Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of males with underactive bladder and bladder outlet obstruction

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To describe clinical and urodynamic features in males with bladder underactive (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and exploratory case series among males with lower urinary tract symptoms. Group 1 were patients without BOO or unequivocal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Medina Ninacóndor , Raúl Pastor, Melgarejo Zevallos, Weymar, Medina Ninacondor, Patricia Medina Ninacondor, Melgarejo Anamaría, Claudia, Huayanay Falconi, Leandro, Loza-Munarriz , César, Cadenillas Coronel, Emma
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/5273
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/5273
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Vejiga urinaria de baja actividad
urodinamia
síntomas del sistema urinario inferior
Underactive Urinary Bladder
urodynamics
Lower urinary tract symptoms
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To describe clinical and urodynamic features in males with bladder underactive (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and exploratory case series among males with lower urinary tract symptoms. Group 1 were patients without BOO or unequivocal in the International Continence Society (ICS) nomogram but with DU diagnosis in the Scäafer’a nomogram. Group 2, patients with BOO in the ICS nomogram. A logistic regression model was conducted to identify the predictive variables of DU. Results: 95 patients were included, 36 with DU in group 1 and 59 with BOO in group 2. There was no difference in age and frequency of symptoms between groups. Age ≥ 56 years correlated with absence of DU [OR: 0.03 (0.01 – 0.26); p = 0.001], while DM [OR: 4.84 (1.21 – 19.34); p = 0.025] and DHIC [OR: 24.093 (6.66 – 87.10); p = 0.025] correlated with DU. Urodynamic variables that correlated with DU were WF ≤ 7 [OR: 23.10 (5.52 -96.67); p = 0.001] and BCI ≤ 99 [OR: 6.93 (1.92 – 24.90); p = 0.003]. Conclusions: Urodynamic variables, WF ≤ 7 and BCI ≤ 99, best correlated with DU.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).