In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth, Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber, Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly, Soto Carrión, Carolina
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3761
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUPCH_27548b070e3e13675021915fc6c15c19
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3761
network_acronym_str REVUPCH
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
Resistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales usados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijas
title In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
spellingShingle In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth
title_short In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
title_full In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
title_fullStr In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
title_full_unstemmed In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
title_sort In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth
Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber
Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly
Soto Carrión, Carolina
author Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth
author_facet Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth
Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber
Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly
Soto Carrión, Carolina
author_role author
author2 Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber
Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly
Soto Carrión, Carolina
author2_role author
author
author
description Objective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and methods: 100 specimens consisting of cements were prepared: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, which were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 specimens each group subject to photopolymerization and self-polymerization of 8mm in diameter and 5mm high, with an approximate distance of 2mm from the lamp for polymerization, a standardized high density polyethylene specimen was used, the type of sampling is not probabilistic. The specimens of each group were subjected to tensile testing using a universal testing machine (zwickiLine by Zwick / Roell), until the failure of the cement was achieved, subjected to a continuous force of 500 kg, with a fixed displacement speed of 1 cm / min Results: The average tensile strength of diametral tensile specimens of BisCem cement was 38.75 ± 11.56 MPa, Duolink cement was 64.30 MPa, Meron cement 57.14 MPa, Ketac Cem cement was 32.23 MPa, BisCem cement (38.753 MPa ) and Ketac Cem cement (39,233 MPa). Duolink dental cement is the one with the highest tensile strength of diametral specimens compared to Meron (57,137 MPa), which is similar. The tabulation and the analysis have been submitted to the Shapiro Wilk test, ANOVA analysis of variance and the Tuckey test. The values ​​of each sample are normally distributed with significant differences between the studied groups. Conclusions: Duolink adhesive resin cement specimens showed a higher diametral tensile strength with better significant strength values ​​unlike Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron and BisCem cements.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761
10.20453/reh.v30i2.3761
url https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761
identifier_str_mv 10.20453/reh.v30i2.3761
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761/4190
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): April - June; 94-107
Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107
Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 30 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107
2225-7616
1019-4355
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron:UPCH
instname_str Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron_str UPCH
institution UPCH
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
collection Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846787102060052480
spelling In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prosthesesResistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales usados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijasChávez Sánchez, ElizabethJiménez Mendoza, WilberMalpartida Valderrama, KellySoto Carrión, CarolinaObjective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and methods: 100 specimens consisting of cements were prepared: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, which were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 specimens each group subject to photopolymerization and self-polymerization of 8mm in diameter and 5mm high, with an approximate distance of 2mm from the lamp for polymerization, a standardized high density polyethylene specimen was used, the type of sampling is not probabilistic. The specimens of each group were subjected to tensile testing using a universal testing machine (zwickiLine by Zwick / Roell), until the failure of the cement was achieved, subjected to a continuous force of 500 kg, with a fixed displacement speed of 1 cm / min Results: The average tensile strength of diametral tensile specimens of BisCem cement was 38.75 ± 11.56 MPa, Duolink cement was 64.30 MPa, Meron cement 57.14 MPa, Ketac Cem cement was 32.23 MPa, BisCem cement (38.753 MPa ) and Ketac Cem cement (39,233 MPa). Duolink dental cement is the one with the highest tensile strength of diametral specimens compared to Meron (57,137 MPa), which is similar. The tabulation and the analysis have been submitted to the Shapiro Wilk test, ANOVA analysis of variance and the Tuckey test. The values ​​of each sample are normally distributed with significant differences between the studied groups. Conclusions: Duolink adhesive resin cement specimens showed a higher diametral tensile strength with better significant strength values ​​unlike Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron and BisCem cements.Objetivo: El propósito de la investigación fue evaluar la resistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, cuatro adhesivos convencionales y un autoadhesivo polimerizado químicamente utilizados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijas. Materiales y métodos: Se prepararon 100 especímenes conformados por cementos: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, los cuales se dividieron aleatoriamente en 5 grupos de 20 especímenes cada grupo sujetas a fotopolimerización y auto polimerización de 8mm de diámetro y 5mm de alto, con 2mm de distancia aproximadamente de la lámpara para la polimerización, se utilizó un formador de probetas de polietileno de alta densidad estandarizado, el tipo de muestreo es no probabilístico. Se sometieron a los especímenes de cada grupo a la prueba de tracción utilizando una máquina de ensayo universal (zwickiLine by Zwick/Roell), hasta lograr el fracaso del cemento, sometidas a una fuerza continua de 500 kg, con una velocidad de desplazamiento fija de 1 cm/min. Resultados: La resistencia promedio a la tracción diametral de probetas del cemento BisCem fue de 38,75 ± 11,56 MPa, del cemento Duolink fue 64,30 MPa, del cemento Meron   57,14 MPa, del cemento Ketac Cem es de 32,23 MPa, del cemento BisCem (38,753 MPa) y el cemento Ketac Cem (39,233 MPa). El cemento dental Duolink es aquel que presenta mayor resistencia a la tracción diametral de probetas en comparación a Meron (57,137 MPa) que es su similar. La tabulación y el análisis han sido sometidos a los test de Shapiro Wilk, análisis de varianza ANOVA y la prueba de Tuckey los valores de cada muestra se distribuyen normalmente existiendo diferencias significativas entre los grupos estudiados. Conclusiones: Las probetas del cemento de resina adhesiva Duolink evidenció una mayor resistencia a la tracción diametral con mejores valores significativos de resistencia a diferencia de los cementos Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron y BisCem.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia2020-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/376110.20453/reh.v30i2.3761Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): April - June; 94-107Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 30 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-1072225-76161019-4355reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstacron:UPCHspahttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761/4190Derechos de autor 2020 Elizabeth Chávez Sánchez, Wilber Jiménez Mendoza, Kelly Malpartida Valderrama, Carolina Soto Carrióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/37612021-05-27T15:14:49Z
score 12.80667
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).