Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis

Descripción del Articulo

35 Control: A total of 100 subjects distributed as follows 21 with pyelonephritis was studied as a single diagnosis; 26 with pyelonephritis associated with other processes; TBC 8 kidney and pyelonephritis probable; and 10 with various diagnoses. In finding all the "cells of pyelonephritis"...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Talledo C., Oscar E.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:1957
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10775
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/10775
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUNMSM_cd8d65417837c08a863a7d02317631fd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10775
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritisContribución al diagnóstico de las pielonefritisTalledo C., Oscar E.35 Control: A total of 100 subjects distributed as follows 21 with pyelonephritis was studied as a single diagnosis; 26 with pyelonephritis associated with other processes; TBC 8 kidney and pyelonephritis probable; and 10 with various diagnoses. In finding all the "cells of pyelonephritis" was performed and in most qualitative urine culture done. In 11 no histopathological report. In the control subjects, the finding was negative cells in all. Urine cultures were negative in 2. In subjects with pyelonephritis as a single diagnosis, the cells were found in 95.4%. Urine culture was positive in 94.1% of cases studied. In the group of pyelonephritis associated with other processes, there were cells in the presence of 88.4% and the urine culture was positive in 91.3% of the cases studied. In TBC kidney and pyelonephritis likely cells was found in 87.5%; and 100% of urine was positive. The "diverse" group in any cell was found in 2 of them the urine culture was positive. Of the 45 positive urine cultures, 50% were Escherichia coli; Paracolon gender 27.2%; 15.1% and Staphylococcus Protsus gender; Klebsiella 9.09%; Streptococcus 6.06%; 3.03% Alcalígenos Diphtheroids faecalis and Bacillus and Neisseria 1.01%.Se estudió un total de 100 sujetos distribuidos en la forma siguiente: 35 de control : 21 con pielonefritis como diagnóstico único; 26 con pielonefritis asociada a otros procesos; 8 con TBC renal y pielonefritis probable; y 10 con diagnósticos diversos. En todos ellos se realizó la búsqueda de las "células de pielonefritis" y en la mayoría se hizo el urocultivo cualitativo. En 11 hay informe histopatológico. En los sujetos de control, el hallazgo de las células fué negativo en todos. El urocultívo fué negativo en 2. En los sujetos con pielonefritis como diagnóstico único, se encontraron las células en el 95.4%. El urocultivo fué positivo en el 94.1% de lo casos estudiados. En el grupo de pielonefritis asociada a otros procesos, hubo presencia de células en el 88.4% y el urocultivo fué positivo en el 91.3% de los casos estudiados. En los de TBC renal y pielonefritis probable, se encontró células en el 87.5%; y el 100% de los urocultivos fué positivo. En el grupo "diversos", en ninguno se encontró células y en 2 de ellos el urocultivo fué positivo. De los 45 urocultivos positivos, el 50% correspondió a la Escherichia Colí; 27.2% al género Paracolon; 15.1% al género Protsus y Estafilococo; 9.09% Klebsiella; 6.06% Estreptococo; 3.03% Alcalígenos Fecalis y Bacilos Difteroides y 1.01% a la Neisseria.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana1957-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/1077510.15381/anales.v40i3.10775Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 40 No. 3 (1957); 585-604Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 40 Núm. 3 (1957); 585-6041609-94191025-5583reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/10775/9586Derechos de autor 1957 Oscar E. Talledo C.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/107752020-04-08T11:17:52Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
Contribución al diagnóstico de las pielonefritis
title Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
spellingShingle Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
Talledo C., Oscar E.
title_short Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
title_full Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
title_fullStr Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
title_full_unstemmed Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
title_sort Contribution to the diagnosis of pyelonephritis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Talledo C., Oscar E.
author Talledo C., Oscar E.
author_facet Talledo C., Oscar E.
author_role author
description 35 Control: A total of 100 subjects distributed as follows 21 with pyelonephritis was studied as a single diagnosis; 26 with pyelonephritis associated with other processes; TBC 8 kidney and pyelonephritis probable; and 10 with various diagnoses. In finding all the "cells of pyelonephritis" was performed and in most qualitative urine culture done. In 11 no histopathological report. In the control subjects, the finding was negative cells in all. Urine cultures were negative in 2. In subjects with pyelonephritis as a single diagnosis, the cells were found in 95.4%. Urine culture was positive in 94.1% of cases studied. In the group of pyelonephritis associated with other processes, there were cells in the presence of 88.4% and the urine culture was positive in 91.3% of the cases studied. In TBC kidney and pyelonephritis likely cells was found in 87.5%; and 100% of urine was positive. The "diverse" group in any cell was found in 2 of them the urine culture was positive. Of the 45 positive urine cultures, 50% were Escherichia coli; Paracolon gender 27.2%; 15.1% and Staphylococcus Protsus gender; Klebsiella 9.09%; Streptococcus 6.06%; 3.03% Alcalígenos Diphtheroids faecalis and Bacillus and Neisseria 1.01%.
publishDate 1957
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1957-09-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/10775
10.15381/anales.v40i3.10775
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/10775
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/anales.v40i3.10775
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/10775/9586
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 1957 Oscar E. Talledo C.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 1957 Oscar E. Talledo C.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 40 No. 3 (1957); 585-604
Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 40 Núm. 3 (1957); 585-604
1609-9419
1025-5583
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238254311636992
score 13.915584
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).