Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit

Descripción del Articulo

The following work focuses on making an analysis on the against votes of the magistrates that dismissed the amparo process presented by Oscar Ugarteche, who pretended the Peruvian National Registry of Identification and Civil Status — RENIEC to register his marriage certificate, which took place in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Shinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/5766
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:same-sex marriage
right to equality and non-discrimination
homoaffective family
amparo process
right to marriage
matrimonio homosexual
derecho a la igualdad y no discriminación
familia homoafectiva
proceso de amparo
derecho a contraer matrimonio
id REVULIMA_1418ce00ff36b203bbca3aa8e2b68799
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/5766
network_acronym_str REVULIMA
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuitAnálisis del Pleno N° 676/2020: improcedencia del matrimonio homosexual de Óscar UgartecheShinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth same-sex marriageright to equality and non-discriminationhomoaffective familyamparo processright to marriagematrimonio homosexualderecho a la igualdad y no discriminaciónfamilia homoafectivaproceso de amparoderecho a contraer matrimonioThe following work focuses on making an analysis on the against votes of the magistrates that dismissed the amparo process presented by Oscar Ugarteche, who pretended the Peruvian National Registry of Identification and Civil Status — RENIEC to register his marriage certificate, which took place in Mexico and was legally performed there, whilst not pretending the Peruvian State to recognize the legality of same-sex marriage.El presente trabajo centra sus objetivos en realizar un análisis sobre los votos en contra de los magistrados que declararon improcedente el proceso de amparo que presentó Oscar Ugarteche, cuya pretensión fue que el Registro Nacional de Identificación y Estado Civil — RENIEC inscriba la partida de su matrimonio celebrado legalmente en México, mas no que el Estado peruano reconozca el matrimonio homosexual.Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/576610.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5766Advocatus; No. 042 (2022); 249 - 259Advocatus; Núm. 042 (2022); 249 - 2592523-62611996-477310.26439/advocatus2022.n042reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Limainstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAspahttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766/5532https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766/5591https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/57662022-03-09T22:27:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
Análisis del Pleno N° 676/2020: improcedencia del matrimonio homosexual de Óscar Ugarteche
title Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
spellingShingle Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
Shinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth
same-sex marriage
right to equality and non-discrimination
homoaffective family
amparo process
right to marriage
matrimonio homosexual
derecho a la igualdad y no discriminación
familia homoafectiva
proceso de amparo
derecho a contraer matrimonio
title_short Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
title_full Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
title_fullStr Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
title_sort Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Shinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth
author Shinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth
author_facet Shinno Pereyra, Vanessa Elizabeth
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv same-sex marriage
right to equality and non-discrimination
homoaffective family
amparo process
right to marriage
matrimonio homosexual
derecho a la igualdad y no discriminación
familia homoafectiva
proceso de amparo
derecho a contraer matrimonio
topic same-sex marriage
right to equality and non-discrimination
homoaffective family
amparo process
right to marriage
matrimonio homosexual
derecho a la igualdad y no discriminación
familia homoafectiva
proceso de amparo
derecho a contraer matrimonio
description The following work focuses on making an analysis on the against votes of the magistrates that dismissed the amparo process presented by Oscar Ugarteche, who pretended the Peruvian National Registry of Identification and Civil Status — RENIEC to register his marriage certificate, which took place in Mexico and was legally performed there, whilst not pretending the Peruvian State to recognize the legality of same-sex marriage.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766
10.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5766
url https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766
identifier_str_mv 10.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5766
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766/5532
https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/5766/5591
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Advocatus; No. 042 (2022); 249 - 259
Advocatus; Núm. 042 (2022); 249 - 259
2523-6261
1996-4773
10.26439/advocatus2022.n042
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
collection Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844893183009357824
score 13.029787
Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares