Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits

Descripción del Articulo

The efficacy of preventive analgesia and the cardiopulmonary effects of morphine or methadone in rabbits undergoing experimental skin surgery were evaluated and compared. Thirty-six rabbits were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: Control, Morphine, and Methadone. The rabbits received mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vieira Nobre, Camila, Uscategui, Ricardo A. R., Noriega, Jorge, Gasser, Beatriz, Morais Pazzini, Josiane, Tavares de Almeida, Vívian, Barboza de Nardi, Andrigo, Newton de Andrade, James
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23358
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/23358
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:analgesia
analgesic rescue
methadone
morphine
respiratory depression
rescate analgésico
metadona
morfina
depresión respiratoria
id REVUNMSM_c59788529ef35b1616d0876954f6b555
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23358
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
Eficacia y seguridad de morfina y metadona como analgésicos en un protocolo anestésico balanceado en conejos
title Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
spellingShingle Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
Vieira Nobre, Camila
analgesia
analgesic rescue
methadone
morphine
respiratory depression
analgesia
rescate analgésico
metadona
morfina
depresión respiratoria
title_short Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
title_full Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
title_sort Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vieira Nobre, Camila
Uscategui, Ricardo A. R.
Noriega, Jorge
Gasser, Beatriz
Morais Pazzini, Josiane
Tavares de Almeida, Vívian
Barboza de Nardi, Andrigo
Newton de Andrade, James
Vieira Nobre, Camila
Uscategui, Ricardo A. R.
Noriega, Jorge
Gasser, Beatriz
Morais Pazzini, Josiane
Tavares de Almeida, Vívian
Barboza de Nardi, Andrigo
Newton de Andrade, James
author Vieira Nobre, Camila
author_facet Vieira Nobre, Camila
Uscategui, Ricardo A. R.
Noriega, Jorge
Gasser, Beatriz
Morais Pazzini, Josiane
Tavares de Almeida, Vívian
Barboza de Nardi, Andrigo
Newton de Andrade, James
author_role author
author2 Uscategui, Ricardo A. R.
Noriega, Jorge
Gasser, Beatriz
Morais Pazzini, Josiane
Tavares de Almeida, Vívian
Barboza de Nardi, Andrigo
Newton de Andrade, James
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv analgesia
analgesic rescue
methadone
morphine
respiratory depression
analgesia
rescate analgésico
metadona
morfina
depresión respiratoria
topic analgesia
analgesic rescue
methadone
morphine
respiratory depression
analgesia
rescate analgésico
metadona
morfina
depresión respiratoria
description The efficacy of preventive analgesia and the cardiopulmonary effects of morphine or methadone in rabbits undergoing experimental skin surgery were evaluated and compared. Thirty-six rabbits were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: Control, Morphine, and Methadone. The rabbits received midazolam 1 mg/kg IM associated with: placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 0.05 ml/kg, methadone 0.5 mg/kg or morphine 0.5 mg/kg, depending on the experimental group. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane. Heart (HR) and respiratory (fR) rates, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and body temperature were assessed every 10 minutes. Electrocardiographic examination was performed after sedation, in the trans and immediate postoperative period. After procedure, the control group received tramadol 5 mg/kg IV. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Von-Frey filament stimulation responses. All variables were compared between groups by ANOVA or Friedman. Methadone and morphine caused an increase in MAP (p=0.0112) and a decrease in HR (p=0.0001). fR and SpO2 were reduced in the methadone group (p=0.0100). The response to Von-Frey filaments (p=0.6824) and VAS (p=0.7661) were similar between treatments, however, the control group presented a higher proportion of analgesic rescue (33%) compared to morphine (19%) and methadone (12%). Electrocardiographic variables were similar between treatments (p>0.05). In conclusion, preventive treatment with morphine or methadone was effective in controlling trans and postoperative pain in rabbits, and its cardiovascular effects were limited; however, methadone caused marked respiratory depression.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/23358
10.15381/rivep.v33i4.23358
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/23358
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v33i4.23358
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/23358/18629
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 Núm. 4 (2022); e23358
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2022); e23358
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238238459265024
spelling Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbitsEficacia y seguridad de morfina y metadona como analgésicos en un protocolo anestésico balanceado en conejosVieira Nobre, CamilaUscategui, Ricardo A. R.Noriega, JorgeGasser, BeatrizMorais Pazzini, JosianeTavares de Almeida, VívianBarboza de Nardi, AndrigoNewton de Andrade, JamesVieira Nobre, CamilaUscategui, Ricardo A. R.Noriega, JorgeGasser, BeatrizMorais Pazzini, JosianeTavares de Almeida, VívianBarboza de Nardi, AndrigoNewton de Andrade, Jamesanalgesiaanalgesic rescuemethadonemorphinerespiratory depressionanalgesiarescate analgésicometadonamorfinadepresión respiratoriaThe efficacy of preventive analgesia and the cardiopulmonary effects of morphine or methadone in rabbits undergoing experimental skin surgery were evaluated and compared. Thirty-six rabbits were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: Control, Morphine, and Methadone. The rabbits received midazolam 1 mg/kg IM associated with: placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 0.05 ml/kg, methadone 0.5 mg/kg or morphine 0.5 mg/kg, depending on the experimental group. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane. Heart (HR) and respiratory (fR) rates, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and body temperature were assessed every 10 minutes. Electrocardiographic examination was performed after sedation, in the trans and immediate postoperative period. After procedure, the control group received tramadol 5 mg/kg IV. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Von-Frey filament stimulation responses. All variables were compared between groups by ANOVA or Friedman. Methadone and morphine caused an increase in MAP (p=0.0112) and a decrease in HR (p=0.0001). fR and SpO2 were reduced in the methadone group (p=0.0100). The response to Von-Frey filaments (p=0.6824) and VAS (p=0.7661) were similar between treatments, however, the control group presented a higher proportion of analgesic rescue (33%) compared to morphine (19%) and methadone (12%). Electrocardiographic variables were similar between treatments (p>0.05). In conclusion, preventive treatment with morphine or methadone was effective in controlling trans and postoperative pain in rabbits, and its cardiovascular effects were limited; however, methadone caused marked respiratory depression.Se evaluó y comparó la eficacia de la analgesia preventiva y los efectos cardiopulmonares de morfina o metadona en conejos sometidos a cirugía cutánea experimental. Treinta y seis conejos fueron asignados al azar a tres grupos experimentales: Control, Morfina y Metadona. Los conejos recibieron midazolam 1 mg/kg vía IM asociado a: placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 0.05 ml/kg, metadona 0.5 mg/kg o morfina 0.5 mg/kg, según el grupo experimental. La anestesia fue inducida y mantenida con isoflurano. La frecuencia cardíaca (FC) y respiratoria (fR), la saturación periférica de oxígeno (SpO2), la presión arterial media (PAM) y la temperatura corporal se evaluaron cada 10 minutos. Se realizó examen electrocardiográfico después de la sedación, en el trans y posoperatorio inmediato. Después del procedimiento, el grupo control recibió tramadol 5 mg/kg vía IV. La analgesia posoperatoria fue evaluada mediante la escala analógica visual (VAS) y la respuesta a estímulos con filamentos de Von-Frey. Todas las variables se compararon entre los grupos mediante ANOVA o Friedman. Metadona y morfina causaron aumento de PAM (p=0.0112) y reducción de la fR (p=0.0001). La fR y la SpO2 se redujeron en el grupo de metadona (p=0.0100). La respuesta a los filamentos de Von-Frey (p=0.6824) y la VAS (p=0.7661) fueron similares entre tratamientos, sin embargo, el grupo control presentó una mayor proporción de rescate analgésico (33%) en comparación con la morfina (19%) y la metadona (12%). Las variables electrocardiográficas fueron similares entre tratamientos (p>0.05). En conclusión, el tratamiento preventivo con morfina o metadona resultó eficaz para controlar el dolor trans y posoperatorio en conejos y sus efectos cardiovasculares fueron limitados; sin embargo, la metadona ocasionó depresión respiratoria marcada.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/2335810.15381/rivep.v33i4.23358Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 Núm. 4 (2022); e23358Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2022); e233581682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/23358/18629Derechos de autor 2022 Camila Vieira Nobre, Ricardo A. R. Uscategui, Jorge Noriega, Beatriz Gasser, Josiane Morais Pazzini, Vívian Tavares de Almeida, Andrigo Barboza de Nardi, James Newton de Andradehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/233582022-09-06T13:37:39Z
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).