Hernández, Maria Janai Debt of requirements technical debt of requirements requirement smells causes measurement Deuda de requisitos deuda técnica de requerimientos olores de requisitos causas medición |
| title_short |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| title_full |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| title_fullStr |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| title_sort |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and Measurement |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sanchez Hernández, Maria Janai Medina Barrera, Maria Guadalupe Ramírez Cruz, José Federico Pedroza-Méndez , Blanca Estela |
| author |
Sanchez Hernández, Maria Janai |
| author_facet |
Sanchez Hernández, Maria Janai Medina Barrera, Maria Guadalupe Ramírez Cruz, José Federico Pedroza-Méndez , Blanca Estela |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Medina Barrera, Maria Guadalupe Ramírez Cruz, José Federico Pedroza-Méndez , Blanca Estela |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Debt of requirements technical debt of requirements requirement smells causes measurement Deuda de requisitos deuda técnica de requerimientos olores de requisitos causas medición |
| topic |
Debt of requirements technical debt of requirements requirement smells causes measurement Deuda de requisitos deuda técnica de requerimientos olores de requisitos causas medición |
| description |
Technical Requirements Debt is defined as the difference between the initially stated requirements and the final software product. This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review based on a methodology structured in three phases: definition of a search protocol, selection of relevant scientific sources, and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a synthesis of the collected information. Research from the last five years was analyzed, considering a total of thirteen articles. The results indicate that the main causes of Technical Requirements Debt include the lack of formal documentation, pressure to meet deadlines, poor communication between the client and the development team, as well as the absence of automated tools that optimize requirements traceability, among other factors. Regarding its measurement, strategies such as cost-benefit analysis and rectification cost estimation have been proposed; however, these have not yet been validated in real-world contexts, which limits their practical applicability. In conclusion, Technical Requirements Debt represents a challenge in software engineering, directly affecting project quality and success. This work provides an updated overview that can serve as a basis for future research in the area, with the goal of developing more effective strategies for its management and possible mitigation. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-09-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Review papers Artículos de revisión |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292 https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24.a292 https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24/a292 |
| url |
https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292 https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24.a292 https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24/a292 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292/421 https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292/422 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2026 Innovación y Software https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2026 Innovación y Software https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Software engineering Ingeniería de Software |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad La Salle |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad La Salle |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Innovation and Software; Vol 6 No 2 (2025): September - February; 217-236 Innovación y Software; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2025): Septiembre - Febrero; 217-236 2708-0935 2708-0927 https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24 https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24 reponame:Revistas - Universidad La Salle instname:Universidad La Salle instacron:USALLE |
| instname_str |
Universidad La Salle |
| instacron_str |
USALLE |
| institution |
USALLE |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad La Salle |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad La Salle |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1868091248588357632 |
| spelling |
Systematic Review of the Debt Requirements Literature: Its Causes and MeasurementRevisión Sistemática de la Literatura de la Deuda de Requisitos: Sus Causas y MediciónSanchez Hernández, Maria JanaiMedina Barrera, Maria GuadalupeRamírez Cruz, José FedericoPedroza-Méndez , Blanca Estela Debt of requirementstechnical debt of requirementsrequirement smellscausesmeasurementDeuda de requisitosdeuda técnica de requerimientosolores de requisitoscausasmediciónTechnical Requirements Debt is defined as the difference between the initially stated requirements and the final software product. This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review based on a methodology structured in three phases: definition of a search protocol, selection of relevant scientific sources, and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a synthesis of the collected information. Research from the last five years was analyzed, considering a total of thirteen articles. The results indicate that the main causes of Technical Requirements Debt include the lack of formal documentation, pressure to meet deadlines, poor communication between the client and the development team, as well as the absence of automated tools that optimize requirements traceability, among other factors. Regarding its measurement, strategies such as cost-benefit analysis and rectification cost estimation have been proposed; however, these have not yet been validated in real-world contexts, which limits their practical applicability. In conclusion, Technical Requirements Debt represents a challenge in software engineering, directly affecting project quality and success. This work provides an updated overview that can serve as a basis for future research in the area, with the goal of developing more effective strategies for its management and possible mitigation.La Deuda Técnica de Requisitos se define como la diferencia entre los requisitos inicialmente planteados y el producto final de software. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo realizar una Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura, basada en una metodología estructurada en tres fases: definición de un protocolo de búsqueda, selección de fuentes científicas relevantes y aplicación de criterios de inclusión y exclusión, seguido de la síntesis de la información recopilada. Se analizaron investigaciones de los últimos cinco años, considerando un total de trece artículos. Los resultados indican que las principales causas de la Deuda Técnica de Requisitos incluyen la falta de documentación formal, la presión por cumplir con plazos de entrega, la deficiente comunicación entre el cliente y el equipo de desarrollo, así como la ausencia de herramientas automatizadas que optimicen la trazabilidad de los requisitos, entre otros factores. Respecto a su medición, se han propuesto estrategias como el análisis costo-beneficio y la estimación de costos de rectificación; sin embargo, aún no se han validado en contextos reales, lo que limita su aplicabilidad práctica. En conclusión, la Deuda Técnica de Requisitos representa un desafío en la ingeniería de software, afectando directamente la calidad y el éxito de los proyectos. Este trabajo proporciona un panorama actualizado que puede servir como fundamento para futuras investigaciones en el área, con el fin de desarrollar estrategias más efectivas para su gestión y posible mitigación.Universidad La Salle2025-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionReview papersArtículos de revisiónapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24.a292https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24/a292Innovation and Software; Vol 6 No 2 (2025): September - February; 217-236Innovación y Software; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2025): Septiembre - Febrero; 217-2362708-09352708-0927https://doi.org/10.48168/innosoft.s24https://n2t.net/ark:/42411/s24reponame:Revistas - Universidad La Salleinstname:Universidad La Salleinstacron:USALLEspahttps://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292/421https://revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe/innosoft/article/view/292/422Software engineeringIngeniería de Software Derechos de autor 2026 Innovación y Softwarehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.ulasalle.edu.pe:article/2922026-03-09T03:41:24Z |
| score |
13.408945 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).