Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019

Descripción del Articulo

The Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1351
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Prácticas anticompetitivas
pruebas
evidencias
empresarios
El Salvador
contencioso administrativo
Anticompetitive practices
proof
evidence
undertakings
administrative jurisdiction
id REVUNJBG_82bf706937350ecbdd0fcfef2f1fee60
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1351
network_acronym_str REVUNJBG
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
Prueba utilizada en investigaciones de prácticas anticompetitivas en El Salvador: criterios de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativa 2006-2019
title Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
spellingShingle Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam
Prácticas anticompetitivas
pruebas
evidencias
empresarios
El Salvador
contencioso administrativo
Anticompetitive practices
proof
evidence
undertakings
El Salvador
administrative jurisdiction
title_short Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
title_full Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
title_fullStr Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
title_full_unstemmed Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
title_sort Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam
author Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam
author_facet Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Prácticas anticompetitivas
pruebas
evidencias
empresarios
El Salvador
contencioso administrativo
Anticompetitive practices
proof
evidence
undertakings
El Salvador
administrative jurisdiction
topic Prácticas anticompetitivas
pruebas
evidencias
empresarios
El Salvador
contencioso administrativo
Anticompetitive practices
proof
evidence
undertakings
El Salvador
administrative jurisdiction
description The Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges related to the lack of forcefulness to justify the sanctions imposed, in the opinion of the affected companies. Many sanctions imposed by the Board of Directors of the Superintendency of Competition have been challenged in Contentious-Administrative proceedings, as it was the only jurisdiction before which appeals could be made during the period covered by this investigation. The methodology used in this article consisted of the analysis of all the resolutions in cases of cartels sanctioned by the competition authority, to extract the evidence that has allowed convicting; and in a second place, to examine the rulings of the Contentious Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador to determine if they have confirmed the legality of the decisions of the competition authority or if they have established their illegality. The most relevant finding of this study, which can help economic operators to guide their actions within the framework of the Competition Law, is that the legality of all sanctions imposed in cartel cases has been confirmed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351
10.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351
url https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351
identifier_str_mv 10.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1508
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1600
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1659
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1543
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1542
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economía & Negocios; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2022): Economía & Negocios: Abril - Septiembre; 63-76
2708-6062
10.33326/27086062.2022.1
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
instname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
instacron:UNJBG
instname_str Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
instacron_str UNJBG
institution UNJBG
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846429889381531648
spelling Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019Prueba utilizada en investigaciones de prácticas anticompetitivas en El Salvador: criterios de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativa 2006-2019Arrieta de Carsana, LilliamPrácticas anticompetitivaspruebasevidenciasempresariosEl Salvadorcontencioso administrativoAnticompetitive practicesproofevidenceundertakingsEl Salvadoradministrative jurisdictionThe Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges related to the lack of forcefulness to justify the sanctions imposed, in the opinion of the affected companies. Many sanctions imposed by the Board of Directors of the Superintendency of Competition have been challenged in Contentious-Administrative proceedings, as it was the only jurisdiction before which appeals could be made during the period covered by this investigation. The methodology used in this article consisted of the analysis of all the resolutions in cases of cartels sanctioned by the competition authority, to extract the evidence that has allowed convicting; and in a second place, to examine the rulings of the Contentious Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador to determine if they have confirmed the legality of the decisions of the competition authority or if they have established their illegality. The most relevant finding of this study, which can help economic operators to guide their actions within the framework of the Competition Law, is that the legality of all sanctions imposed in cartel cases has been confirmed.La Ley de Competencia de El Salvador del 2006, prohíbe los carteles entre empresarios u operadores económicos, pero como se trata de acuerdos ilegales, realizados generalmente sin dejar un rastro probatorio material, existe dificultad para probar su realización. Esto ha generado múltiples impugnaciones relacionadas con la falta de contundencia para justificar las sanciones impuestas, en la opinión de las empresas afectadas. Muchas sanciones impuestas por el Consejo Directivo de la Superintendencia de Competencia han sido impugnadas en sede Contencioso Administrativa, por ser la única jurisdicción ante la cual se podía recurrir durante el periodo cubierto por esta investigación. La metodología empleada en el presente artículo, consistió en el análisis de la totalidad de las resoluciones en casos de carteles sancionados por la autoridad de competencia, para extraer los elementos probatorios que han permitido condenar; y en un segundo lugar, examinar los pronunciamientos de la Sala de lo Contencioso de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de El Salvador para determinar si han confirmado la legalidad de las decisiones de la autoridad de competencia o si han establecido su ilegalidad. El hallazgo más relevante de este estudio y que puede servir para que los operadores económicos orienten sus actuaciones en el marco de la Ley de Competencia, es que la legalidad de todas las sanciones impuestas en casos de carteles ha sido confirmada.Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann2022-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/135110.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351Economía & Negocios; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2022): Economía & Negocios: Abril - Septiembre; 63-762708-606210.33326/27086062.2022.1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstacron:UNJBGspahttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1508https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1600https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1659https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1543https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1542Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsanahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/13512023-03-05T14:29:14Z
score 13.413352
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).