Velasco and commemoration policies sesquicentennial in Peru

Descripción del Articulo

The celebration for the 150 years of the independence of Peru was an exceptional juncture for Velasco to promote his cultural policy, carrying out an intense revisionist activity to rewrite history, resignifying in memory the sense of independence, promoting the State through its institutions a uniq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Chaupis Torres, José
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23873
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23873
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Sesquicentennial
cultural politics
Velasco
traditional historiography
New History
Sesquicentenario
política cultural
historiografía tradicional
Nueva Historia
Descripción
Sumario:The celebration for the 150 years of the independence of Peru was an exceptional juncture for Velasco to promote his cultural policy, carrying out an intense revisionist activity to rewrite history, resignifying in memory the sense of independence, promoting the State through its institutions a unique official imaginary, to justify their actions defining identities in the present to achieve a desired future, at a juncture of historiographic turn where traditional history - whose representatives would make up the National Commission of the Sesquicentennial of the Independence of Peru (CNSIP) - was being questioned by the emerging New History. The article will be organized in three sections, in the first, the cultural policy of Velasquismo will be studied based on its constitutive elements, which tried to institutionally legitimize the military government. In the second, the structure of the celebrations will be studied, which would articulate the memory recreated by the military in the commemoration and the history investigated by the historians of the CNSIP on what was commemorated. In the third, we will analyze the debate between the officials of the regime, members of the CNSIP, the teachers› union and the historians of the New History fighting for the meaning of the past.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).