PPM of labeled fluorine and analyzed fluorine in pediatric toothpaste commercialized in Lima-Peru.
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To determine the concentration of fluorine ppm in toothpastes for children that are commercialized in Lima Peru in the year 2017. Material y Methods: It is an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. 48 pediatric toothpastes sold in pharmaceutical esta...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3637 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3637 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Fluoride; pH; children; toothpaste; Peru. |
Sumario: | Objective: To determine the concentration of fluorine ppm in toothpastes for children that are commercialized in Lima Peru in the year 2017. Material y Methods: It is an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. 48 pediatric toothpastes sold in pharmaceutical establishments (pharmacies and drugstores) in Lima were collected. The Student t and Wilcoxon t tests were used for a single sample. Results: The difference between the concen-tration of fluorine as labeled and found in Colgate of 1 100 ppm was -119.8 ppm (median), Oral B of 500 ppm was -57.05 ppm (median). The difference between the concentration of fluorine according to labeling and that found based on the average was Colgate of 500 ppm: -34.2 ppm, Farmadent of 452 ppm: -36.27 ppm, Dentito of 550 ppm: -520.1 ppm, Aqua fresh of 500 ppm: +41.67 ppm, Vitis of 1 000 ppm: +141.85 ppm, Aqua Fresh of 1 150 ppm: +112.82 ppm; among those mentioned only Aqua Fresh 500 ppm was not significant. With respect to the pH of toothpastes, the averages were 5.92; 5.5; 5.5; 6; 6; 5.5; 5.5; 6, respectively. Conclusions: Five types of toothpaste have lower concentrations than labeling and three types of toothpastes have concentrations higher than the labeling (of which one was not significant). |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).