Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases

Descripción del Articulo

This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Cabrera Febola, Walter
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2008
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1692
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUNMSM_c0e17a71bce9d65a133e8ac65b6c3b0b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1692
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological casesPerspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicosCabrera Febola, WalterThis book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved.This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas2008-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/169210.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 143-144Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 143-1441727-99331561-0837reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692/1467Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febolahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/16922020-05-22T12:04:30Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos
title Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
spellingShingle Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
Cabrera Febola, Walter
title_short Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
title_full Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
title_fullStr Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
title_full_unstemmed Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
title_sort Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cabrera Febola, Walter
author Cabrera Febola, Walter
author_facet Cabrera Febola, Walter
author_role author
description This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692
10.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692/1467
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febola
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febola
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 143-144
Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 143-144
1727-9933
1561-0837
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238306058862592
score 13.785607
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).