Cervical funneling as a predictor of successful induction of labor in term pregnancies

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of cervical funneling as a predictor of successfullabor induction in term pregnancies. Design: Case-control study. Institution: HospitalCentral de Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Pregnant women who underwentlabor induction. Methods: Pregnant women were evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo, Mejía-Montilla, Jorly, Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia, Torres-Cepeda, Duly, Rondón-Tapia, Martha, Briceño-Pérez, Carlos
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2692
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2692
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Cervix uteri
induced
prediction
Cuello del útero
trabajo de parto inducido
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of cervical funneling as a predictor of successfullabor induction in term pregnancies. Design: Case-control study. Institution: HospitalCentral de Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Pregnant women who underwentlabor induction. Methods: Pregnant women were evaluated by ultrasound toestablish the presence or absence of cervical tunneling before the start of laborinduction. Main outcome measures: Maternal characteristics, induction-deliveryinterval and type of delivery. Results: A total of 443 pregnant women who underwentinduction or labor were selected. Cervical ultrasound evaluation revealed that 192patients (44.3%) displayed cervical funneling. No statistically significant differenceswere observed between the two groups in general characteristics (p = ns). Inpatients with cervical tunneling, the induction and delivery onset interval was 14.2± 5.5 hours, while in those without it was 16.0 ± 5.0 hours (p = 0.0004). As for modeof delivery, patients with tunneling had 168 deliveries (87.5%) compared to 181deliveries (72.1%) in group B (p < 0.0001). On the other hand, 67 deliveries (34.8%) inthe cervical tunneling group occurred within 12 hours after induction, while patientswithout cervical tunneling recorded 66 deliveries (26.2%) in the same period (p =0.0497). Conclusion: The findings of this investigation suggest that cervical tunnelingis a useful predictor for successful induction of labor in term pregnancies.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).