Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations
Descripción del Articulo
609 sick or is the 27,89% of ginecópatas interned from 1955 to 1959 in our department were carrying PG 554 (90.96%) underwent surgery and 251 of these high amputation were asked neck as a time in the treatment of PG The highest incidence of amputations fall on the PG 111 gr. (53%). The most common a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1216 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVSPOG_6b90d49b55b05d4e9f2e555c81fd0ba9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1216 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSPOG |
| network_name_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| spelling |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operationsCitodiagnóstico y estudio histopatológico de los cuellos amputados en las operaciones de prolapso genitalHerrera Calmet, Abelardo609 sick or is the 27,89% of ginecópatas interned from 1955 to 1959 in our department were carrying PG 554 (90.96%) underwent surgery and 251 of these high amputation were asked neck as a time in the treatment of PG The highest incidence of amputations fall on the PG 111 gr. (53%). The most common age at which amputated neck is between 40-60 years (54%). The operation was carried Manchester operation with 233 cases (93%). The cytodiagnosis was negative in 233 sick in one doubtful and 17 not done them. Histopathological result of the collars was 249 amputees chronic cervicitis and colon cancer, one in situ and one infiltrating, which gives us a 0.86% false negative cytodiagnoses. We believe that these results were due to poor technique in making smear, to insufficient sample or the depth of the cancerous lesion. We are convinced that the cytodiagnosis is a valuable method in the screenings and must be confirmed by biopsy or tapering neck in cases of positive or equivocal results.609 enfermas o sea el 27,89 % del total de ginecópatas internadas de 1955 a 1959 en nuestro servicio, fueron portadoras de P.G. 554 (90,96%) fueron intervenidas quirúrgicamente y a 251 de éstas se les hizo amputación alta del cuello como un tiempo en el tratamiento del P.G. La mayor incidencia de amputaciones recaen sobre los P.G. de 111 gr. (53%). La edad más frecuente en que se amputó el cuello está entre los 40 a 60 años (54 %). La operación más realizada ha sido la operación de Manchester con 233 casos (93 %). El citodiagnóstico fue negativo en 233 enfermas, en uno dudoso y a 17 no se les hizo. El resultado histopatológico de los cuellos amputados fue de 249 cervicitis crónicas y dos cáncer: uno in-situ y uno infiltrante, los que nos da un 0,86 % de citodiagnósticos falsos negativos. Creemos que estos resultados se debieron a mala técnica en la toma del frotis, a muestra insuficiente o a la profundidad de la lesión cancerosa. Estamos convencidos que el citodiagnóstico es un método de gran valor en los despistajes y que debe ser confirmado por la biopsia o conificación del cuello en casos de resultados positivos o dudosos.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 6 No. 3-4 (1960); 242-249Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 6 Núm. 3-4 (1960); 242-2492304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216/1171info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12162015-07-21T17:46:11Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations Citodiagnóstico y estudio histopatológico de los cuellos amputados en las operaciones de prolapso genital |
| title |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| spellingShingle |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations Herrera Calmet, Abelardo |
| title_short |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| title_full |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| title_fullStr |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| title_sort |
Cytodiagnosis and histopathology necks amputees in genital prolapse operations |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Herrera Calmet, Abelardo |
| author |
Herrera Calmet, Abelardo |
| author_facet |
Herrera Calmet, Abelardo |
| author_role |
author |
| description |
609 sick or is the 27,89% of ginecópatas interned from 1955 to 1959 in our department were carrying PG 554 (90.96%) underwent surgery and 251 of these high amputation were asked neck as a time in the treatment of PG The highest incidence of amputations fall on the PG 111 gr. (53%). The most common age at which amputated neck is between 40-60 years (54%). The operation was carried Manchester operation with 233 cases (93%). The cytodiagnosis was negative in 233 sick in one doubtful and 17 not done them. Histopathological result of the collars was 249 amputees chronic cervicitis and colon cancer, one in situ and one infiltrating, which gives us a 0.86% false negative cytodiagnoses. We believe that these results were due to poor technique in making smear, to insufficient sample or the depth of the cancerous lesion. We are convinced that the cytodiagnosis is a valuable method in the screenings and must be confirmed by biopsy or tapering neck in cases of positive or equivocal results. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-06 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216 |
| url |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1216/1171 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 6 No. 3-4 (1960); 242-249 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 6 Núm. 3-4 (1960); 242-249 2304-5132 2304-5124 reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología instacron:SPOG |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| instacron_str |
SPOG |
| institution |
SPOG |
| reponame_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| collection |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1847150809184206848 |
| score |
13.098175 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).