Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru

Descripción del Articulo

The objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela, Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3293
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:quinoa
accessions
nutritional
functional
growing zone
quinua
accesiones
nutricional
funcional
zona de cultivo
id REVUNITRU_fee7d5d0414138be92b55f922ad2d362
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3293
network_acronym_str REVUNITRU
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
repository_id_str
spelling Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of PeruEvaluación nutricional y funcional de 17 accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivadas en la zona andina del PerúPonce de León Saavedra, PámelaValdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmenquinoaaccessionsnutritionalfunctionalgrowing zonequinuaaccesionesnutricionalfuncionalzona de cultivoThe objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 9.79% ± 0.01, 17.27% ± 0.02, 6.76% ± 0.01, 2.10% ± 0.05, 3.07% ± 0.04 y 70.81% ± 0.11 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starches and protein was 32.23% ± 0.008 and 83.6% ± 0.002 respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.44% ± 1.86. In Cuzco accessions, the average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 11.29% ± 0.02, 16.46% ± 0.04, 7.67% ± 0.01, 1,97% ± 0.01, 2.52% ± 0.01 and 71.38% ± 0.04 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starch and proteins was 72.52% ± 0.001 and 83.53% ± 0.007, respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.02% ± 1.57. Among the quinoa accessions of Huancayo and their corresponding originals from Cuzco, content of protein, crude fiber, carbohydrates, total dietary fiber, total phenolic compounds, and in vitro digestibility of protein did not show significant differences (p ˃ 0.05).El objetivo fue evaluar la composición nutricional y el potencial funcional en accesiones de quinua provenientes de la sierra del Cuzco y sembradas en Huancayo. Se evaluaron 17 accesiones provenientes de Huancayo, 7 de bajo contenido de saponinas (< 0,11) y 10 de contenido alto. El resultado promedio de humedad, proteínas, grasa, cenizas, fibra bruta y carbohidratos fue 9,79% ± 0,01, 17,27% ± 0,02 6,76% ± 0,01, 2,10% ± 0,05, 3,07% ± 0,04 y 70,81% ± 0,11 respectivamente. La digestibilidad in vitro de almidones y proteína fue 32,23% ± 0,008 y 83,6% ± 0,002 respectivamente. La fibra dietaria total fue 7,44% ± 1,86. En las accesiones de quinua del Cuzco, los resultados de humedad, proteínas, grasa, ceniza, fibra bruta y carbohidratos fueron 11,29% ± 0,02, 16,46% ± 0,04, 7,67% ± 0,01, 1,97% ± 0,01, 2,52% ± 0,01 y 71,38% ± 0,04 respectivamente. La digestibilidad in vitro de almidón y proteínas fue 72,52% ± 0,001 y 83,53% ± 0,007 respectivamente. La fibra dietaria total fue 7,02% ± 1,57. Entre las accesiones de quinua de Huancayo y sus correspondientes originales del Cuzco, el contenido de proteínas, fibra cruda, carbohidratos y fibra dietaria total, compuestos fenólicos y digestibilidad in vitro de proteínas no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p ˃ 0,05).Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-232306-67412077-9917reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUspahttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/6704https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/4007Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Aranahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/32932021-07-20T17:11:42Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
Evaluación nutricional y funcional de 17 accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivadas en la zona andina del Perú
title Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
spellingShingle Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela
quinoa
accessions
nutritional
functional
growing zone
quinua
accesiones
nutricional
funcional
zona de cultivo
title_short Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
title_full Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
title_fullStr Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
title_sort Nutritional and functional evaluation of 17 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) accessions cultivated in the Andean area of Peru
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela
Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen
author Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela
author_facet Ponce de León Saavedra, Pámela
Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen
author_role author
author2 Valdez-Arana, Jenny del Carmen
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv quinoa
accessions
nutritional
functional
growing zone
quinua
accesiones
nutricional
funcional
zona de cultivo
topic quinoa
accessions
nutritional
functional
growing zone
quinua
accesiones
nutricional
funcional
zona de cultivo
description The objective was to evaluate the nutritional composition and functional potential of quinoa accessions from Cuzco and cultivated in Huancayo. Were evaluated 17 accessions of Huancayo, 7 of low saponin content (< 0.11) and 10 of high. The average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 9.79% ± 0.01, 17.27% ± 0.02, 6.76% ± 0.01, 2.10% ± 0.05, 3.07% ± 0.04 y 70.81% ± 0.11 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starches and protein was 32.23% ± 0.008 and 83.6% ± 0.002 respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.44% ± 1.86. In Cuzco accessions, the average results of moisture, protein, fat, ash, crude fiber and carbohydrates were 11.29% ± 0.02, 16.46% ± 0.04, 7.67% ± 0.01, 1,97% ± 0.01, 2.52% ± 0.01 and 71.38% ± 0.04 respectively. The in vitro digestibility of starch and proteins was 72.52% ± 0.001 and 83.53% ± 0.007, respectively. The total dietary fiber was 7.02% ± 1.57. Among the quinoa accessions of Huancayo and their corresponding originals from Cuzco, content of protein, crude fiber, carbohydrates, total dietary fiber, total phenolic compounds, and in vitro digestibility of protein did not show significant differences (p ˃ 0.05).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293
url https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/6704
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3293/4007
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Arana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Pámela Ponce de León Saavedra, Jenny del Carmen Valdez-Arana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero - Marzo; 15-23
2306-6741
2077-9917
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron:UNITRU
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron_str UNITRU
institution UNITRU
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844618536934178816
score 13.408957
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).