Topographic evaluation of reciprocating files, after instrumentation in curved canals. Ex vivo study

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To evaluate the wear (roughness) and topographic changes of the Wave One Gold primary and Reciproc Blue R25 files after instrumentation at 3, 6 and 9 uses in curved canals. Methods. Ex vivo study, consisting of 10 new Reciproc Blue R25 and 5 Wave One Gold primary reciprocating files and 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Navarrete Llamatumbi, María Teresa, Terán Ayala, Silvana Beatriz, Guillen Guillen, Raquel Esmeralda, Hidalgo Moya, Viviana Marcela, Plaza Espinoza, Diana Elizabeth
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/24450
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/24450
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Endodontics
Instrumentation
Microscopy electron scanning
Endodoncia
Instrumentación
Microscopia electrónica de barrido
Descripción
Sumario:Objective. To evaluate the wear (roughness) and topographic changes of the Wave One Gold primary and Reciproc Blue R25 files after instrumentation at 3, 6 and 9 uses in curved canals. Methods. Ex vivo study, consisting of 10 new Reciproc Blue R25 and 5 Wave One Gold primary reciprocating files and 46 mandibular first molars with severe curvature. Molars were divided into 2 groups (23 molars in each group): group 1 Reciproc Blue R25/.08 and group 2 Wave One Gold Primary (25/.07). Reciprocating files from the two groups were analyzed with the contact profilometer at 0, 3, 6 and 9 uses. The measurement was made in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds, and in each analysis, 2 files were observed with the Scanning Electron Microscope. Subsequently, the analysis in the SPSS version 26 IBM ® program was performed using t-Student and Anova tests for normality (p<0.05). Results. There is no significant difference between Wave One Gold primary and Reciproc Blue R25 (p>0.05) in any third of the file; however, there is a significant difference in the wear of the file after the ninth use at the three third levels: apical (p<0.001), middle (p=0.05), cervical (p=0.01). Conclusions. Wave One Gold primary and Reciproc Blue R25 files present superficial changes from the instrumentation of four root canals, the greatest deformation of the files occured at the apical level. The greater the use of the files, the greater the wear of the surface.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).