Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
Descripción del Articulo
Introduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or ele...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1811 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Dolor abdominal crónico ACNES Signo de Carnett Lidocaína Chronic abdominal pain Carnett's sign Lidocaine |
| id |
REVSGP_e0eb0fe5a438ef2e570bb05b2c72f00a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1811 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSGP |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial Comparación de dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett en pacientes con dolor abdominal crónico. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado |
| title |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial Otero Regino, William Dolor abdominal crónico ACNES Signo de Carnett Lidocaína Chronic abdominal pain ACNES Carnett's sign Lidocaine |
| title_short |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_full |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_sort |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Otero Regino, William Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto Otero Parra, Lina Marulanda Fernández, Hernando Sebastián Frías, Juan Cardona González, Julián Otero Ramos, Elder |
| author |
Otero Regino, William |
| author_facet |
Otero Regino, William Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto Otero Parra, Lina Marulanda Fernández, Hernando Sebastián Frías, Juan Cardona González, Julián Otero Ramos, Elder |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto Otero Parra, Lina Marulanda Fernández, Hernando Sebastián Frías, Juan Cardona González, Julián Otero Ramos, Elder |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Dolor abdominal crónico ACNES Signo de Carnett Lidocaína Chronic abdominal pain ACNES Carnett's sign Lidocaine |
| topic |
Dolor abdominal crónico ACNES Signo de Carnett Lidocaína Chronic abdominal pain ACNES Carnett's sign Lidocaine |
| description |
Introduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis. Material and methods: Randomized controlled study. Results: 1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis. Conclusion: The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811 |
| url |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811/1292 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 No. 1 (2025); 8-15 Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2025); 8-15 1609-722X 1022-5129 reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú instname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú instacron:SOCIOGASTRO |
| instname_str |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| instacron_str |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| institution |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| collection |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1863825153431961600 |
| spelling |
Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trialComparación de dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett en pacientes con dolor abdominal crónico. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizadoOtero Regino, WilliamJaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto Otero Parra, LinaMarulanda Fernández, HernandoSebastián Frías, JuanCardona González, JuliánOtero Ramos, ElderDolor abdominal crónicoACNESSigno de CarnettLidocaínaChronic abdominal painACNES Carnett's signLidocaineIntroduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis. Material and methods: Randomized controlled study. Results: 1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis. Conclusion: The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.Introducción: El dolor abdominal crónico (DAC) es un reto en la consulta diaria. La causa más frecuente es el síndrome de atrapamiento del nervio cutáneo anterior (ACNES), cuyo diagnóstico se hace cuando el signo de Carnett es positivo. Hay dos formas de identificar el signo de Carnett: elevando la cabeza y el tronco o elevando las extremidades inferiores. Hasta el momento no se han comparado estas dos formas de buscar el signo de Carnett. Objetivo: Comparar la efectividad de las dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett, evaluar la eficacia de la infiltración de los puntos dolorosos con lidocaína al 2% y estimar el costo de exámenes antes del diagnóstico. Material y métodos: Estudio aleatorizado controlado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1320 pacientes y se asignaron aleatoriamente 660 pacientes al grupo A: elevación de la cabeza y el tronco y 660 al grupo B: elevación de los miembros inferiores. Ambas maniobras fueron similarmente efectivas en identificar el signo de Carnett. La infiltración de los puntos produjo alivio inmediato en la mayoría de los pacientes. Los costos debidos a diferentes estudios antes del diagnóstico definitivo fueron aproximadamente US$ 861 000 (dólares) versus US$ 66,00 que equivaldría al 7,6% de los gastos incurridos por exámenes realizados antes del diagnóstico. Conclusión: Las dos formas de explorar el signo de Carnett tienen eficacia similar. La infiltración con lidocaína al 2% produjo rápida y significativa mejoría del dolor con mínimos efectos colaterales. Desconocer el signo de Carnett aumenta los costos en salud.Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú2025-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 No. 1 (2025); 8-15Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2025); 8-151609-722X1022-5129reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perúinstname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perúinstacron:SOCIOGASTROspahttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811/1292Derechos de autor 2025 William Otero Regino, Gilberto Jaramillo Trujillo, Lina Otero Parra, Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Juan Sebastián Frías, Julián Cardona González, Elder Otero Ramoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/18112025-04-03T01:08:27Z |
| score |
13.455229 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).