“And they say that [they] worship stones”: Guaman Poma de Ayala and the discursive construction of Indigenous idolatries

Descripción del Articulo

This essay studies Guaman Poma de Ayala’s narrative strategies to address ideas about materiality in Andean culture. It focuses on the descriptive systems and classifcations that are displayed along the Nueva corónica y buen gobierno to textually reconstruct the material dimension of what was called...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: León-Llerena, Laura
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17969
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/revistaLetras/article/view/17969
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Materialidad
Huaca
Idolatría
Heterogeneidad
Conversión
Felipe Guamán Poma de Ayala
Materiality
Idolatry
Heterogeneity
Conversion
Descripción
Sumario:This essay studies Guaman Poma de Ayala’s narrative strategies to address ideas about materiality in Andean culture. It focuses on the descriptive systems and classifcations that are displayed along the Nueva corónica y buen gobierno to textually reconstruct the material dimension of what was called “idolatry”. The chronicler was Cristóbal de Albornoz’s assistant. Albornoz authored one of the frst treatises about the extirpation of idolatries. Guaman Poma included in his work information collected during his time with Albornoz about diverse objects that were classifed as idolatric. The Andean author agreed with Albornoz on the necessity to eradicate Indigenous objects and the rituals associated with them because these posed obstacles to the conversion of the Indians to Christianity. One can observe, however, that in Guaman Poma’s text there is a discursive tension that is absent in Albornoz’s writings. This is evidence of the resistant heterogeneity of Andean cultures before the homogeneizing process of discourses about “idolatries”.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).