Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: This research was conducted in order to determine the effect of Article 2022 (Enforceability of interests in land) of the Civil Code the right of property in good faith not registered and the embargo registration form in the Process Third party judicial of Property in Peru, 1996-200. Meth...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Universidad Privada de Tacna |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.172.30.101.191:article/212 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/212 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
id |
REVUPT_f7926695feb97046870d4ac7d81617c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.30.101.191:article/212 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUPT |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in Incidencia del artículo 2022 (oponibilidad de derechos reales sobre inmuebles) del código civil en el conflicto entre el derecho de propiedad de buena fe no inscrito y el embargo en forma de inscripción en los procesos judiciales de tercería de propiedad |
title |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
spellingShingle |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in Franco Apaza, Pedro David |
title_short |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
title_full |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
title_fullStr |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
title_full_unstemmed |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
title_sort |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties in |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Franco Apaza, Pedro David |
author |
Franco Apaza, Pedro David |
author_facet |
Franco Apaza, Pedro David |
author_role |
author |
description |
Objective: This research was conducted in order to determine the effect of Article 2022 (Enforceability of interests in land) of the Civil Code the right of property in good faith not registered and the embargo registration form in the Process Third party judicial of Property in Peru, 1996-200. Method: The research corresponds to the theoretical and applied type, with a nonexperimental descriptive explanatory design (ex post facto). The information was obtained with the application of the questionnaire, the Certificate of interview 27 and documentary analysis; used nominal scales and quantitative type. The study population is represented by lawyers, judges and judgments Casatorias issued by the Supreme Court. Results: In Peru Article 2022 (Enforceability of interests in land) of the Civil Code affects the conflict between the right of property in good faith not enrolled and yet in the form of registration in court proceedings of third party property in the Peru, 1996-200. The most important results are: a) Article 2022 of the Civil Code of Peru generates controversy in the valuation criteria applied by the Supreme judges when deciding on the mediation of property filed against embargoes in registration form; b) Article 2022 of the Civil Code does not guarantee legal certainty in judicial proceedings of third party property in Peru; c) There are deficiencies in the regulations prescribed in Article 2022 (Enforceability of Rights on Real Estate) of the Civil Code of Peru; and, d) Judicial Processes for third party property in Peru, must prioritize the embargo registration form. Conclusion: Article 2022 of the Civil Code of Peru generates controversy in the valuation criteria applied by the Supreme judges when deciding on the mediation of property filed against embargoes as enrollment, 1996-201 |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/212 10.47796/ves.v5i1.212 |
url |
https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/212 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47796/ves.v5i1.212 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/212/196 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Privada de Tacna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Privada de Tacna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritas et Scientia; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2016): Veritas et Scientia; pp. 26 - 40 Veritas et Scientia; Vol 5 No 1 (2016): Veritas et Scientia; pp. 26 - 40 2617-0639 2307-5139 10.47796/ves.v5i1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna instname:Universidad Privada de Tacna instacron:UPT |
instname_str |
Universidad Privada de Tacna |
instacron_str |
UPT |
institution |
UPT |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1771324560212230144 |
spelling |
Incidence of article 2022 (enforceability of real property rights) of the civil code in the conflict between the unregistered right to property in good faith and the embargo in the form of registration in the legal proceedings of property third parties inIncidencia del artículo 2022 (oponibilidad de derechos reales sobre inmuebles) del código civil en el conflicto entre el derecho de propiedad de buena fe no inscrito y el embargo en forma de inscripción en los procesos judiciales de tercería de propiedadFranco Apaza, Pedro DavidObjective: This research was conducted in order to determine the effect of Article 2022 (Enforceability of interests in land) of the Civil Code the right of property in good faith not registered and the embargo registration form in the Process Third party judicial of Property in Peru, 1996-200. Method: The research corresponds to the theoretical and applied type, with a nonexperimental descriptive explanatory design (ex post facto). The information was obtained with the application of the questionnaire, the Certificate of interview 27 and documentary analysis; used nominal scales and quantitative type. The study population is represented by lawyers, judges and judgments Casatorias issued by the Supreme Court. Results: In Peru Article 2022 (Enforceability of interests in land) of the Civil Code affects the conflict between the right of property in good faith not enrolled and yet in the form of registration in court proceedings of third party property in the Peru, 1996-200. The most important results are: a) Article 2022 of the Civil Code of Peru generates controversy in the valuation criteria applied by the Supreme judges when deciding on the mediation of property filed against embargoes in registration form; b) Article 2022 of the Civil Code does not guarantee legal certainty in judicial proceedings of third party property in Peru; c) There are deficiencies in the regulations prescribed in Article 2022 (Enforceability of Rights on Real Estate) of the Civil Code of Peru; and, d) Judicial Processes for third party property in Peru, must prioritize the embargo registration form. Conclusion: Article 2022 of the Civil Code of Peru generates controversy in the valuation criteria applied by the Supreme judges when deciding on the mediation of property filed against embargoes as enrollment, 1996-201Objetivo: El presente trabajo de investigación se realizó con el propósito de determinar la incidencia del artículo 2022 (Oponibilidad de Derechos Reales sobre inmuebles) del Código Civil en el derecho de propiedad de buena fe no inscrito y el embargo en forma de inscripción en los Procesos Judiciales de Tercería de Propiedad en el Perú, 1996-200. Método: La investigación corresponde al tipo aplicada, con un diseño no experimental (ex post facto) descriptivo explicativo. La información se obtuvo con la aplicación del Cuestionario, la Cédula de Entrevista y el Análisis documental; utilizándose escalas de tipo nominal y cuantitativa. La población de estudio está representada por los abogados, magistrados y Sentencias Casatorias emitidas por la Corte Suprema. Resultados: En el Perú el artículo 2022 (Oponibilidad de Derechos Reales sobre inmuebles) del Código Civil incide en el conflicto entre el derecho de propiedad de buena fe no inscrito y el embargo en forma de inscripción en los procesos judiciales de tercería de propiedad en el Perú, 1996-200. Los resultados más importantes son: a)El artículo 2022 del Código Civil del Perú genera controversia en los criterios de valoración que aplican los jueces supremos al momento de decidir sobre la tercería de propiedad interpuesta en contra de los embargos en forma de inscripción; b)El artículo 2022 del Código Civil no garantiza la seguridad jurídica en los procesos judiciales de tercería de propiedad en el Perú; c) Existen deficiencias en la normatividad prescrita en el artículo 2022 (Oponibilidad de Derechos Reales Sobre Inmuebles) del Código Civil del Perú; y, d) En Los procesos judiciales de tercería de propiedad en el Perú, debe primar el embargo en forma de inscripción. Conclusión: El artículo 2022 del Código Civil del Perú genera controversia en los criterios de valoración que aplican los jueces supremos al momento de decidir sobre la tercería de propiedad interpuesta en contra de los embargos en forma de inscripción, 1996-2012Universidad Privada de Tacna2020-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/21210.47796/ves.v5i1.212Veritas et Scientia; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2016): Veritas et Scientia; pp. 26 - 40Veritas et Scientia; Vol 5 No 1 (2016): Veritas et Scientia; pp. 26 - 402617-06392307-513910.47796/ves.v5i1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacnainstname:Universidad Privada de Tacnainstacron:UPTspahttps://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/212/196info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.172.30.101.191:article/2122021-07-12T18:01:59Z |
score |
13.896995 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).