Methodological recommendations for the elaboration of the discussion of the clinical case report: Recomendaciones metodológicas para la elaboración de la discusión de un reporte de caso clínico

Descripción del Articulo

Introduction: Case reports are a type of biomedical publication that allow us to share experiences regarding the etiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and prognosis of anecdotal events that occur both in one and in several patients during clinical practice. Objective: to elaborate methodological recomm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pichardo Rodriguez, Rafael, Saavedra Velazco, Marcos, Bracamonte Hernández, Juan Jesús, Peña Oscuvilca, Willy, Ruiz Franco, Oscar
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/5654
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/RFMH/article/view/5654
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Review
Methods
Case Reports
Research methodology
Revisión
Métodos
Informes de Casos
Métodología de investigación
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Case reports are a type of biomedical publication that allow us to share experiences regarding the etiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and prognosis of anecdotal events that occur both in one and in several patients during clinical practice. Objective: to elaborate methodological recommendations for the elaboration of the discussion of a clinical case report. Methods: A narrative review of international guidelines and available evidence was carried out. Results: A total of 411,227 articles were located, finally selecting 10 narrative review articles. Discussion: The discussion is the most relevant section of the case report despite being considered by some journals as an optional contribution. We recommend for the elaboration of the discussion, to follow the following four steps: a) finding and comparison with the current evidence, b) justification of the causality of the findings, c) limitations and strengths in the management of the exposed case and d) clinical implications and prospects for the future. Conclusion: It is recommended to follow the four sequential steps for the elaboration of the discussion and to evaluate its impact on the scientific production in undergraduate and postgraduate students.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).