Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019
Descripción del Articulo
The Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges rel...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1351 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Prácticas anticompetitivas pruebas evidencias empresarios El Salvador contencioso administrativo Anticompetitive practices proof evidence undertakings administrative jurisdiction |
| id |
REVUNJBG_82bf706937350ecbdd0fcfef2f1fee60 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1351 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNJBG |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 Prueba utilizada en investigaciones de prácticas anticompetitivas en El Salvador: criterios de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativa 2006-2019 |
| title |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| spellingShingle |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam Prácticas anticompetitivas pruebas evidencias empresarios El Salvador contencioso administrativo Anticompetitive practices proof evidence undertakings El Salvador administrative jurisdiction |
| title_short |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| title_full |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| title_fullStr |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| title_sort |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019 |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam |
| author |
Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam |
| author_facet |
Arrieta de Carsana, Lilliam |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Prácticas anticompetitivas pruebas evidencias empresarios El Salvador contencioso administrativo Anticompetitive practices proof evidence undertakings El Salvador administrative jurisdiction |
| topic |
Prácticas anticompetitivas pruebas evidencias empresarios El Salvador contencioso administrativo Anticompetitive practices proof evidence undertakings El Salvador administrative jurisdiction |
| description |
The Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges related to the lack of forcefulness to justify the sanctions imposed, in the opinion of the affected companies. Many sanctions imposed by the Board of Directors of the Superintendency of Competition have been challenged in Contentious-Administrative proceedings, as it was the only jurisdiction before which appeals could be made during the period covered by this investigation. The methodology used in this article consisted of the analysis of all the resolutions in cases of cartels sanctioned by the competition authority, to extract the evidence that has allowed convicting; and in a second place, to examine the rulings of the Contentious Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador to determine if they have confirmed the legality of the decisions of the competition authority or if they have established their illegality. The most relevant finding of this study, which can help economic operators to guide their actions within the framework of the Competition Law, is that the legality of all sanctions imposed in cartel cases has been confirmed. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-18 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351 10.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351 |
| url |
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1508 https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1600 https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1659 https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1543 https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1542 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economía & Negocios; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2022): Economía & Negocios: Abril - Septiembre; 63-76 2708-6062 10.33326/27086062.2022.1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann instname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann instacron:UNJBG |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| instacron_str |
UNJBG |
| institution |
UNJBG |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846429889381531648 |
| spelling |
Types of evidence used in anti-cartel investigations in El Salvador: standards established by the Administrative Review Chamber 2006-2019Prueba utilizada en investigaciones de prácticas anticompetitivas en El Salvador: criterios de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativa 2006-2019Arrieta de Carsana, LilliamPrácticas anticompetitivaspruebasevidenciasempresariosEl Salvadorcontencioso administrativoAnticompetitive practicesproofevidenceundertakingsEl Salvadoradministrative jurisdictionThe Competition Law of El Salvador of 2006 prohibits cartels between businessmen or economic operators, but since they are illegal agreements, generally carried out without leaving a material evidence trail, there is difficulty in proving their realization. This has generated multiple challenges related to the lack of forcefulness to justify the sanctions imposed, in the opinion of the affected companies. Many sanctions imposed by the Board of Directors of the Superintendency of Competition have been challenged in Contentious-Administrative proceedings, as it was the only jurisdiction before which appeals could be made during the period covered by this investigation. The methodology used in this article consisted of the analysis of all the resolutions in cases of cartels sanctioned by the competition authority, to extract the evidence that has allowed convicting; and in a second place, to examine the rulings of the Contentious Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador to determine if they have confirmed the legality of the decisions of the competition authority or if they have established their illegality. The most relevant finding of this study, which can help economic operators to guide their actions within the framework of the Competition Law, is that the legality of all sanctions imposed in cartel cases has been confirmed.La Ley de Competencia de El Salvador del 2006, prohíbe los carteles entre empresarios u operadores económicos, pero como se trata de acuerdos ilegales, realizados generalmente sin dejar un rastro probatorio material, existe dificultad para probar su realización. Esto ha generado múltiples impugnaciones relacionadas con la falta de contundencia para justificar las sanciones impuestas, en la opinión de las empresas afectadas. Muchas sanciones impuestas por el Consejo Directivo de la Superintendencia de Competencia han sido impugnadas en sede Contencioso Administrativa, por ser la única jurisdicción ante la cual se podía recurrir durante el periodo cubierto por esta investigación. La metodología empleada en el presente artículo, consistió en el análisis de la totalidad de las resoluciones en casos de carteles sancionados por la autoridad de competencia, para extraer los elementos probatorios que han permitido condenar; y en un segundo lugar, examinar los pronunciamientos de la Sala de lo Contencioso de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de El Salvador para determinar si han confirmado la legalidad de las decisiones de la autoridad de competencia o si han establecido su ilegalidad. El hallazgo más relevante de este estudio y que puede servir para que los operadores económicos orienten sus actuaciones en el marco de la Ley de Competencia, es que la legalidad de todas las sanciones impuestas en casos de carteles ha sido confirmada.Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann2022-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/135110.33326/27086062.2022.1.1351Economía & Negocios; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2022): Economía & Negocios: Abril - Septiembre; 63-762708-606210.33326/27086062.2022.1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstacron:UNJBGspahttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1508https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1600https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1659https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1543https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/eyn/article/view/1351/1542Derechos de autor 2022 Lilliam Arrieta de Carsanahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/13512023-03-05T14:29:14Z |
| score |
13.413352 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).