Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ)
Descripción del Articulo
Social factors influence the evolution of Constitutional Law. However, the Philosophy of Constitutional Law, by making a rational study of the regulations, in a universal social context, proposes alternatives in the search for solutions. In this scenario, this research work is carried out, on “The C...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23503 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura filosofía del derecho constitucional Junta Nacional de Justicia Tribunal Constitucional National Council of the Judiciary Philosophy of Constitutional Law Constitutional interpretation National Board of Justice Constitutional Court |
id |
REVUNMSM_adbff603cefefe141214b140a97c513b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23503 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ)Filosofía del derecho constitucional: análisis de las resoluciones del Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura, hoy Junta Nacional de Justicia (JNJ)Zelada Flores, Jaime AlejandroZelada Flores, Jaime AlejandroConsejo Nacional de la Magistraturafilosofía del derecho constitucionalJunta Nacional de JusticiaTribunal ConstitucionalNational Council of the JudiciaryPhilosophy of Constitutional LawConstitutional interpretationNational Board of JusticeConstitutional CourtSocial factors influence the evolution of Constitutional Law. However, the Philosophy of Constitutional Law, by making a rational study of the regulations, in a universal social context, proposes alternatives in the search for solutions. In this scenario, this research work is carried out, on “The Constitutional Court and the Interpretation of the Resolutions issued by the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of magistrates” and analyzing the Resolutions of the National Council of the Magistrature, today JNJ, within a socio-legal context. In this regard, Article 142 of the 1993 Constitution, regulates that: “The resolutions of the National Elections Jury, in electoral matters, nor those of the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of elections, are not reviewable in court. judges”. However, the Constitutional Court interpreted that the filing and declaration as founded of a claim for amparo against the CNM is feasible. In that sense and after carrying out the study of the sentences issued, on this particular, it is observed that the interpretation work carried out exceeds the limits of this Institution; constitutional reform being appropriate.Los factores sociales influyen en la evolución del derecho constitucional. Sin embargo, la filosofía del derecho constitucional, al hacer un estudio racional de la normativa, en un contexto social-universal, propone alternativas en la búsqueda de soluciones. En ese escenario se realiza este trabajo de investigación sobre el Tribunal Constitucional y la interpretación de las resoluciones emitidas por el Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura (CNM) en materia de evaluación y ratificación de magistrados, mediante el análisis de las resoluciones del Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura, hoy Junta Nacional de Justicia ( JNJ), dentro de un contexto sociojurídico. Al respecto, el artículo 142 de la Constitución de 1993 regula que: “No son revisables en sede judicial las resoluciones del Jurado Nacional de Elecciones, en materia electoral, ni las del Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura en materia de evaluación y ratificación de jueces”. Sin embargo, el Tribunal Constitucional interpretó que es factible la interposición y declaración como fundada de una demanda de amparo contra el CNM. En ese sentido y luego de realizar el estudio de las sentencias expedidas, sobre este particular, se observa que la labor de interpretación realizada excede los límites de esta institución y es, por tanto, apropiada la reforma constitucional.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas2022-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/2350310.15381/tesis.v15i20.23503Tesis (Lima); Vol. 15 No. 20 (2022): January - June; 63-73Tesis (Lima); Vol. 15 Núm. 20 (2022): Enero - Junio; 63-732707-63341995-696710.15381/tesis.v15i20reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503/18577https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503/18656Derechos de autor 2022 Jaime Alejandro Zelada Floreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/235032022-10-05T16:27:51Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) Filosofía del derecho constitucional: análisis de las resoluciones del Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura, hoy Junta Nacional de Justicia (JNJ) |
title |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) Zelada Flores, Jaime Alejandro Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura filosofía del derecho constitucional Junta Nacional de Justicia Tribunal Constitucional National Council of the Judiciary Philosophy of Constitutional Law Constitutional interpretation National Board of Justice Constitutional Court |
title_short |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
title_full |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
title_fullStr |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
title_sort |
Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Zelada Flores, Jaime Alejandro Zelada Flores, Jaime Alejandro |
author |
Zelada Flores, Jaime Alejandro |
author_facet |
Zelada Flores, Jaime Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura filosofía del derecho constitucional Junta Nacional de Justicia Tribunal Constitucional National Council of the Judiciary Philosophy of Constitutional Law Constitutional interpretation National Board of Justice Constitutional Court |
topic |
Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura filosofía del derecho constitucional Junta Nacional de Justicia Tribunal Constitucional National Council of the Judiciary Philosophy of Constitutional Law Constitutional interpretation National Board of Justice Constitutional Court |
description |
Social factors influence the evolution of Constitutional Law. However, the Philosophy of Constitutional Law, by making a rational study of the regulations, in a universal social context, proposes alternatives in the search for solutions. In this scenario, this research work is carried out, on “The Constitutional Court and the Interpretation of the Resolutions issued by the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of magistrates” and analyzing the Resolutions of the National Council of the Magistrature, today JNJ, within a socio-legal context. In this regard, Article 142 of the 1993 Constitution, regulates that: “The resolutions of the National Elections Jury, in electoral matters, nor those of the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of elections, are not reviewable in court. judges”. However, the Constitutional Court interpreted that the filing and declaration as founded of a claim for amparo against the CNM is feasible. In that sense and after carrying out the study of the sentences issued, on this particular, it is observed that the interpretation work carried out exceeds the limits of this Institution; constitutional reform being appropriate. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503 10.15381/tesis.v15i20.23503 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/tesis.v15i20.23503 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503/18577 https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/tesis/article/view/23503/18656 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Jaime Alejandro Zelada Flores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Jaime Alejandro Zelada Flores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Tesis (Lima); Vol. 15 No. 20 (2022): January - June; 63-73 Tesis (Lima); Vol. 15 Núm. 20 (2022): Enero - Junio; 63-73 2707-6334 1995-6967 10.15381/tesis.v15i20 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238325529870336 |
score |
13.78462 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).