Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To determine the incidence, associated factors and outcomes of obstetrical hysterectomy. Design: Retrospective, descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study. Setting: Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolome, Lima, Peru. Material: Clinical records of 69 patients who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ramírez Cabrera, Juan, Cabrera Ramos, Santiago, Campos Siccha, Gerardo, Peláez Chomba, Melissa, Poma Morales, Cliford
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/1961
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1961
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_9ce0b2b1d7065627ebd809696cb27653
oai_identifier_str oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/1961
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
Histerectomía obstétrica en el Hospital San Bartolomé, Lima, 2003 – 2015
title Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
spellingShingle Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
Ramírez Cabrera, Juan
title_short Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
title_full Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
title_fullStr Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
title_full_unstemmed Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
title_sort Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ramírez Cabrera, Juan
Cabrera Ramos, Santiago
Campos Siccha, Gerardo
Peláez Chomba, Melissa
Poma Morales, Cliford
author Ramírez Cabrera, Juan
author_facet Ramírez Cabrera, Juan
Cabrera Ramos, Santiago
Campos Siccha, Gerardo
Peláez Chomba, Melissa
Poma Morales, Cliford
author_role author
author2 Cabrera Ramos, Santiago
Campos Siccha, Gerardo
Peláez Chomba, Melissa
Poma Morales, Cliford
author2_role author
author
author
author
description Objectives: To determine the incidence, associated factors and outcomes of obstetrical hysterectomy. Design: Retrospective, descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study. Setting: Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolome, Lima, Peru. Material: Clinical records of 69 patients who underwent obstetrical hysterectomy (OH) performed between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015. Methods: Odds ratio was applied as measure of association, and Excel 2013 and SPSS programs were used for statistical analysis. Main outcome measures: Incidence, associated factors and outcomes of obstetrical hysterectomy. Results: OH rate was 0.69/1 000; 82.6% followed cesarean section delivery (1.94/1 000), OR cesarean section/vaginal delivery was 19.91; 65.2% were multiparous women aged 35 or less, 78.2% with prenatal control. Main diagnoses were placenta previa (27.5%) and previous cesarean section (15.9%). Main indications for OH were uterine atony and placenta accreta (either 39.1%). In 47.8% of the cases, cesarean section-hysterectomy was performed, and supracervical OH represented 55%. Admission to ICU was necessary in 84% of cases, 91.3% needed blood transfusion. Complications during surgery occurred in 18.7%, and 15.9% needed reintervention. No maternal death was reported. Conclusions: In this study, obstetrical hysterectomy had a low incidence (0.69/1 000 obstetrical events), but remained a critical and mutilating circumstance. The risk of obstetrical hysterectomy was 19.9 times higher with cesarean section than with vaginal delivery (OR: 19.9; 95%CI, 8.6-46.2). There was no maternal death in this series.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1961
10.31403/rpgo.v63i1961
url https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1961
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v63i1961
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1961/pdf_430
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 63 No. 1 (2017); 27-33
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 63 Núm. 1 (2017); 27-33
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868078732763201536
spelling Obstetrical hysterectomy at Hospital San Bartolome, Lima, Peru 2003 – 2015Histerectomía obstétrica en el Hospital San Bartolomé, Lima, 2003 – 2015Ramírez Cabrera, JuanCabrera Ramos, SantiagoCampos Siccha, GerardoPeláez Chomba, MelissaPoma Morales, ClifordObjectives: To determine the incidence, associated factors and outcomes of obstetrical hysterectomy. Design: Retrospective, descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study. Setting: Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolome, Lima, Peru. Material: Clinical records of 69 patients who underwent obstetrical hysterectomy (OH) performed between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015. Methods: Odds ratio was applied as measure of association, and Excel 2013 and SPSS programs were used for statistical analysis. Main outcome measures: Incidence, associated factors and outcomes of obstetrical hysterectomy. Results: OH rate was 0.69/1 000; 82.6% followed cesarean section delivery (1.94/1 000), OR cesarean section/vaginal delivery was 19.91; 65.2% were multiparous women aged 35 or less, 78.2% with prenatal control. Main diagnoses were placenta previa (27.5%) and previous cesarean section (15.9%). Main indications for OH were uterine atony and placenta accreta (either 39.1%). In 47.8% of the cases, cesarean section-hysterectomy was performed, and supracervical OH represented 55%. Admission to ICU was necessary in 84% of cases, 91.3% needed blood transfusion. Complications during surgery occurred in 18.7%, and 15.9% needed reintervention. No maternal death was reported. Conclusions: In this study, obstetrical hysterectomy had a low incidence (0.69/1 000 obstetrical events), but remained a critical and mutilating circumstance. The risk of obstetrical hysterectomy was 19.9 times higher with cesarean section than with vaginal delivery (OR: 19.9; 95%CI, 8.6-46.2). There was no maternal death in this series.Objetivos. Determinar la incidencia, factores asociados y repercusiones de la histerectomía obstétrica. Diseño. Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, analítico y transversal. Institución. Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolomé, Lima, Perú. Material. Se analizaron las historias clínicas de 69 pacientes con histerectomía obstétrica (HO) realizadas del 01 de enero 2003 al 31 de diciembre 2015. Metodología. Se utilizó el odds ratio como medida de asociación. El análisis estadístico se realizó en los programas Excel 2013 y SPSS. Principales medidas de resultados. Tasa, factores asociados, indicaciones, complicaciones de la HO. Resultados. La tasa de histerectomía obstétrica fue 0,69/1 000. El 82,6% consistió en parto por cesárea (1,94/1 000), OR cesárea/parto vaginal 19,91. El 65,2% fue realizada en multípara de 35 años o menos de edad, 78,2% con control prenatal. Los diagnósticos principales fueron placenta previa (27,5%) y cesárea anterior (15,9%). Las principales indicaciones clínicas para realizar una HO fueron atonía uterina y acretismo placentario (ambas 39,1%). En 47,8% de los casos se practicó cesárea histerectomía, y la HO supracervical representó el 55%. Ingresó a la unidad de cuidados intensivos el 84%, necesitó transfusión sanguínea el 91,3%. Se reportó complicaciones durante el acto quirúrgico en 18,7%, siendo reintervenida el 15,9%. No hubo muerte materna. Conclusiones. La histerectomía obstétrica (HO), aunque de baja incidencia (0,69/1 000 eventos obstétricos), sigue siendo una circunstancia crítica y mutilante. La cesárea tuvo 19,9 veces más riesgo de histerectomía obstétrica que el parto vaginal (OR: 19,9; IC95%, 8,6 a 46,2). No hubo casos de muerte materna.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2017-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/196110.31403/rpgo.v63i1961The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 63 No. 1 (2017); 27-33Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 63 Núm. 1 (2017); 27-332304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1961/pdf_430info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/19612026-01-12T16:55:39Z
score 13.408945
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).