Indicadores para medir la adquisición de competencias en las primeras experiencias profesionales en ingeniería
Descripción del Articulo
This article examines the extent to which advanced engineering students and recent graduates from the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (Argentina) perceive they have acquired key competencies during their initial professional experiences. To address the limited understanding of whether their ac...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad de Lima |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de Lima |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7975 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/7975 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | job performance professional skills industrial engineers higher education students graduates desempeño laboral competencias profesionales ingenieros industriales enseñanza superior estudiantes |
| Sumario: | This article examines the extent to which advanced engineering students and recent graduates from the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (Argentina) perceive they have acquired key competencies during their initial professional experiences. To address the limited understanding of whether their academic training aligns with labor market expectations, the study employs two indicators—the Competence Adequacy Indicator (IAC) and the Competence Development Indicator (IDC)—to evaluate the relationship between what students learned, what they expected to learn, and what was required in the workplace. Using an exploratory and descriptive approach, the research surveyed 53 individuals through self-administered questionnaires assessing generic, technological, and social competencies. The findings reveal high expectations regarding competency training and varying gaps between perceived acquisition and workplace demands, with notable differences between Industrial Engineering students and the broader engineering cohort. The study concludes that these indicators offer a valuable reference for monitoring the effectiveness of the faculty’s new competency-based curricula. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).