Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To characterize the predominant attitude in university students of Huancayo on the evaluation of teaching performance. Methods. Research was descriptive substantive type with a mixed approach. An attitude scale towards teacher’s evaluation was made and validated. It was applied to 382 stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Alderete Güere, Ernesto Gustavo, Alania Contreras , Rubén Darío
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad de Huánuco
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.localhost:article/87
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140e
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:evaluación
desempeño docente
exigencia académica
estudiante
universidad.
evaluation
teaching performance
academic requirement
student
university
avaliação
desempenho do ensino
requisitos acadêmicos
estudante
universidade
desempenho acadêmico
id REVUDH_7be3a886cde70902ce574e1828456693
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.localhost:article/87
network_acronym_str REVUDH
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
Evaluación docente y exigencia académica: malas prácticas en educación superior
Avaliação dos professores e exigências acadêmicas: más práticas no ensino superior
title Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
spellingShingle Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
Alderete Güere, Ernesto Gustavo
evaluación
desempeño docente
exigencia académica
estudiante
universidad.
evaluation
teaching performance
academic requirement
student
university
avaliação
desempenho do ensino
requisitos acadêmicos
estudante
universidade
desempenho acadêmico
title_short Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
title_full Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
title_fullStr Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
title_sort Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher Education
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alderete Güere, Ernesto Gustavo
Alania Contreras , Rubén Darío
author Alderete Güere, Ernesto Gustavo
author_facet Alderete Güere, Ernesto Gustavo
Alania Contreras , Rubén Darío
author_role author
author2 Alania Contreras , Rubén Darío
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv evaluación
desempeño docente
exigencia académica
estudiante
universidad.
evaluation
teaching performance
academic requirement
student
university
avaliação
desempenho do ensino
requisitos acadêmicos
estudante
universidade
desempenho acadêmico
topic evaluación
desempeño docente
exigencia académica
estudiante
universidad.
evaluation
teaching performance
academic requirement
student
university
avaliação
desempenho do ensino
requisitos acadêmicos
estudante
universidade
desempenho acadêmico
description Objective. To characterize the predominant attitude in university students of Huancayo on the evaluation of teaching performance. Methods. Research was descriptive substantive type with a mixed approach. An attitude scale towards teacher’s evaluation was made and validated. It was applied to 382 students from Universidad Continental, Universidad Peruana Los Andes and Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú. In addition, qualitative collection of information, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 teachers from the three universities. Results. According to the data obtained, the majority of the students consider that teacher evaluation is not valued (79.6%), that it does not have specific objectives (80%), and that they favor "very nice" teachers (54, 3 %). However, they refer that they learn more from a “demanding teacher” than from a “very nice teacher” (56.6%). Teachers, for their part, agree with the evaluation of their performance, but consider that it does not favor the improvement of teaching-learning and they perceive it as an instrument of control and warning on the part of the students. Conclusion. Students and teachers do not value the evaluation of teacher performance because they perceive that it is carried out without specific strategies and purposes.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140e
url http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140e
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140e/76
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Desafios
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Desafios
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Huánuco UDH
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Huánuco UDH
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Desafios; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Desafíos (ene-jun); 39-47
2307-6100
2706-9559
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
instname:Universidad de Huánuco
instacron:UDH
instname_str Universidad de Huánuco
instacron_str UDH
institution UDH
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
collection Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1830216622794604544
spelling Teacher Evaluation and Academic Demand: Bad Practices in Higher EducationEvaluación docente y exigencia académica: malas prácticas en educación superiorAvaliação dos professores e exigências acadêmicas: más práticas no ensino superiorAlderete Güere, Ernesto GustavoAlania Contreras , Rubén Daríoevaluacióndesempeño docenteexigencia académicaestudianteuniversidad.evaluationteaching performanceacademic requirementstudentuniversityavaliaçãodesempenho do ensinorequisitos acadêmicosestudanteuniversidadedesempenho acadêmicoObjective. To characterize the predominant attitude in university students of Huancayo on the evaluation of teaching performance. Methods. Research was descriptive substantive type with a mixed approach. An attitude scale towards teacher’s evaluation was made and validated. It was applied to 382 students from Universidad Continental, Universidad Peruana Los Andes and Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú. In addition, qualitative collection of information, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 teachers from the three universities. Results. According to the data obtained, the majority of the students consider that teacher evaluation is not valued (79.6%), that it does not have specific objectives (80%), and that they favor "very nice" teachers (54, 3 %). However, they refer that they learn more from a “demanding teacher” than from a “very nice teacher” (56.6%). Teachers, for their part, agree with the evaluation of their performance, but consider that it does not favor the improvement of teaching-learning and they perceive it as an instrument of control and warning on the part of the students. Conclusion. Students and teachers do not value the evaluation of teacher performance because they perceive that it is carried out without specific strategies and purposes.Objetivo. Caracterizar la actitud predominante en los estudiantes universitarios de Huancayo sobre la evaluación del desempeño docente. Métodos. La investigación de enfoque mixto, fue de tipo sustantivo descriptivo. Para la recolección cuantitativa de la información se construyó y validó la escala de actitud hacia la evaluación docente, que fue aplicada a 382 estudiantes de la Universidad Continental, universidad Peruana Los Andes y la Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú. Además, para la recolección cualitativa de la información se realizaron entrevistas a profundidad a 24 docentes de las tres universidades. Resultados. Según los datos obtenidos, la mayoría de los estudiantes consideran que no se da valor a la evaluación docente (79,6 %), que no tiene objetivos concretos (80 %), y que favorecen a los docentes “buena gente” (54,3 %); sin embargo, refieren que se aprende más de un “docente exigente” que de un “docente buena gente” (56,6 %). Los docentes, por su parte están de acuerdo con la evaluación de su desempeño, pero, consideran que no favorece la mejora de la enseñanza aprendizaje y lo perciben como un instrumento de control y advertencia de parte de los estudiantes. Conclusión. Los estudiantes y docentes no dan valor a la evaluación del desempeño docente porque perciben que esta se realiza sin estrategias y propósitos concretos.Objetivo. Caracterizar a atitude predominante dos estudantes universitários em Huancayo em relação à avaliação do desempenho do ensino. Métodos. A pesquisa de abordagem mista foi de um tipo descritivo substantivo. Para a coleta quantitativa de informações, foi construída e validada uma escala de atitudes em relação à avaliação dos professores, que foi aplicada a 382 alunos da Universidad Continental, Universidad Peruana Los Andes e Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú. Além disso, para a coleta de dados qualitativos, foram realizadas entrevistas em profundidade com 24 professores das três universidades. Resultados. Segundo os dados obtidos, a maioria dos estudantes considera que a avaliação do ensino não é valorizada (79,6%), que não tem objetivos concretos (80%) e que favorece os "bons professores" (54,3%); no entanto, dizem que aprendem mais com um "professor exigente" do que com um "bom professor" (56,6%). Os professores, por outro lado, concordam com a avaliação de seu desempenho, mas consideram que isso não favorece a melhoria do ensino e da aprendizagem e o percebem como um instrumento de controle e alerta por parte dos alunos. Conclusão. Estudantes e professores não valorizam a avaliação do desempenho do ensino porque percebem que ele é realizado sem estratégias e propósitos concretos.Universidad de Huánuco UDH2020-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140eDesafios; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Desafíos (ene-jun); 39-472307-61002706-9559reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Huánucoinstname:Universidad de Huánucoinstacron:UDHspahttp://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/140e/76Derechos de autor 2021 Desafioshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.localhost:article/872025-04-11T22:18:25Z
score 13.905282
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).