Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University

Descripción del Articulo

The present research had as objective to identify, through evaluation, scientific rigor level ofthe masters’ theses in education of a public university. We used the documentary analysistechnique; an instrument was made to evaluate the master´s thesis and was validated by theexperts judgment techniqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Chambi Mescco, Edith
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/991
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/991
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Scientific Rigor Level, Thesis of Master, Educational research.
Nivel de rigor científico, tesis de maestría, investigación educativa.
id REVUNIFE_2047d7c4a1e8fd7246ba60894d9bb8a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/991
network_acronym_str REVUNIFE
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public UniversityNivel de rigor científico de las tesis de Maestría en Educación, el caso de una Universidad PúblicaChambi Mescco, EdithScientific Rigor Level, Thesis of Master, Educational research.Nivel de rigor científico, tesis de maestría, investigación educativa.The present research had as objective to identify, through evaluation, scientific rigor level ofthe masters’ theses in education of a public university. We used the documentary analysistechnique; an instrument was made to evaluate the master´s thesis and was validated by theexperts judgment technique. The population was made of a total of 126 master’s thesespublished between the years 2012 and 2014, and of a quantitative type, a sample of 72master’s theses were taken for analysis applying stratified sampling per year publicationand were selected randomly. We evaluated each of the theses that were obtained from theEducation Faculty Library. We evaluated each of the theses that were retrieved from theEducation Faculty Library and we identified to what level they belonged on a scale of five:high, very high, medium, low and very low. After the descriptive statistical analysis, we candetermine that most of the theses correspond to the average level of Scientific Rigor.La presente investigación tuvo como objetivo identificar el nivel de rigor científico de lastesis de maestría en educación de una universidad pública mediante la evaluación. Se usóla técnica de análisis documental, por ello se elaboró un instrumento para evaluar las tesisde maestría y se validó mediante la técnica de juicio de expertos. La población estuvoconformada por un total de 126 tesis de maestría publicadas entre los años 2012 y 2014 yde tipo cuantitativas, se tomó una muestra de 72 tesis de maestría aplicando un muestreoestratificado por año de publicación y fueron seleccionadas de forma aleatoria. Se evaluócada una de las tesis que se obtuvieron de la biblioteca de la Facultad de Educación y seidentificó a qué nivel corresponde cada una, en una escala de cinco: muy alto, alto, medio,bajo y muy bajo. Después del análisis estadístico descriptivo se pudo identificar que lamayor parte de las tesis corresponden al nivel medio de rigor científico.Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón (UNIFÉ)2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/99110.33539/consensus.v22n1.991Consensus; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2017): Consensus; 37-47Consensus; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2017): Consensus; 37-471680-3817reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstacron:UNIFEspahttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/991/903Derechos de autor 2017 Edith Chambi Mesccoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/9912022-05-05T01:54:43Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
Nivel de rigor científico de las tesis de Maestría en Educación, el caso de una Universidad Pública
title Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
spellingShingle Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
Chambi Mescco, Edith
Scientific Rigor Level, Thesis of Master, Educational research.
Nivel de rigor científico, tesis de maestría, investigación educativa.
title_short Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
title_full Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
title_fullStr Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
title_sort Scientific Rigor Level of Master’s Thesis in Education - Case Study: Public University
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chambi Mescco, Edith
author Chambi Mescco, Edith
author_facet Chambi Mescco, Edith
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Rigor Level, Thesis of Master, Educational research.
Nivel de rigor científico, tesis de maestría, investigación educativa.
topic Scientific Rigor Level, Thesis of Master, Educational research.
Nivel de rigor científico, tesis de maestría, investigación educativa.
description The present research had as objective to identify, through evaluation, scientific rigor level ofthe masters’ theses in education of a public university. We used the documentary analysistechnique; an instrument was made to evaluate the master´s thesis and was validated by theexperts judgment technique. The population was made of a total of 126 master’s thesespublished between the years 2012 and 2014, and of a quantitative type, a sample of 72master’s theses were taken for analysis applying stratified sampling per year publicationand were selected randomly. We evaluated each of the theses that were obtained from theEducation Faculty Library. We evaluated each of the theses that were retrieved from theEducation Faculty Library and we identified to what level they belonged on a scale of five:high, very high, medium, low and very low. After the descriptive statistical analysis, we candetermine that most of the theses correspond to the average level of Scientific Rigor.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/991
10.33539/consensus.v22n1.991
url https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/991
identifier_str_mv 10.33539/consensus.v22n1.991
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/consensus/article/view/991/903
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Edith Chambi Mescco
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Edith Chambi Mescco
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón (UNIFÉ)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón (UNIFÉ)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Consensus; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2017): Consensus; 37-47
Consensus; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2017): Consensus; 37-47
1680-3817
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instacron:UNIFE
instname_str Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instacron_str UNIFE
institution UNIFE
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
collection Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844437411302473728
score 13.4163885
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).