Estilos de aprendizaje en estudiantes del primer y quinto grado de secundaria

Descripción del Articulo

The objective of the research was to identify the predominant learning styles in first and fifth grade high school students of the State Educational Institution in Acobamba, Huancavelica. The method used was a descriptive approach to describe and identify the variable, with a basic and pure purpose,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Duran Huayllani, Daniel Antonio, Camposano Córdova, Alvaro Ignacio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Huancavelica
Repositorio:Quintaesencia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.unh.edu.pe:article/673
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unh.edu.pe/index.php/quintaesencia/article/view/673
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Estilos de aprendizaje
estrategias de aprendizaje
enseñanza efectiva
Learning styles
learning strategies
effective teaching
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of the research was to identify the predominant learning styles in first and fifth grade high school students of the State Educational Institution in Acobamba, Huancavelica. The method used was a descriptive approach to describe and identify the variable, with a basic and pure purpose, collecting information from reality to enrich the scientific theoretical knowledge. The research was of the primary type, using first-hand data. The design was non-experimental, cross-sectional and descriptive, with a sample of 100 students. A survey was conducted through a Honey-Alonso questionnaire (CHAEA), with reliabilities of 0.6272 for the active style, 0.7275 for the reflective style, 0.6584 for the theoretical style and 0.5854 for the pragmatic style. The results in the pretest, the theoretical learning style predominated with 49%, followed by the pragmatic (23%), active (16%) and reflective (12%) styles. The theoretical style was the most used in both first and fifth grade of secondary school. In terms of gender, both genders predominantly used the theoretical style. According to age, students aged 11 years showed a predominance of the pragmatic and theoretical style, while those aged 12 to 17 years had a predominance of the theoretical style, and those aged 18 years presented active and pragmatic styles. Upon entering the institution, students showed theoretical and pragmatic styles, maintaining these styles upon graduation.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).