Protecting a transgender person’s right to gender identity in the peruvian legal system: from a Dialogical perspective between Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law: advances, setbacks, and challenges (2014-2018): avances, retrocesos y desafíos (2014-2018)

Descripción del Articulo

In 2014, through Ruling No. 00139-2013-PA/TC, the Constitutional Court (hereinafter, Court) established a constitutional precedent whereby gender is animmutable element and, consequently, it is not possible to request any amendment of data in identity documents. In addition, the Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rodríguez Campos, Rafael
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1256
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/personayfamilia/article/view/1256
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Derecho a la identidad de género, persona trans, Tribunal Constitucional
Transgender person´s right, gender identity, Constitutional Court of Peru
Descripción
Sumario:In 2014, through Ruling No. 00139-2013-PA/TC, the Constitutional Court (hereinafter, Court) established a constitutional precedent whereby gender is animmutable element and, consequently, it is not possible to request any amendment of data in identity documents. In addition, the Court based its reasoning on the idea that any alteration of identity following that criterion should be construed as a “disorder and/or pathology”. In other words, for this Court (Urviola Hani, Vergara Gotelli, Calle Hayen and Alvarez Miranda, judges who voted in the majority), transsexual persons were “disturbed or sick”. However, in a landmark decision for transgender persons in Peru, the current Court  (Miranda Canales, Ledesma Narváez, Ramos Nuñez and Espinosa-Saldaña Barrera,judges who voted in the majority) issued Ruling No. 06040-2015-PA/TC, by which it strayed away from the constitutional precedent it had set in the previous judgment, guaranteeing the right of access to justice to transgender persons who wish to request the their personal data be updated in their identity documents. In other words, with this decision, the Court recognizes the competence of judges to protect the right to identity and legal personality of transgender persons, as it considers that “there is no longer any impediment, whether legal or jurisprudential, to protecting these rights”. 
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).