Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts

Descripción del Articulo

This research is focused on establishing the load capacity of the rockbolts commonly used in Peru based on their length. Initially, we aimed to perform the pull tests on granite blocks at San Marcos University Campus, they were carried out under real operating mining conditions, at Reliquias, Castro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Giraldo Paredez, Emiliano Mauro
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2011
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/653
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/653
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUNMSM_ebcafc0a8dc556b1346806c8a91f362d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/653
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
Variabilidad de la capacidad de sostenimiento de un macizo rocoso Vs longitud de pernos de roca
title Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
spellingShingle Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
Giraldo Paredez, Emiliano Mauro
title_short Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
title_full Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
title_fullStr Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
title_full_unstemmed Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
title_sort Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockbolts
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Giraldo Paredez, Emiliano Mauro
author Giraldo Paredez, Emiliano Mauro
author_facet Giraldo Paredez, Emiliano Mauro
author_role author
description This research is focused on establishing the load capacity of the rockbolts commonly used in Peru based on their length. Initially, we aimed to perform the pull tests on granite blocks at San Marcos University Campus, they were carried out under real operating mining conditions, at Reliquias, Castrovirreyna Mining Company (Huancavelica) during March of the current year. The rockbolts tested were: Split Set, Threaded Rebars, Hydrabolt and Swellex, which were suitably conditioned to have an effective anchorage of 1 to 4 feet. The Split Set and Threaded Rebars were cut and delivered as per our request by PRODAC and Aceros Arequipa, respectively. Both, Hydrabolt and Swellex rockbolts, supplied by New Concept Mining and Atlas Copco, were piped around to allow the anchorage of the established lengths only. Fifty one tests were carried (11 Split Set, 17 Threaded Rebars, 12 Hydrabolts and 11 Swellex), and the results showed that the load capacity of the rockbolts does not keep any linear relation with their length, that is to say, for example, when we duplicate the length of a rockbolt, its load capacity not necessarily will be doubled. The elongation of the bolts tends to keep a linear relation with the applied load. Split Set, Hydrabolt and Swellex rockbolts showed an uniform anchorage changing their lengths, whereas the Threaded Rebars showed an irregular anchorage, especially when they were installed with cement. The rockbolts of major and minor load capacity per length are the Hydrabolts and the Split Set, for a 2 feet bond length of anchorage their capacities were 15,75 ton and 3,75 ton, respectively. The bolt that showed less elongation was the Hydrabolt and the one with the greatest the Split Set. The Rockbolt of lowest cost for m2 supported was the Hydrabolt ($10,95/m2) and the one with the highest cost the Swellex ($50,67/m2), costs worked out for a 7 foot rockbolt, prices of April, 2011, and according to the operating conditions at Reliquias Mine.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/653
10.15381/iigeo.v14i28.653
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/653
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/iigeo.v14i28.653
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/653/511
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2011 E. Mauro Giraldo Paredez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2011 E. Mauro Giraldo Paredez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ingeniería Geológica, Minera, Metalúrgica y Geográfica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ingeniería Geológica, Minera, Metalúrgica y Geográfica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista del Instituto de investigación de la Facultad de minas, metalurgia y ciencias geográficas; Vol. 14 No. 28 (2011)
Revista del Instituto de investigación de la Facultad de minas, metalurgia y ciencias geográficas; Vol. 14 Núm. 28 (2011)
1682-3087
1561-0888
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238284617580544
spelling Variability of rock mass support vs lengths of rockboltsVariabilidad de la capacidad de sostenimiento de un macizo rocoso Vs longitud de pernos de rocaGiraldo Paredez, Emiliano MauroThis research is focused on establishing the load capacity of the rockbolts commonly used in Peru based on their length. Initially, we aimed to perform the pull tests on granite blocks at San Marcos University Campus, they were carried out under real operating mining conditions, at Reliquias, Castrovirreyna Mining Company (Huancavelica) during March of the current year. The rockbolts tested were: Split Set, Threaded Rebars, Hydrabolt and Swellex, which were suitably conditioned to have an effective anchorage of 1 to 4 feet. The Split Set and Threaded Rebars were cut and delivered as per our request by PRODAC and Aceros Arequipa, respectively. Both, Hydrabolt and Swellex rockbolts, supplied by New Concept Mining and Atlas Copco, were piped around to allow the anchorage of the established lengths only. Fifty one tests were carried (11 Split Set, 17 Threaded Rebars, 12 Hydrabolts and 11 Swellex), and the results showed that the load capacity of the rockbolts does not keep any linear relation with their length, that is to say, for example, when we duplicate the length of a rockbolt, its load capacity not necessarily will be doubled. The elongation of the bolts tends to keep a linear relation with the applied load. Split Set, Hydrabolt and Swellex rockbolts showed an uniform anchorage changing their lengths, whereas the Threaded Rebars showed an irregular anchorage, especially when they were installed with cement. The rockbolts of major and minor load capacity per length are the Hydrabolts and the Split Set, for a 2 feet bond length of anchorage their capacities were 15,75 ton and 3,75 ton, respectively. The bolt that showed less elongation was the Hydrabolt and the one with the greatest the Split Set. The Rockbolt of lowest cost for m2 supported was the Hydrabolt ($10,95/m2) and the one with the highest cost the Swellex ($50,67/m2), costs worked out for a 7 foot rockbolt, prices of April, 2011, and according to the operating conditions at Reliquias Mine.Bajo el postulado: “Universidad = Investigación”, el presente estudio está enfocado en determinar la capacidad de anclaje de los pernos de roca más utilizados en el Perú y la relación existente con su longitud. Inicialmente, se planteó llevar a cabo las pruebas en bloques de granito dentro del campus de la UNMSM, pero por no reflejar las condiciones reales, se realizaron en la mina Reliquias de la Cía. Minera Castrovirreyna (Huancavelica), en el mes de marzo del año en curso. Los pernos estudiados fueron: Split Set, Barras Helicoidales, Hydrabolt y Swellex, convenientemente acondicionados para tener anclajes efectivos de 1, 2, 3 y 4 pies. Los Split Sets y Barras Helicoidales, fueron cortados y entregados así, por PRODAC y Aceros Arequipa, respectivamente. Los pernos inflables Hydrabolt y Swellex donados por New Concept Mining y Atlas Copco, fueron entubados para que se expandan únicamente en las longitudes efectivas de anclaje establecidas. Los resultados de las 51 pruebas realizadas (11 Split Set, 17 Barras Helicoidales, 12 Hydrabolts y 11 Swellex), demuestran que la capacidad de anclaje de los pernos no guarda una relación lineal con sus longitudes, es decir, al duplicar la longitud de un perno, su capacidad de anclaje no necesariamente será el doble. Asimismo, La elongación de los pernos, tiende a guardar una relación lineal con la carga aplicada. Los pernos Split Set, Hydrabolt y Swellex muestran un anclaje uniforme al variar las longitudes efectivas de anclaje; mientras que el comportamiento de las Barras Helicoidales es irregular, sobre todo cuando se instalan con cemento. Los pernos de mayor y menor capacidad son respectivamente, los Hydrabolts y los Split Sets, así, para 2 pies de longitud efectiva de anclaje sus capacidades son 15,75 ton y 3,75 ton, respectivamente. Los pernos que muestran menor y mayor elongación son los Hydrabolts y los Split Sets, respectivamente. Asimismo, el costo por metro cuadrado sostenido del más bajo al más alto son respectivamente: Hydrabolt (10,95 $/ m2) y la barra Helicoidal con resina (50,67 $/ m2), según análisis de costos al mes de Abril del 2011, y las condiciones y realidades encontradas en la mina Reliquias.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ingeniería Geológica, Minera, Metalúrgica y Geográfica2011-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/65310.15381/iigeo.v14i28.653Revista del Instituto de investigación de la Facultad de minas, metalurgia y ciencias geográficas; Vol. 14 No. 28 (2011)Revista del Instituto de investigación de la Facultad de minas, metalurgia y ciencias geográficas; Vol. 14 Núm. 28 (2011)1682-30871561-0888reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/653/511Derechos de autor 2011 E. Mauro Giraldo Paredezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/6532020-03-08T22:21:43Z
score 13.949927
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).