Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case

Descripción del Articulo

In the 1990s, several Latin American countries privatized their social security schemes to a greater or lesser extent. The main reason for these reforms was the dearth of public PAYG systems. As yet, here is no consensus on how these reforms stand to affect pensions. We focus on the Uruguayan case,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Forteza, Álvaro, Rossi, Ianina
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad del Pacífico
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad del Pacífico
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.up.edu.pe:article/865
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUP_5473bd7a90c7ce50c2155d4a408a0b87
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.up.edu.pe:article/865
network_acronym_str REVUP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad del Pacífico
repository_id_str
spelling Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan caseGanadores y perdedores en las primeras generaciones luego de una reforma estructural de la seguridad social: el caso de UruguayForteza, ÁlvaroRossi, IaninaIn the 1990s, several Latin American countries privatized their social security schemes to a greater or lesser extent. The main reason for these reforms was the dearth of public PAYG systems. As yet, here is no consensus on how these reforms stand to affect pensions. We focus on the Uruguayan case, where the first generations of the new regime are due to retire soon. Some workers will receive lower pensions than those with similar income and labor histories but who retired under the «transitional» regime. Meanwhile, others will receive higher pensions. We present simulations to help understand the specifics of the problem and identify potential winners and losers.En la década de 1990, varios países latinoamericanos privatizaron en alguna medida su seguridad social. El principal motivo para hacerlo fue el déficit de los sistemas públicos de reparto. No existe consenso acerca de cuál sería el efecto sobre las pensiones. En este estudio, nos centramos en el caso uruguayo, donde próximamente se estarán pensionando las primeras generaciones del nuevo régimen. Se estima que algunos trabajadores recibirán jubilaciones menores que las que recibieron trabajadores de similar ingreso e historia laboral del régimen de transición; otros recibirán jubilaciones mayores. En este documento presentamos simulaciones que ayudan a entender la naturaleza del problema e identificar potenciales perdedores y ganadores.Universidad del Pacífico2018-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/86510.21678/apuntes.82.865Apuntes. Social Sciences Journal; Vol. 45 Núm. 82 (2018): Apuntes 82; 99-119Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales; Vol. 45 Núm. 82 (2018): Apuntes 82; 99-1192223-17570252-1865reponame:Revistas - Universidad del Pacíficoinstname:Universidad del Pacíficoinstacron:UPspaenghttps://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1031https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1043https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1069https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1080Derechos de autor 2018 Apunteshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.up.edu.pe:article/8652018-08-23T06:59:36Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
Ganadores y perdedores en las primeras generaciones luego de una reforma estructural de la seguridad social: el caso de Uruguay
title Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
spellingShingle Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
Forteza, Álvaro
title_short Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
title_full Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
title_fullStr Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
title_full_unstemmed Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
title_sort Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Forteza, Álvaro
Rossi, Ianina
author Forteza, Álvaro
author_facet Forteza, Álvaro
Rossi, Ianina
author_role author
author2 Rossi, Ianina
author2_role author
description In the 1990s, several Latin American countries privatized their social security schemes to a greater or lesser extent. The main reason for these reforms was the dearth of public PAYG systems. As yet, here is no consensus on how these reforms stand to affect pensions. We focus on the Uruguayan case, where the first generations of the new regime are due to retire soon. Some workers will receive lower pensions than those with similar income and labor histories but who retired under the «transitional» regime. Meanwhile, others will receive higher pensions. We present simulations to help understand the specifics of the problem and identify potential winners and losers.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865
10.21678/apuntes.82.865
url https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865
identifier_str_mv 10.21678/apuntes.82.865
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1031
https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1043
https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1069
https://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/865/1080
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Apuntes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Apuntes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Pacífico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Pacífico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Apuntes. Social Sciences Journal; Vol. 45 Núm. 82 (2018): Apuntes 82; 99-119
Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales; Vol. 45 Núm. 82 (2018): Apuntes 82; 99-119
2223-1757
0252-1865
reponame:Revistas - Universidad del Pacífico
instname:Universidad del Pacífico
instacron:UP
instname_str Universidad del Pacífico
instacron_str UP
institution UP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad del Pacífico
collection Revistas - Universidad del Pacífico
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1790892662707978240
score 13.888049
Winners and losers in the first generations after structural social security reform: the Uruguayan case
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares