Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana
Descripción del Articulo
In Ghana, most smallholder maize farmers delay harvesting of their crops in an attempt to achieve optimum moisture content levels necessary for safe storage. Late harvesting may cause a hike in insect attacks and fungal contaminations, leading to alterations in nutrient composition of grains. This...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/2003 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/2003 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | aflatoxins harvest time maize nutrient composition aflatoxina tiempo de cosecha maíz composición de nutrientes |
| id |
REVUNALM_f888592a518c915cfd7f260430d6d536 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/2003 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNALM |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana Efectos del tiempo de cosecha sobre la calidad del maíz almacenado (Zea mays L.) en la parte sur de Ghana |
| title |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| spellingShingle |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana Asare, Sharon Gyekyewaa aflatoxins harvest time maize nutrient composition aflatoxina tiempo de cosecha maíz composición de nutrientes |
| title_short |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| title_full |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| title_fullStr |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| title_sort |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of Ghana |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Asare, Sharon Gyekyewaa Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra Sekyere Owusu, Bismark Kweku Baidoo, Philip Asare, Sharon Gyekyewaa Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra Sekyere Owusu, Bismark Kweku Baidoo, Philip |
| author |
Asare, Sharon Gyekyewaa |
| author_facet |
Asare, Sharon Gyekyewaa Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra Sekyere Owusu, Bismark Kweku Baidoo, Philip Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra Sekyere Owusu, Bismark Kweku Baidoo, Philip Abankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
aflatoxins harvest time maize nutrient composition aflatoxina tiempo de cosecha maíz composición de nutrientes |
| topic |
aflatoxins harvest time maize nutrient composition aflatoxina tiempo de cosecha maíz composición de nutrientes |
| description |
In Ghana, most smallholder maize farmers delay harvesting of their crops in an attempt to achieve optimum moisture content levels necessary for safe storage. Late harvesting may cause a hike in insect attacks and fungal contaminations, leading to alterations in nutrient composition of grains. This study examined the effects of harvest time and storage form on quality of maize. Maize was grown and harvested from 36 plots, with each plot measuring 3m x 3m. Planting of maize was done during the major and minor seasons (April – August, 2020 and September – December, 2020) respectively. Moisture content of maize before storage was determined as 12.50 % to 12.85 % (major season) and 11.90 % to 12.48% (minor season). Harvesting was done at three stages (E = Early harvest, M = Mid harvest and L = Late harvest) and maize was stored for 90 days in three different ways (D = Dehusked, H = Husked and S = Shelled). Data was subjected to Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Sisvar version 5.6. Mid harvest dehusked maize had the highest final starch content (69.28 %) while Early harvest husked maize had the highest protein content (7.22 %). Ash content of maize from the various treatments ranged from 3.50% to 5.39 % (initial) and 3.03 % to 4.13 % (final), the difference was significant (p<0.05). Late harvest husked maize (LHH) recorded 35 % more initial ash as compared to EHS. Aflatoxin level was highest on Late harvest dehusked maize (60.70 ppb). Nutrient and aflatoxin levels of maize were significantly affected by harvest time. Encouraging farmers to adopt a better approach to harvesting, drying and storage of maize can reduce crop losses and ensure food security. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/2003 10.21704/pja.v7i2.2003 |
| url |
https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/2003 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.21704/pja.v7i2.2003 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/2003/2860 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): May to August; 144-155 Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2023): May to August; 144-155 2616-4477 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina instname:Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina instacron:UNALM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| instacron_str |
UNALM |
| institution |
UNALM |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1847063431956398080 |
| spelling |
Effects of Harvest Time on Quality of Stored Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Southern Part of GhanaEfectos del tiempo de cosecha sobre la calidad del maíz almacenado (Zea mays L.) en la parte sur de GhanaAsare, Sharon GyekyewaaAbankwa-Kwarteng, SandraSekyere Owusu, BismarkKweku Baidoo, Philip Asare, Sharon GyekyewaaAbankwa-Kwarteng, Sandra Sekyere Owusu, BismarkKweku Baidoo, Philip aflatoxinsharvest timemaizenutrient compositionaflatoxinatiempo de cosechamaízcomposición de nutrientes In Ghana, most smallholder maize farmers delay harvesting of their crops in an attempt to achieve optimum moisture content levels necessary for safe storage. Late harvesting may cause a hike in insect attacks and fungal contaminations, leading to alterations in nutrient composition of grains. This study examined the effects of harvest time and storage form on quality of maize. Maize was grown and harvested from 36 plots, with each plot measuring 3m x 3m. Planting of maize was done during the major and minor seasons (April – August, 2020 and September – December, 2020) respectively. Moisture content of maize before storage was determined as 12.50 % to 12.85 % (major season) and 11.90 % to 12.48% (minor season). Harvesting was done at three stages (E = Early harvest, M = Mid harvest and L = Late harvest) and maize was stored for 90 days in three different ways (D = Dehusked, H = Husked and S = Shelled). Data was subjected to Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Sisvar version 5.6. Mid harvest dehusked maize had the highest final starch content (69.28 %) while Early harvest husked maize had the highest protein content (7.22 %). Ash content of maize from the various treatments ranged from 3.50% to 5.39 % (initial) and 3.03 % to 4.13 % (final), the difference was significant (p<0.05). Late harvest husked maize (LHH) recorded 35 % more initial ash as compared to EHS. Aflatoxin level was highest on Late harvest dehusked maize (60.70 ppb). Nutrient and aflatoxin levels of maize were significantly affected by harvest time. Encouraging farmers to adopt a better approach to harvesting, drying and storage of maize can reduce crop losses and ensure food security. En Ghana, la mayoría de los pequeños productores de maíz retrasan la cosecha de sus cultivos en un intento por alcanzar los niveles óptimos de contenido de humedad necesarios para un almacenamiento seguro. La cosecha tardía puede causar un aumento en los ataques de insectos y contaminaciones por hongos, lo que lleva a alteraciones en la composición de nutrientes de los granos. Este estudio examinó los efectos del tiempo de cosecha y la forma de almacenamiento sobre la calidad del maíz. El maíz se cultivó y cosechó en 36 parcelas, cada una de las cuales medía 3 m x 3 m. La siembra de maíz se realizó durante las temporadas mayor y menor (abril – agosto de 2020 y septiembre – diciembre de 2020) respectivamente. El contenido de humedad del maíz antes del almacenamiento se determinó entre 12.50 % y 12.85 % (temporada mayor) y 11.90 % y 12.48 % (temporada menor). La cosecha se realizó en tres etapas (E = Cosecha Temprana, M = Cosecha Media y L = Cosecha Tardía) y el maíz se almacenó durante 90 días de tres formas diferentes; D = Mazorca con vainas, H = Mazorca sin vainas y S = Desgranado. Los datos se sometieron a Análisis de varianza (ANOVA) utilizando Sisvar versión 5.6. El maíz descascarillado de cosecha media tuvo el mayor contenido final de almidón (69.28 %), mientras que el maíz descascarillado de cosecha temprana tuvo el mayor contenido de proteína (7.22 %). El contenido de cenizas del maíz de los distintos tratamientos osciló entre 3.50 % y 5.39 % (inicial) y 3.03 % y 4.13 % (final), las diferencias fueron significativas (p <0.05). El maíz descascarillado de cosecha tardía (LHH) registró un 35 % más de ceniza inicial en comparación con el EHS. El nivel de aflatoxinas fue más alto en el maíz descascarillado de cosecha tardía (60.70 ppb). Los niveles de nutrientes y aflatoxinas del maíz se vieron afectados significativamente por el tiempo de cosecha. Alentar a los agricultores a adoptar un mejor enfoque para la cosecha, el secado y el almacenamiento del maíz puede reducir las pérdidas de cultivos y garantizar la seguridad alimentaria.Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina2023-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/200310.21704/pja.v7i2.2003Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): May to August; 144-155Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2023): May to August; 144-1552616-4477reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molinainstname:Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molinainstacron:UNALMenghttps://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/2003/2860Derechos de autor 2023 Sharon Gyekyewaa Asare, Sandra Abankwa -Kwarteng, Bismark Sekyere Owusu, Philip Kweku Baidoohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/20032025-04-23T17:01:53Z |
| score |
12.837637 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).