Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To compare the antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline gel and 0,12% chlorhexidine gel on the dental biofilm of healing abutments on dental implants. Methods. This was an in vitro experimental cross-sectional study. Twenty-five biofilm samples were taken from the dental biofilm present on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arízaga-Rujel, Gastón, Eugenia Guerrero, María, García-Linares, Sixto Angel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/19694
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/19694
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Dental biofilm
Tetracycline
Chlorhexidine
Dental implants
(source: MeSH NLM)
Biopelícula dental
Tetraciclina
Clorhexidina
Implantes dentales
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
id REVUNMSM_e90bbde8da09c33f3460eb37a66e309f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/19694
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutmentsEfecto antimicrobiano de tetraciclina 2% y clorhexidina 0,12% sobre biofilm dental de pilares de cicatrizaciónArízaga-Rujel, GastónEugenia Guerrero, MaríaGarcía-Linares, Sixto AngelDental biofilmTetracyclineChlorhexidineDental implants(source: MeSH NLM)Biopelícula dentalTetraciclinaClorhexidinaImplantes dentales(fuente: DeCS BIREME)Objective. To compare the antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline gel and 0,12% chlorhexidine gel on the dental biofilm of healing abutments on dental implants. Methods. This was an in vitro experimental cross-sectional study. Twenty-five biofilm samples were taken from the dental biofilm present on the area in contact with mucosa and the peri-implant groove of healing abutments of 19 patients. The samples were sowed in Petri dishes with Schaedler agar, three wells were made with a sterile punch and in each one tetracycline 2% in gel, 0,12% chlorhexidine in gel, and distilled water were placed in equal quantities. Then Petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C in an anaerobic medium for 48 hours after which inhibition halos were measured. Results. Both gels were inhibitors of dental biofilm growth. Tetracycline 2% in gel obtained larger diameters of inhibition halos than chlorhexidine 0,12% in gel, with a maximum of 51 mm and 17 mm respectively and a minimum of 21 mm and 10 mm, with means of 35 mm and 12.84 mm respectively. Conclusions. Tetracycline at 2% in gel had a higher antimicrobial effect than 0,12% in gel chlorhexidine on dental biofilm taken from healing abutments of dental implants.Objetivo. Comparar el efecto antimicrobiano de la tetraciclina en gel al 2% y de la clorhexidina en gel al 0,12% sobre el biofilm dental de pilares de cicatrización en implantes dentales. Métodos. Estudio experimental en laboratorio, de corte transversal. Se tomaron 25 muestras de biofilm dental presente en los pilares de cicatrización de implantes dentales de la zona en contacto con la mucosa del surco periimplantario de 19 pacientes. Las muestras fueron sembradas en placas Petri con agar Schaedler, a las cuales se les hizo tres pocillos, en uno se colocó tetraciclina en gel al 2%, en otro clorhexidina en gel al 0,12% y en el último agua destilada en cantidades iguales. Las placas Petri fueron incubadas a 37 °C en medio anaerobio por 96 horas luego de los cuales se midieron los halos de inhibición. Resultados. Ambos geles inhibieron el crecimiento de biofilm dental. La tetraciclina en gel al 2% obtuvo mayores diámetros de halos de inhibición que la clorhexidina en gel al 0,12%, con un máximo de 51 mm y 17 mm respectivamente y un mínimo de 21 mm y 10 mm respectivamente, con medias de 35 mm y 12.84 mm respectivamente. Conclusiones. La tetraciclina en gel al 2% tuvo un mayor efecto antimicrobiano en comparación a la clorhexidina en gel al 0,12% sobre el biofilm dental tomado de pilares de cicatrización de implantes dentales.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología2021-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/1969410.15381/os.v24i1.19694Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021); 27-33Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2021); 27-331609-86171560-9111reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/19694/16348Derechos de autor 2021 Gastón Arízaga-Rujel, María Eugenia Guerrero, Sixto Angel García-Linareshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/196942021-07-01T10:19:32Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
Efecto antimicrobiano de tetraciclina 2% y clorhexidina 0,12% sobre biofilm dental de pilares de cicatrización
title Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
spellingShingle Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
Arízaga-Rujel, Gastón
Dental biofilm
Tetracycline
Chlorhexidine
Dental implants
(source: MeSH NLM)
Biopelícula dental
Tetraciclina
Clorhexidina
Implantes dentales
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
title_short Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
title_full Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
title_fullStr Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
title_sort Antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline and 0,12% chlorhexidine on dental biofilm of healing abutments
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arízaga-Rujel, Gastón
Eugenia Guerrero, María
García-Linares, Sixto Angel
author Arízaga-Rujel, Gastón
author_facet Arízaga-Rujel, Gastón
Eugenia Guerrero, María
García-Linares, Sixto Angel
author_role author
author2 Eugenia Guerrero, María
García-Linares, Sixto Angel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dental biofilm
Tetracycline
Chlorhexidine
Dental implants
(source: MeSH NLM)
Biopelícula dental
Tetraciclina
Clorhexidina
Implantes dentales
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
topic Dental biofilm
Tetracycline
Chlorhexidine
Dental implants
(source: MeSH NLM)
Biopelícula dental
Tetraciclina
Clorhexidina
Implantes dentales
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
description Objective. To compare the antimicrobial effect of 2% tetracycline gel and 0,12% chlorhexidine gel on the dental biofilm of healing abutments on dental implants. Methods. This was an in vitro experimental cross-sectional study. Twenty-five biofilm samples were taken from the dental biofilm present on the area in contact with mucosa and the peri-implant groove of healing abutments of 19 patients. The samples were sowed in Petri dishes with Schaedler agar, three wells were made with a sterile punch and in each one tetracycline 2% in gel, 0,12% chlorhexidine in gel, and distilled water were placed in equal quantities. Then Petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C in an anaerobic medium for 48 hours after which inhibition halos were measured. Results. Both gels were inhibitors of dental biofilm growth. Tetracycline 2% in gel obtained larger diameters of inhibition halos than chlorhexidine 0,12% in gel, with a maximum of 51 mm and 17 mm respectively and a minimum of 21 mm and 10 mm, with means of 35 mm and 12.84 mm respectively. Conclusions. Tetracycline at 2% in gel had a higher antimicrobial effect than 0,12% in gel chlorhexidine on dental biofilm taken from healing abutments of dental implants.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/19694
10.15381/os.v24i1.19694
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/19694
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/os.v24i1.19694
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/19694/16348
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Gastón Arízaga-Rujel, María Eugenia Guerrero, Sixto Angel García-Linares
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Gastón Arízaga-Rujel, María Eugenia Guerrero, Sixto Angel García-Linares
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021); 27-33
Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2021); 27-33
1609-8617
1560-9111
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238212818436096
score 13.95948
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).