Impact of disproportionate sanctions on the artisanal and industrial fishing sectors on the economic sustainability of the Organic Law for the Development of Aquaculture and Fisheries in Ecuador
Descripción del Articulo
This study examined the equity of the sanctioning regime of Ecuador's Organic Law for the Development of Aquaculture and Fisheries and its impact on the economic viability of the artisanal sector. Using a qualitative methodology that combined regulatory review (Articles 192-229 of the above-men...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad José Carlos Mariátegui |
| Repositorio: | Revista ciencia y tecnología para el desarrollo UJCM |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.ujcm.edu.pe:article/341 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.ujcm.edu.pe/index.php/rctd/article/view/341 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Asimetría Pesca Sanciones Sector artesanal Reformas |
| Sumario: | This study examined the equity of the sanctioning regime of Ecuador's Organic Law for the Development of Aquaculture and Fisheries and its impact on the economic viability of the artisanal sector. Using a qualitative methodology that combined regulatory review (Articles 192-229 of the above-mentioned law), 45 sanctioning resolutions (2021–2023), and 30 semi-structured interviews with key actors, a significant punitive asymmetry was detected. The findings indicate that 80% of participants perceive sanctions as disproportionate. Although the nominal fine for the artisanal sector is lower (1–10 SBU), the use of multipliers based on the value of the catch resulted in fines exceeding 300% of the value of their assets in 70% of cases, while for the industrial sector the average sanction was 15%. Eighteen percent (85%) of sanctions affected the artisanal sector, demonstrating a severe differential impact. It is concluded that the regime, with strict application and no prior corrective mechanisms, is counterproductive to sustainability goals. Compared with Chile and Peru’s progressive models, there is an emphasis on the need for reform that incorporates graduality, substantive differentiation, and technical assistance. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).