Resistencia de Eschericha coli productora de Betalactamasas en infección urinaria de una clínica de Lima: Resistance of Beta-lactamase-producing Eschericha coli in urinary infection in a clinic in Lima
Descripción del Articulo
        Objetive: To determine the prevalence of E. coli among positive urine cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility according to their ESBL+. Methods: An observational, descriptive, and retrospective case series study was carried out evaluating medical records of patients with urinary tract infections h...
              
            
    
                        | Autores: | , , , | 
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo | 
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 | 
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional de Trujillo | 
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo | 
| Lenguaje: | español | 
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/5589 | 
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/RMT/article/view/5589 | 
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto | 
| Materia: | Infection urinary tract resistance Escherichia coli antibiogram Infección tracto urinario resistencia, E. coli antibiograma | 
| Sumario: | Objetive: To determine the prevalence of E. coli among positive urine cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility according to their ESBL+. Methods: An observational, descriptive, and retrospective case series study was carried out evaluating medical records of patients with urinary tract infections hospitalized in a prestigious clinic in Lima between 2019 and 2021. Positive urine cultures and their antibiograms were analyzed. Results: The highest prevalence corresponded to Escherichia coli with 65% and, particularly 15%, that of Escherichia coli ESBL+, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae ssp (14.77%), Staphylococcuss saprophyticus (5.68%), Proteus mirabilis (3.41%), Enterococcus sp. (2.27%), among others. According to the antibiograms, there was a higher prevalence of resistance for E. coli ESBL to the following antibiotics: Amoxicillin- clavulanic acid (100%), ampicillin (100%), cephalotin (100%), cefazolin (100%), cefepime (100%), cefotaxime (100%), ceftazidime (100%), ceftriaxone (100%), cefuroxime (100%), ciprofloxacin (92.31%), among others. On the other hand, E. coli ESBL+ had greater sensitivity to fosfomycin (100%), imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%), nitrofurantoin (92.31%). Conclusion: that the highest prevalence of urinary tract infection was by E.coli non-ESBL, which were highly sensitive to cephalosporins and quinolones, while for E.coli ESBL +, they were totally sensitive  to fosfomycin, imipenem and meropenem. | 
|---|
 Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
    La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
 
   
   
             
            