Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011

Descripción del Articulo

Core of medical audit is a properly tailored medical history. The medical record includes all medical examinations, studies conducted and treatments applied during the course of the disease. Objectives: To assess medical records registration quality of Internal Medicine doctor’s offices at Clinica C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Matzumura Kasano, Juan P., Gutiérrez Crespo, Hugo, Sotomayor Salas, Janeth, Pajuelo Carrasco, Gabriela
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/9781
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/9781
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Medical audit
quality registration
medical records
outpatient doctor
Auditoría médica
calidad de registro
historias clínicas
consultorios externos
id REVUNMSM_f6aa1ce26101c2528dfd3d1559d8648c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/9781
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
Evaluación de la calidad de registro de historias clínicas en consultorios externos del servicio de medicina interna de la Clínica Centenario Peruano Japonesa, 2010-2011
title Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
spellingShingle Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
Matzumura Kasano, Juan P.
Medical audit
quality registration
medical records
outpatient doctor
Auditoría médica
calidad de registro
historias clínicas
consultorios externos
title_short Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
title_full Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
title_fullStr Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
title_sort Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Matzumura Kasano, Juan P.
Gutiérrez Crespo, Hugo
Sotomayor Salas, Janeth
Pajuelo Carrasco, Gabriela
author Matzumura Kasano, Juan P.
author_facet Matzumura Kasano, Juan P.
Gutiérrez Crespo, Hugo
Sotomayor Salas, Janeth
Pajuelo Carrasco, Gabriela
author_role author
author2 Gutiérrez Crespo, Hugo
Sotomayor Salas, Janeth
Pajuelo Carrasco, Gabriela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Medical audit
quality registration
medical records
outpatient doctor
Auditoría médica
calidad de registro
historias clínicas
consultorios externos
topic Medical audit
quality registration
medical records
outpatient doctor
Auditoría médica
calidad de registro
historias clínicas
consultorios externos
description Core of medical audit is a properly tailored medical history. The medical record includes all medical examinations, studies conducted and treatments applied during the course of the disease. Objectives: To assess medical records registration quality of Internal Medicine doctor’s offices at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Location: Internal Medicine outpatient offices at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Material: Clinical records of patients attended in Internal Medicine doctor’s offices. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-three medical records were collected by random sampling and subjected to a 10-items record audit, each rated at 10 points, for a total of 100 points. Items included date and time of care, neatness and legibility suitable record, vital signs, physical examination, diagnosis, plan of work, laboratory findings, complete treatment, and signature and stamp of the physician. Records with total score more than or equal to 80 were rated as ‘acceptable’, and all others as ‘need to improve’. Main outcome measures: ‘Acceptable’ or ‘need to improve’ medical records. Results: Two hundred and six (63.8%) clinical records were rated as ‘acceptable’ and 117 (36.2%) as ‘need to improve’. Items diagnosis and complete treatment presented poor registry more frequently, both in records with acceptable registry (filled in completely in 64.6% and 62.6% respectively) and those with need to improve registry (20.5% and 23.1% respectively). Signature and seal of the attending physician were the best items in both categories (99.5% and 93.2% respectively). Conclusions: More than half of the medical records had an acceptable quality at the Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/9781
10.15381/anales.v75i3.9781
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/9781
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/anales.v75i3.9781
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/9781/8633
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 75 No. 3 (2014); 251-257
Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 75 Núm. 3 (2014); 251-257
1609-9419
1025-5583
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238251530813440
spelling Quality assessment of medical records at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa internal medicine doctor’s offices, 2010 – 2011Evaluación de la calidad de registro de historias clínicas en consultorios externos del servicio de medicina interna de la Clínica Centenario Peruano Japonesa, 2010-2011Matzumura Kasano, Juan P.Gutiérrez Crespo, HugoSotomayor Salas, JanethPajuelo Carrasco, GabrielaMedical auditquality registrationmedical recordsoutpatient doctorAuditoría médicacalidad de registrohistorias clínicasconsultorios externosCore of medical audit is a properly tailored medical history. The medical record includes all medical examinations, studies conducted and treatments applied during the course of the disease. Objectives: To assess medical records registration quality of Internal Medicine doctor’s offices at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Location: Internal Medicine outpatient offices at Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Material: Clinical records of patients attended in Internal Medicine doctor’s offices. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-three medical records were collected by random sampling and subjected to a 10-items record audit, each rated at 10 points, for a total of 100 points. Items included date and time of care, neatness and legibility suitable record, vital signs, physical examination, diagnosis, plan of work, laboratory findings, complete treatment, and signature and stamp of the physician. Records with total score more than or equal to 80 were rated as ‘acceptable’, and all others as ‘need to improve’. Main outcome measures: ‘Acceptable’ or ‘need to improve’ medical records. Results: Two hundred and six (63.8%) clinical records were rated as ‘acceptable’ and 117 (36.2%) as ‘need to improve’. Items diagnosis and complete treatment presented poor registry more frequently, both in records with acceptable registry (filled in completely in 64.6% and 62.6% respectively) and those with need to improve registry (20.5% and 23.1% respectively). Signature and seal of the attending physician were the best items in both categories (99.5% and 93.2% respectively). Conclusions: More than half of the medical records had an acceptable quality at the Clinica Centenario Peruano Japonesa.El eje de la auditoria médica es una historia clínica adecuadamente confeccionada. La historia clínica es la constancia escrita de todos los exámenes médicos, estudios realizados y tratamientos aplicados durante el transcurso de la enfermedad. Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de registro de las historias clínicas de Consultorios Externos del Servicio de Medicina Interna en la Clínica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Diseño: Descriptivo de corte transversal. Lugar: Consultorios externos del Servicio de Medicina Interna de la Clínica Centenario Peruano Japonesa. Material: Historias clínicas de pacientes atendidos en la consulta externa del Servicio de Medicina Interna. Métodos: Se evaluó 323 historias clínicas mediante un muestreo aleatorio simple, las cuales fueron sometidas a una ficha de auditoría que comprendía 10 ítems, cada uno calificado con 10 puntos, para un total de 100 puntos: fecha y hora de atención, pulcritud y legibilidad, anamnesis adecuada, signos vitales, examen físico, diagnóstico, plan de trabajo, exámenes auxiliares, tratamiento completo y firma y sello del médico. Las historias que obtenían un puntaje total mayor o igual de 80 fueron calificadas como ‘aceptables’; las restantes como ‘falta mejorar’. Principales medidas de resultados: Historias auditadas aceptables o falta mejorar. Resultados: El 63,8% (206) de las historias tenía una calidad de registro ‘aceptable’, mientras que en 36,2% (117) de historias, la calidad de registro ‘falta mejorar’. Los ítems diagnóstico y tratamiento completo fueron los que presentaron un registro deficiente con mayor frecuencia, tanto en aquellas historias que cumplían un registro aceptable (64,6% y 62,6% llenadas de modo completo, respectivamente) como en aquellas con registro falta mejorar (20,5% y 23,1%, respectivamente). La firma y sello del médico tratante fue el ítem que en ambas categorías era el mejor registrado (99,5% y 93,2%, respectivamente). Conclusiones: Más de la mitad de las historias clínicas estudiadas cumplieron con una calidad de registro aceptable para los estándares en la Clínica Centenario Peruano Japonesa.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana2014-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/978110.15381/anales.v75i3.9781Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 75 No. 3 (2014); 251-257Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 75 Núm. 3 (2014); 251-2571609-94191025-5583reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/9781/8633Derechos de autor 2014 Juan P. Matzumura Kasano, Hugo Gutiérrez Crespo, Janeth Sotomayor Salas, Gabriela Pajuelo Carrascohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/97812020-04-16T18:43:26Z
score 13.958958
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).