In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3761 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVUPCH_27548b070e3e13675021915fc6c15c19 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3761 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUPCH |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses Resistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales usados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijas |
| title |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| spellingShingle |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth |
| title_short |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| title_full |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| title_fullStr |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| title_sort |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly Soto Carrión, Carolina |
| author |
Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth |
| author_facet |
Chávez Sánchez, Elizabeth Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly Soto Carrión, Carolina |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Jiménez Mendoza, Wilber Malpartida Valderrama, Kelly Soto Carrión, Carolina |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| description |
Objective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and methods: 100 specimens consisting of cements were prepared: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, which were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 specimens each group subject to photopolymerization and self-polymerization of 8mm in diameter and 5mm high, with an approximate distance of 2mm from the lamp for polymerization, a standardized high density polyethylene specimen was used, the type of sampling is not probabilistic. The specimens of each group were subjected to tensile testing using a universal testing machine (zwickiLine by Zwick / Roell), until the failure of the cement was achieved, subjected to a continuous force of 500 kg, with a fixed displacement speed of 1 cm / min Results: The average tensile strength of diametral tensile specimens of BisCem cement was 38.75 ± 11.56 MPa, Duolink cement was 64.30 MPa, Meron cement 57.14 MPa, Ketac Cem cement was 32.23 MPa, BisCem cement (38.753 MPa ) and Ketac Cem cement (39,233 MPa). Duolink dental cement is the one with the highest tensile strength of diametral specimens compared to Meron (57,137 MPa), which is similar. The tabulation and the analysis have been submitted to the Shapiro Wilk test, ANOVA analysis of variance and the Tuckey test. The values of each sample are normally distributed with significant differences between the studied groups. Conclusions: Duolink adhesive resin cement specimens showed a higher diametral tensile strength with better significant strength values unlike Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron and BisCem cements. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-22 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761 10.20453/reh.v30i2.3761 |
| url |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20453/reh.v30i2.3761 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761/4190 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): April - June; 94-107 Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107 Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 30 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107 2225-7616 1019-4355 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia instname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia instacron:UPCH |
| instname_str |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| instacron_str |
UPCH |
| institution |
UPCH |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846787102060052480 |
| spelling |
In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prosthesesResistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales usados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijasChávez Sánchez, ElizabethJiménez Mendoza, WilberMalpartida Valderrama, KellySoto Carrión, CarolinaObjective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures. Materials and methods: 100 specimens consisting of cements were prepared: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, which were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 specimens each group subject to photopolymerization and self-polymerization of 8mm in diameter and 5mm high, with an approximate distance of 2mm from the lamp for polymerization, a standardized high density polyethylene specimen was used, the type of sampling is not probabilistic. The specimens of each group were subjected to tensile testing using a universal testing machine (zwickiLine by Zwick / Roell), until the failure of the cement was achieved, subjected to a continuous force of 500 kg, with a fixed displacement speed of 1 cm / min Results: The average tensile strength of diametral tensile specimens of BisCem cement was 38.75 ± 11.56 MPa, Duolink cement was 64.30 MPa, Meron cement 57.14 MPa, Ketac Cem cement was 32.23 MPa, BisCem cement (38.753 MPa ) and Ketac Cem cement (39,233 MPa). Duolink dental cement is the one with the highest tensile strength of diametral specimens compared to Meron (57,137 MPa), which is similar. The tabulation and the analysis have been submitted to the Shapiro Wilk test, ANOVA analysis of variance and the Tuckey test. The values of each sample are normally distributed with significant differences between the studied groups. Conclusions: Duolink adhesive resin cement specimens showed a higher diametral tensile strength with better significant strength values unlike Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron and BisCem cements.Objetivo: El propósito de la investigación fue evaluar la resistencia a la tracción diametral in vitro de cinco cementos dentales: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, cuatro adhesivos convencionales y un autoadhesivo polimerizado químicamente utilizados como cementantes de puentes y coronas en prótesis fijas. Materiales y métodos: Se prepararon 100 especímenes conformados por cementos: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, los cuales se dividieron aleatoriamente en 5 grupos de 20 especímenes cada grupo sujetas a fotopolimerización y auto polimerización de 8mm de diámetro y 5mm de alto, con 2mm de distancia aproximadamente de la lámpara para la polimerización, se utilizó un formador de probetas de polietileno de alta densidad estandarizado, el tipo de muestreo es no probabilístico. Se sometieron a los especímenes de cada grupo a la prueba de tracción utilizando una máquina de ensayo universal (zwickiLine by Zwick/Roell), hasta lograr el fracaso del cemento, sometidas a una fuerza continua de 500 kg, con una velocidad de desplazamiento fija de 1 cm/min. Resultados: La resistencia promedio a la tracción diametral de probetas del cemento BisCem fue de 38,75 ± 11,56 MPa, del cemento Duolink fue 64,30 MPa, del cemento Meron 57,14 MPa, del cemento Ketac Cem es de 32,23 MPa, del cemento BisCem (38,753 MPa) y el cemento Ketac Cem (39,233 MPa). El cemento dental Duolink es aquel que presenta mayor resistencia a la tracción diametral de probetas en comparación a Meron (57,137 MPa) que es su similar. La tabulación y el análisis han sido sometidos a los test de Shapiro Wilk, análisis de varianza ANOVA y la prueba de Tuckey los valores de cada muestra se distribuyen normalmente existiendo diferencias significativas entre los grupos estudiados. Conclusiones: Las probetas del cemento de resina adhesiva Duolink evidenció una mayor resistencia a la tracción diametral con mejores valores significativos de resistencia a diferencia de los cementos Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron y BisCem.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia2020-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/376110.20453/reh.v30i2.3761Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): April - June; 94-107Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-107Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 30 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junio; 94-1072225-76161019-4355reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstacron:UPCHspahttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3761/4190Derechos de autor 2020 Elizabeth Chávez Sánchez, Wilber Jiménez Mendoza, Kelly Malpartida Valderrama, Carolina Soto Carrióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/37612021-05-27T15:14:49Z |
| score |
12.80667 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).