Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this article is to identify learning situations used in collaborative action research (CAR) in a rural school and a state university, based on the analysis of the strengths andchallenges of experience. From a methodological point of view, this is a case study of action research. The exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Villalta Paucar, Marco Antonio, Ortega Bahamonde, Marisol
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/4088
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/4088
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:action research
collaboration
university
school
education
investigación-acción
cooperación
universidad
escuela
educación
id REVULIMA_d9ce36b13c2e4b833f891aa65fdeb84e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/4088
network_acronym_str REVULIMA
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository_id_str
spelling Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed ExperienceInvestigación-acción cooperativa: aprendiendo de una experiencia fallidaVillalta Paucar, Marco Antonio Ortega Bahamonde, Marisolaction researchcollaborationuniversityschooleducationinvestigación-accióncooperaciónuniversidadescuelaeducaciónThe aim of this article is to identify learning situations used in collaborative action research (CAR) in a rural school and a state university, based on the analysis of the strengths andchallenges of experience. From a methodological point of view, this is a case study of action research. The experience is analytically assessed by recognizing the strengths ―reciprocal recognition, appreciation of the other institutional body as a project partner with shared goals, and commitment of the inter-institutional educational actors to the students― and the challenges ―management of each institution’s internal contingencies for inter-institutional coordination, and institutional differences to distinguish intervention problems and goals. Based on the experience, the following learning situations are recognized: clarifying the goals of collaboration with reality criteria over the fair desire to achieve great transformations, and knowing the institutional administrative times and protocols that affect the inter-institutional collaboration.El presente artículo tiene por objetivo identificar aprendizajes de uso de la investigación--acción colaborativa (I-A-C) entre una escuela rural y una universidad estatal, desde el análisis de fortalezas y desafíos de la experiencia. Metodológicamente, se trata de un estudio de caso de investigación-acción. Se relata analíticamente la experiencia, en la que se reconocen fortalezas: el reconocimiento recíproco, el aprecio del otro institucional como colaborador de un proyecto con metas compartidas, el compromiso de los actores educativos interinstitucionales para con los estudiantes. Asimismo, desafíos: la gestión de contingencias internas de cada institución en la coordinación interinstitucional y las diferencias institu-cionales para distinguir problemas y metas de intervención. Desde la experiencia, se distinguen los siguientes aprendizajes: clarificar las metas de la colaboración con criterio de realidad por sobre el justo deseo de las grandes transformaciones, conocer los protocolos y tiempos administrativos institucionales que inciden en la colaboración interinstitucional.Universidad de Lima2019-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/408810.26439/persona2019.n022(1).4088Persona; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2019); 67-80Persona; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2019); 67-80Persona; v. 22 n. 1 (2019); 67-802309-90621560-613910.26439/persona2019.n022(1)reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Limainstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAspahttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/4088/4124https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/40882025-04-04T21:49:20Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
Investigación-acción cooperativa: aprendiendo de una experiencia fallida
title Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
spellingShingle Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
Villalta Paucar, Marco Antonio
action research
collaboration
university
school
education
investigación-acción
cooperación
universidad
escuela
educación
title_short Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
title_full Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
title_fullStr Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
title_sort Collaborative Action Research: Learning from a Failed Experience
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Villalta Paucar, Marco Antonio
Ortega Bahamonde, Marisol
author Villalta Paucar, Marco Antonio
author_facet Villalta Paucar, Marco Antonio
Ortega Bahamonde, Marisol
author_role author
author2 Ortega Bahamonde, Marisol
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv action research
collaboration
university
school
education
investigación-acción
cooperación
universidad
escuela
educación
topic action research
collaboration
university
school
education
investigación-acción
cooperación
universidad
escuela
educación
description The aim of this article is to identify learning situations used in collaborative action research (CAR) in a rural school and a state university, based on the analysis of the strengths andchallenges of experience. From a methodological point of view, this is a case study of action research. The experience is analytically assessed by recognizing the strengths ―reciprocal recognition, appreciation of the other institutional body as a project partner with shared goals, and commitment of the inter-institutional educational actors to the students― and the challenges ―management of each institution’s internal contingencies for inter-institutional coordination, and institutional differences to distinguish intervention problems and goals. Based on the experience, the following learning situations are recognized: clarifying the goals of collaboration with reality criteria over the fair desire to achieve great transformations, and knowing the institutional administrative times and protocols that affect the inter-institutional collaboration.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/4088
10.26439/persona2019.n022(1).4088
url https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/4088
identifier_str_mv 10.26439/persona2019.n022(1).4088
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Persona/article/view/4088/4124
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Persona; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2019); 67-80
Persona; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2019); 67-80
Persona; v. 22 n. 1 (2019); 67-80
2309-9062
1560-6139
10.26439/persona2019.n022(1)
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
collection Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1841719343192211456
score 12.938228
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).