Analysis of the psychometric properties of a scale to measure the deterioration of romantic relationships in young people from the department of Puno
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: to analyze the psychometric properties of a scale to measure the deterioration of romanticrelationships in young people from the department of Puno. Methodology: non-experimental design,cross-sectional, instrumental type and quantitative approach, it is made up of 600 subjects whovoluntar...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana Unión |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.revistas.upeu.edu.pe:article/1655 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1655 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Control; autonomy; aggression; distrust; deterioration; toxic; relationships in young people. Control; autonomía; agresión; desconfianza; deterioro; toxico; relaciones en jóvenes. |
Sumario: | Objective: to analyze the psychometric properties of a scale to measure the deterioration of romanticrelationships in young people from the department of Puno. Methodology: non-experimental design,cross-sectional, instrumental type and quantitative approach, it is made up of 600 subjects whovoluntarily participated in the study from an outpatient application, some type of sampling was notused, the characteristics of the population show that the most perish to both genders, their ages arebetween 18 to 26 years and all of them establish a sentimental relationship. Results: the “IRTEP”scale, in its translated version, has a validity index (V = .958) based on the evaluation of four evaluationcriteria (clarity, context, congruence and command of the construct) in 6 judges. Regarding contentvalidity, it was obtained using the KMO and Bartlett’s sphericity tests, whose values (KMO = .942; p<.05) would indicate that the instrument is appropriate for a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), whichsuggests that The instrument must have a content distributed in 4 fixed factors in the extraction, it was possible to explain 47.6% of the explained variance. Reasons that led to a more detailed analysis such as structural equations. The findings demonstrated an RMSEA = .049 less than .05; CFI = .911 and aTLI = .903 both greater than .90; these results demonstrate an adequate model fit. Conclusion: theinstrument shows good internal consistency and construct validity. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).