Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To determine incidence, epidemiological and clinical characteristics, and surgical management of patients with diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Design: Descriptive and retrospective study. Institution: Hospital Nacional Docente Materno Infantil (HONADOMANI) San Bartolomé. Participants: Wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Zapata, Betsy, Ramírez, Juan, Pimentel, José, Cabrera, Santiago, Campos, Gerardo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/411
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_23eba04a5d20e7c7967fb92bb353d4c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/411
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
spelling Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancyLa cirugía pélvica y el embarazo ectópico previo en la epidemiología del embarazo ectópicoZapata, BetsyRamírez, JuanPimentel, JoséCabrera, SantiagoCampos, GerardoObjectives: To determine incidence, epidemiological and clinical characteristics, and surgical management of patients with diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Design: Descriptive and retrospective study. Institution: Hospital Nacional Docente Materno Infantil (HONADOMANI) San Bartolomé. Participants: Women with ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Review of medical records of 46 patients with ectopic pregnancy diagnosis in the period May 2013 – April 2014. Main outcome measures: Ectopic pregnancy clinical findings. Results: Incidence of ectopic pregnancy in the 46 patients studied was 0.63% or 1/157 births. Patients were mostly multiparous, 89% 20-40 years old, 37% with 5-7 weeks amenorrhea, 20% with history of ectopic pregnancy, 39% had previous pelvic surgery, 59% presented typical symptomatology (amenorrhea, abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding). Transvaginal ultrasound was performed in all patients and sonographic findings were presence of adnexal mass and free fluid in the posterior fornix; 54% of ectopic pregnancies were complicated; 89% had tubal location. Laparotomy was performed in 48% and pathology confirmation was obtained in other 48%. Conclusions: In the population studied ectopic pregnancy continued being a gynecological and obstetrical emergency, half of them complicated. It should be suspected in cases of previous pelvic surgery and previous ectopic pregnancy. Transvaginal ultrasound was the main diagnostic tool, and surgery the elective procedure.Objetivos: Determinar la incidencia, características epidemiológicas, clínicas y el manejo médico quirúrgico de las pacientes con el diagnóstico de embarazo ectópico. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo. Institución: Hospital Nacional Docente Materno Infantil (HONADOMANI) San Bartolomé Participantes: Mujeres con embarazo ectópico. Métodos: Revisión de 46 historias clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico de embarazo ectópico en el periodo mayo 2013 a abril 2014. Principales medidas de resultados: Características clínicas del embarazo ectópico. Resultados: Se estudió un total de 46 pacientes. La incidencia de embarazo ectópico fue 0,63% o 1/157 partos. La mayoría de las pacientes era multípara; 89% tenía entre 20 y 40 años de edad, 37% tuvo amenorrea de 5 a 7 semanas; había antecedente de embarazo ectópico en 20% y de cirugía pélvica previa en 39%; 59% presentó cuadro clínico típico (amenorrea, dolor abdominal y sangrado vaginal). Se realizó ecografía transvaginal en todas las pacientes; los hallazgos ecográficos más frecuentes fueron presencia de tumoración anexial y líquido libre en el fondo de saco posterior. Se encontró 54% de embarazos ectópicos complicados; 89% tuvo localización tubárica. La cirugía más empleada fue la laparotomía en 48% y se pudo confirmar el diagnóstico en 48%, con anatomía patológica. Conclusiones: El embarazo ectópico en el hospital de referencia sigue siendo causa de emergencia gineco- obstétrica, la mitad de ellos están complicados. Sospecharlo en casos de cirugía pélvica previa y en el embarazo ectópico previo. La ecografía transvaginal fue la principal herramienta diagnóstica y predominó el manejo quirúrgico.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 61 No. 1 (2015); 27-32Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 61 Núm. 1 (2015); 27-322304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411/pdf_38info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4112015-05-11T01:12:46Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
La cirugía pélvica y el embarazo ectópico previo en la epidemiología del embarazo ectópico
title Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
spellingShingle Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
Zapata, Betsy
title_short Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
title_full Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
title_fullStr Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
title_sort Previous pelvic surgery and ectopic pregnancy in the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zapata, Betsy
Ramírez, Juan
Pimentel, José
Cabrera, Santiago
Campos, Gerardo
author Zapata, Betsy
author_facet Zapata, Betsy
Ramírez, Juan
Pimentel, José
Cabrera, Santiago
Campos, Gerardo
author_role author
author2 Ramírez, Juan
Pimentel, José
Cabrera, Santiago
Campos, Gerardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
description Objectives: To determine incidence, epidemiological and clinical characteristics, and surgical management of patients with diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Design: Descriptive and retrospective study. Institution: Hospital Nacional Docente Materno Infantil (HONADOMANI) San Bartolomé. Participants: Women with ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Review of medical records of 46 patients with ectopic pregnancy diagnosis in the period May 2013 – April 2014. Main outcome measures: Ectopic pregnancy clinical findings. Results: Incidence of ectopic pregnancy in the 46 patients studied was 0.63% or 1/157 births. Patients were mostly multiparous, 89% 20-40 years old, 37% with 5-7 weeks amenorrhea, 20% with history of ectopic pregnancy, 39% had previous pelvic surgery, 59% presented typical symptomatology (amenorrhea, abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding). Transvaginal ultrasound was performed in all patients and sonographic findings were presence of adnexal mass and free fluid in the posterior fornix; 54% of ectopic pregnancies were complicated; 89% had tubal location. Laparotomy was performed in 48% and pathology confirmation was obtained in other 48%. Conclusions: In the population studied ectopic pregnancy continued being a gynecological and obstetrical emergency, half of them complicated. It should be suspected in cases of previous pelvic surgery and previous ectopic pregnancy. Transvaginal ultrasound was the main diagnostic tool, and surgery the elective procedure.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/411/pdf_38
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 61 No. 1 (2015); 27-32
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 61 Núm. 1 (2015); 27-32
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846516625491099648
score 13.397899
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).