Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy
Descripción del Articulo
This article has as its central argument that cultural policy and management in Peru occurs in a context of disjointed dynamics and precarious consolidation, which destabilizes, but at the same time requires, an articulating narrative of its guiding framework, the National Cultural Policy 2030. In p...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/26648 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/26648 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | políticas culturales Perú política nacional de cultura gestión cultural pública interculturalidad industrias culturales patrimonio cultural policies Peru national cultural policy public cultural management interculturality cultural industries heritage |
id |
REVUNMSM_09b5ffd947fa18a71d1e1a69ea29e354 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/26648 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy Política cultural en contextos de crisis: las encrucijadas de la Política Nacional de Cultura del Perú al 2030 |
title |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
spellingShingle |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy Lossio Chávez, Félix Antonio políticas culturales Perú política nacional de cultura gestión cultural pública interculturalidad industrias culturales patrimonio cultural policies Peru national cultural policy public cultural management interculturality cultural industries heritage |
title_short |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
title_full |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
title_fullStr |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
title_sort |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture Policy |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lossio Chávez, Félix Antonio Lossio Chávez, Félix Antonio |
author |
Lossio Chávez, Félix Antonio |
author_facet |
Lossio Chávez, Félix Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
políticas culturales Perú política nacional de cultura gestión cultural pública interculturalidad industrias culturales patrimonio cultural policies Peru national cultural policy public cultural management interculturality cultural industries heritage |
topic |
políticas culturales Perú política nacional de cultura gestión cultural pública interculturalidad industrias culturales patrimonio cultural policies Peru national cultural policy public cultural management interculturality cultural industries heritage |
description |
This article has as its central argument that cultural policy and management in Peru occurs in a context of disjointed dynamics and precarious consolidation, which destabilizes, but at the same time requires, an articulating narrative of its guiding framework, the National Cultural Policy 2030. In particular, it is argued that the scenario that defines current cultural policy and management in Peru is characterized, on the one hand, by notable advances from both civil society and the public and private sector in different aspects of the cultural field, as well as as well as the affirmation of consensus in relation to new approaches for the development of the cultural sector. But also, and simultaneously, characterized by an institutional-administrative uncertainty, the multiple crises and the absence of political horizons in relation to the field of culture. This results in a National Cultural Policy 2030 (PNC 2030) that is based on necessary premises and approaches in tune with the global cultural agenda, which is based on solid evidence and that outlines necessary objectives for strengthening the sector in the country; but which is uncertain regarding its sustainability, results and social legitimacy. Therefore, this article suggests that the main challenge of the PNC 2030 —and cultural management in Peru— is to act in a scenario without guarantees and, from there, recover its ethical-political dimension using the tools of public administration. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer review article Artículo evaluado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/26648 10.15381/rsoc.n36.26648 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/26648 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rsoc.n36.26648 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/26648/20298 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2023 Félix Antonio Lossio Chávez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2023 Félix Antonio Lossio Chávez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Sociología; No. 36 (2023); 81-106 Revista de Sociología; Núm. 36 (2023); 81-106 1609-7580 1605-8933 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238283098193920 |
spelling |
Cultural policy in crisis contexts: the crossroads of the National Culture PolicyPolítica cultural en contextos de crisis: las encrucijadas de la Política Nacional de Cultura del Perú al 2030Lossio Chávez, Félix AntonioLossio Chávez, Félix Antoniopolíticas culturalesPerúpolítica nacional de culturagestión cultural públicainterculturalidadindustrias culturalespatrimoniocultural policiesPerunational cultural policypublic cultural managementinterculturalitycultural industriesheritageThis article has as its central argument that cultural policy and management in Peru occurs in a context of disjointed dynamics and precarious consolidation, which destabilizes, but at the same time requires, an articulating narrative of its guiding framework, the National Cultural Policy 2030. In particular, it is argued that the scenario that defines current cultural policy and management in Peru is characterized, on the one hand, by notable advances from both civil society and the public and private sector in different aspects of the cultural field, as well as as well as the affirmation of consensus in relation to new approaches for the development of the cultural sector. But also, and simultaneously, characterized by an institutional-administrative uncertainty, the multiple crises and the absence of political horizons in relation to the field of culture. This results in a National Cultural Policy 2030 (PNC 2030) that is based on necessary premises and approaches in tune with the global cultural agenda, which is based on solid evidence and that outlines necessary objectives for strengthening the sector in the country; but which is uncertain regarding its sustainability, results and social legitimacy. Therefore, this article suggests that the main challenge of the PNC 2030 —and cultural management in Peru— is to act in a scenario without guarantees and, from there, recover its ethical-political dimension using the tools of public administration.Este artículo tiene como argumento central que la política y gestión cultural en el Perú ocurre en un contexto de dinamismos desarticulados y consolidación precaria, lo que desestabiliza, pero al mismo tiempo exige, una narrativa articuladora de su marco orientador, la Política Nacional de Cultura al 2030. En particular, se sostiene que el escenario que define la política y gestión cultural actual en el Perú se caracteriza, por un lado, por avances notables tanto desde la sociedad civil como del sector público y privado en distintos aspectos del campo cultural, así como por la afirmación de consensos con relación a nuevos enfoques para el desarrollo del sector. Pero también, y en simultáneo, por la incertidumbre institucional-administrativa, las múltiples crisis y la ausencia de horizontes políticos con relación al campo de la cultura. Ello, tiene como resultado una Política Nacional de Cultura al 2030 (PNC 2030) que parte de premisas necesarias y enfoques en sintonía con la agenda cultura global, que se basa en evidencias sólidas y que traza objetivos necesarios para el fortalecimiento del sector en el país; pero que es incierta respecto a su sostenibilidad, resultados y legitimidad social. Entonces, este artículo sugiere que la PNC 2030 —y la gestión cultural en el Perú— tienen como principal desafío actuar en un escenario sin garantías y, desde allí, recuperar su dimensión ético-política haciendo uso de las herramientas de la administración pública.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales2023-10-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer review articleArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/2664810.15381/rsoc.n36.26648Revista de Sociología; No. 36 (2023); 81-106Revista de Sociología; Núm. 36 (2023); 81-1061609-75801605-8933reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociologia/article/view/26648/20298Derechos de autor 2023 Félix Antonio Lossio Chávezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/266482023-11-20T11:20:52Z |
score |
13.958958 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).