Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To determine the validity and reliability of results obtained using the MEDUCPG14 instrument as well as to describe the results of the academic evaluation of surgical resident programs of a private university. Methods: A cross- sectional study was performed; the instrument was applied to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Flores Noriega, Mónica L., Carbajal Arroyo, Luz
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3980
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUPCH_7e84b0bb449109c76b8de43824c393d3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3980
network_acronym_str REVUPCH
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository_id_str
spelling Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 programEvaluación docente en los programas quirúrgicos de residentado médico mediante el instrumento MEDUCPG14Flores Noriega, Mónica L.Carbajal Arroyo, LuzObjectives: To determine the validity and reliability of results obtained using the MEDUCPG14 instrument as well as to describe the results of the academic evaluation of surgical resident programs of a private university. Methods: A cross- sectional study was performed; the instrument was applied to 77 residents of surgical programs of Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and to 41 professors. Results: A reliability coefficient of 0.959 was obtained. Two domains were found: teaching, feedback and evaluation (11 items) attained a coefficient of 0.957 and respectful treatment (3 items) attained a coefficient of 0.923. Answer rate was higher than 90%. No difference by age, gender and subspecialty was found. Conclusion: MEDUCPG-14 has adequate validity and reliability to evaluate academic performance in surgical resident programs. Four or more evaluations per professor are needed; no difference by age, sex and subspecialty was found.Objetivos: Determinar la validez y confiabilidad de los resultados del instrumento MEDUCPG14 y describir los resultados de la evaluación docente en los programas quirúrgicos de residentado médico de una universidad privada. Material y métodos: Estudio de tipo transversal de validación del instrumento MEDUCPG14. El instrumento fue aplicado a 77 médicos residentes de los programas quirúrgicos de residentado médico de la Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) y se evaluaron a 41 profesores. Resultados: Se obtuvo un coeficiente de confiabilidad de 0,959. Se encontraron dos dominios: Enseñanza y evaluación y retroalimentación (EER) (11 ítems) con confiabilidad de 0,957 y Trato respetuoso a pacientes y equipo de salud (TR) (3 ítems) con confiabilidad de 0,923. El porcentaje de respuesta fue mayor al 90%. No hubo diferencias significativas en los puntajes promedio por sexo, edad, especialidad y sede docente. Conclusión: El instrumento MEDUCPG-14 tiene una adecuada validez y confiabilidad en los programas quirúrgicos del residentado médico. Se requieren 4 o más evaluaciones por docente; no hubo diferencias en la evaluación de los docentes quirúrgicos en relación al sexo, sede docente y especialidad quirúrgica del médico residente.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia2021-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed articleArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/398010.20453/rmh.v32i2.3980Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2021): April-June; 72-78Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 Núm. 2 (2021): Abril-Junio; 72-78Revista Medica Herediana; v. 32 n. 2 (2021): Abril-Junio; 72-781729-214X1018-130Xreponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstacron:UPCHspahttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980/4534Derechos de autor 2021 Mónica L. Flores Noriega, Luz Carbajal Arroyoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/39802021-07-20T12:14:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
Evaluación docente en los programas quirúrgicos de residentado médico mediante el instrumento MEDUCPG14
title Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
spellingShingle Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
Flores Noriega, Mónica L.
title_short Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
title_full Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
title_fullStr Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
title_full_unstemmed Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
title_sort Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Flores Noriega, Mónica L.
Carbajal Arroyo, Luz
author Flores Noriega, Mónica L.
author_facet Flores Noriega, Mónica L.
Carbajal Arroyo, Luz
author_role author
author2 Carbajal Arroyo, Luz
author2_role author
description Objectives: To determine the validity and reliability of results obtained using the MEDUCPG14 instrument as well as to describe the results of the academic evaluation of surgical resident programs of a private university. Methods: A cross- sectional study was performed; the instrument was applied to 77 residents of surgical programs of Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and to 41 professors. Results: A reliability coefficient of 0.959 was obtained. Two domains were found: teaching, feedback and evaluation (11 items) attained a coefficient of 0.957 and respectful treatment (3 items) attained a coefficient of 0.923. Answer rate was higher than 90%. No difference by age, gender and subspecialty was found. Conclusion: MEDUCPG-14 has adequate validity and reliability to evaluate academic performance in surgical resident programs. Four or more evaluations per professor are needed; no difference by age, sex and subspecialty was found.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed article
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980
10.20453/rmh.v32i2.3980
url https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980
identifier_str_mv 10.20453/rmh.v32i2.3980
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980/4534
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Mónica L. Flores Noriega, Luz Carbajal Arroyo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Mónica L. Flores Noriega, Luz Carbajal Arroyo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2021): April-June; 72-78
Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 Núm. 2 (2021): Abril-Junio; 72-78
Revista Medica Herediana; v. 32 n. 2 (2021): Abril-Junio; 72-78
1729-214X
1018-130X
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron:UPCH
instname_str Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron_str UPCH
institution UPCH
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
collection Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853763015054196736
score 12.671221
Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares