Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
Descripción del Articulo
The objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3293 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | quinoa accessions nutritional functional growing zone quinua accesiones nutricional funcional zona de cultivo |
id |
REVUNITRU_fee7d5d0414138be92b55f922ad2d362 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3293 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNITRU |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of PeruEvaluación nutricional y funcional de 17 accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivadas en la zona andina del PerúPonce de León Saavedra, PámelaValdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmenquinoaaccessionsnutritionalfunctionalgrowing zonequinuaaccesionesnutricionalfuncionalzona de cultivoThe objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 9.79% ± 0.01, 17.27% ± 0.02, 6.76% ± 0.01, 2.10% ± 0.05, 3.07% ± 0.04 y 70.81% ± 0.11 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starches and protein was 32.23% ± 0.008 and 83.6% ± 0.002 respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.44% ± 1.86. In Cuzco accessions, the average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 11.29% ± 0.02, 16.46% ± 0.04, 7.67% ± 0.01, 1,97% ± 0.01, 2.52% ± 0.01 and 71.38% ± 0.04 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starch and proteins was 72.52% ± 0.001 and 83.53% ± 0.007, respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.02% ± 1.57. Among the quinoa accessions of Huancayo and their corresponding originals from Cuzco, content of protein, crude fiber, carbohydrates, total dietary fiber, total phenolic compounds, and in vitro digestibility of protein did not show significant differences (p ˃ 0.05).El objetivo fue evaluar la composición nutricional y el potencial funcional en accesiones de quinua provenientes de la sierra del Cuzco y sembradas en Huancayo. Se evaluaron 17 accesiones provenientes de Huancayo, 7 de bajo contenido de saponinas (< 0,11) y 10 de contenido alto. El resultado promedio de humedad, proteínas, grasa, cenizas, fibra bruta y carbohidratos fue 9,79% ± 0,01, 17,27% ± 0,02 6,76% ± 0,01, 2,10% ± 0,05, 3,07% ± 0,04 y 70,81% ± 0,11 respectivamente. La digestibilidad in vitro de almidones y proteína fue 32,23% ± 0,008 y 83,6% ± 0,002 respectivamente. La fibra dietaria total fue 7,44% ± 1,86. En las accesiones de quinua del Cuzco, los resultados de humedad, proteínas, grasa, ceniza, fibra bruta y carbohidratos fueron 11,29% ± 0,02, 16,46% ± 0,04, 7,67% ± 0,01, 1,97% ± 0,01, 2,52% ± 0,01 y 71,38% ± 0,04 respectivamente. La digestibilidad in vitro de almidón y proteínas fue 72,52% ± 0,001 y 83,53% ± 0,007 respectivamente. La fibra dietaria total fue 7,02% ± 1,57. Entre las accesiones de quinua de Huancayo y sus correspondientes originales del Cuzco, el contenido de proteínas, fibra cruda, carbohidratos y fibra dietaria total, compuestos fenólicos y digestibilidad in vitro de proteínas no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p ˃ 0,05).Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-232306-67412077-9917reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUspahttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/6704https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/4007Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Aranahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/32932021-07-20T17:11:42Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru Evaluación nutricional y funcional de 17 accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivadas en la zona andina del Perú |
title |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
spellingShingle |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela quinoa accessions nutritional functional growing zone quinua accesiones nutricional funcional zona de cultivo |
title_short |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
title_full |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
title_fullStr |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
title_sort |
Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen |
author |
Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela |
author_facet |
Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
quinoa accessions nutritional functional growing zone quinua accesiones nutricional funcional zona de cultivo |
topic |
quinoa accessions nutritional functional growing zone quinua accesiones nutricional funcional zona de cultivo |
description |
The objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 9.79% ± 0.01, 17.27% ± 0.02, 6.76% ± 0.01, 2.10% ± 0.05, 3.07% ± 0.04 y 70.81% ± 0.11 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starches and protein was 32.23% ± 0.008 and 83.6% ± 0.002 respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.44% ± 1.86. In Cuzco accessions, the average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 11.29% ± 0.02, 16.46% ± 0.04, 7.67% ± 0.01, 1,97% ± 0.01, 2.52% ± 0.01 and 71.38% ± 0.04 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starch and proteins was 72.52% ± 0.001 and 83.53% ± 0.007, respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.02% ± 1.57. Among the quinoa accessions of Huancayo and their corresponding originals from Cuzco, content of protein, crude fiber, carbohydrates, total dietary fiber, total phenolic compounds, and in vitro digestibility of protein did not show significant differences (p ˃ 0.05). |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293 |
url |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/6704 https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/4007 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Arana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Arana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23 Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23 2306-6741 2077-9917 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo instacron:UNITRU |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
instacron_str |
UNITRU |
institution |
UNITRU |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1844618536934178816 |
score |
13.408957 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).