Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial

Descripción del Articulo

Introduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or ele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Otero Regino, William, Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto, Otero Parra, Lina, Marulanda Fernández, Hernando, Sebastián Frías, Juan, Cardona González, Julián, Otero Ramos, Elder
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú
Repositorio:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1811
Enlace del recurso:https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Dolor abdominal crónico
ACNES
Signo de Carnett
Lidocaína
Chronic abdominal pain
Carnett's sign
Lidocaine
id REVSGP_e0eb0fe5a438ef2e570bb05b2c72f00a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1811
network_acronym_str REVSGP
network_name_str Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
Comparación de dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett en pacientes con dolor abdominal crónico. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado
title Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
spellingShingle Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
Otero Regino, William
Dolor abdominal crónico
ACNES
Signo de Carnett
Lidocaína
Chronic abdominal pain
ACNES
Carnett's sign
Lidocaine
title_short Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Otero Regino, William
Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto
Otero Parra, Lina
Marulanda Fernández, Hernando
Sebastián Frías, Juan
Cardona González, Julián
Otero Ramos, Elder
author Otero Regino, William
author_facet Otero Regino, William
Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto
Otero Parra, Lina
Marulanda Fernández, Hernando
Sebastián Frías, Juan
Cardona González, Julián
Otero Ramos, Elder
author_role author
author2 Jaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto
Otero Parra, Lina
Marulanda Fernández, Hernando
Sebastián Frías, Juan
Cardona González, Julián
Otero Ramos, Elder
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dolor abdominal crónico
ACNES
Signo de Carnett
Lidocaína
Chronic abdominal pain
ACNES
Carnett's sign
Lidocaine
topic Dolor abdominal crónico
ACNES
Signo de Carnett
Lidocaína
Chronic abdominal pain
ACNES
Carnett's sign
Lidocaine
description Introduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis. Material and methods: Randomized controlled study. Results: 1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis. Conclusion: The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-03-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811
url https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811/1292
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 No. 1 (2025); 8-15
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2025); 8-15
1609-722X
1022-5129
reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú
instname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú
instacron:SOCIOGASTRO
instname_str Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú
instacron_str SOCIOGASTRO
institution SOCIOGASTRO
reponame_str Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú
collection Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1863825153431961600
spelling Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trialComparación de dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett en pacientes con dolor abdominal crónico. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizadoOtero Regino, WilliamJaramillo Trujillo, Gilberto Otero Parra, LinaMarulanda Fernández, HernandoSebastián Frías, JuanCardona González, JuliánOtero Ramos, ElderDolor abdominal crónicoACNESSigno de CarnettLidocaínaChronic abdominal painACNES Carnett's signLidocaineIntroduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis. Material and methods: Randomized controlled study. Results: 1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis. Conclusion: The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.Introducción: El dolor abdominal crónico (DAC) es un reto en la consulta diaria. La causa más frecuente es el síndrome de atrapamiento del nervio cutáneo anterior (ACNES), cuyo diagnóstico se hace cuando el signo de Carnett es positivo. Hay dos formas de identificar el signo de Carnett: elevando la cabeza y el tronco o elevando las extremidades inferiores. Hasta el momento no se han comparado estas dos formas de buscar el signo de Carnett. Objetivo: Comparar la efectividad de las dos maniobras para identificar el signo de Carnett, evaluar la eficacia de la infiltración de los puntos dolorosos con lidocaína al 2% y estimar el costo de exámenes antes del diagnóstico. Material y métodos: Estudio aleatorizado controlado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1320 pacientes y se asignaron aleatoriamente 660 pacientes al grupo A: elevación de la cabeza y el tronco y 660 al grupo B: elevación de los miembros inferiores. Ambas maniobras fueron similarmente efectivas en identificar el signo de Carnett. La infiltración de los puntos produjo alivio inmediato en la mayoría de los pacientes. Los costos debidos a diferentes estudios antes del diagnóstico definitivo fueron aproximadamente US$ 861 000 (dólares) versus US$ 66,00 que equivaldría al 7,6% de los gastos incurridos por exámenes realizados antes del diagnóstico. Conclusión: Las dos formas de explorar el signo de Carnett tienen eficacia similar. La infiltración con lidocaína al 2% produjo rápida y significativa mejoría del dolor con mínimos efectos colaterales. Desconocer el signo de Carnett aumenta los costos en salud.Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú2025-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 No. 1 (2025); 8-15Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2025); 8-151609-722X1022-5129reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perúinstname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perúinstacron:SOCIOGASTROspahttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1811/1292Derechos de autor 2025 William Otero Regino, Gilberto Jaramillo Trujillo, Lina Otero Parra, Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Juan Sebastián Frías, Julián Cardona González, Elder Otero Ramoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/18112025-04-03T01:08:27Z
score 13.455229
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).