Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature
Descripción del Articulo
Colonoscopy screening is an effective method to prevent colon cancer through the detection of polyps on which colon cancer develops in a higher percentage; however, the detection of these lesions varies in the different segments of the colon and the detection rate of them in the right colon is usual...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
| Institución: | Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1507 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Colon ascendente Colonoscopia Tamizaje Colon, ascending Colonoscopy Screening |
| id |
REVSGP_4e67fa70238d432f2bf8648db1c817a2 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/1507 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSGP |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature Doble revisión de colon derecho vs revisión simple durante la colonoscopia para la detección de pólipos y adenomas de colon: revisión sistemática de la literatura |
| title |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| spellingShingle |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature Daza Castro, Erlison Mauricio Colon ascendente Colonoscopia Tamizaje Colon, ascending Colonoscopy Screening |
| title_short |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| title_full |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| title_fullStr |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| title_sort |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Daza Castro, Erlison Mauricio Torres López, Alberto Ramon Aponte, Diego Rocha Rodríguez, Jose Nicolas Sabbagh, Luis Carlos |
| author |
Daza Castro, Erlison Mauricio |
| author_facet |
Daza Castro, Erlison Mauricio Torres López, Alberto Ramon Aponte, Diego Rocha Rodríguez, Jose Nicolas Sabbagh, Luis Carlos |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Torres López, Alberto Ramon Aponte, Diego Rocha Rodríguez, Jose Nicolas Sabbagh, Luis Carlos |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Colon ascendente Colonoscopia Tamizaje Colon, ascending Colonoscopy Screening |
| topic |
Colon ascendente Colonoscopia Tamizaje Colon, ascending Colonoscopy Screening |
| description |
Colonoscopy screening is an effective method to prevent colon cancer through the detection of polyps on which colon cancer develops in a higher percentage; however, the detection of these lesions varies in the different segments of the colon and the detection rate of them in the right colon is usually lower. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether double endoscopic revision of the right colon during colonoscopy is a mechanism to improve its performance in terms of polyp detection rate (TDP) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Materials and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature including randomized clinical trials that evaluated repeat right-sight examination by colonoscopy compared to standard view to improve detection of polyps and adenomas. The protocol for this decision was published in PROSPERO under the code CRD42022356509. Results: Five studies involving 2729 participants were included. Polyp detection was reported in 585/1197 patients (48.87%) after the second review, compared with 537/1206 (44.52%) of patients who received a single examination (p< 0.05), for a combined RR of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.97-1.23) (I2 was 44%). Detection of adenomas was reported in 830/1513 patients (54.75%) after the second review, compared with 779/1509 (51.62%) of patients who received a single examination (p < 0.05), for a combined RR of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.00-1.13) (I2 was 0%). Conclusion: Second examination of the right colon by colonoscopy may have a modest improvement in the detection of polyps and adenomas. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-20 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507 |
| url |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507/1208 https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507/1224 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2023); 309-318 Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2023); 309-318 1609-722X 1022-5129 reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú instname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú instacron:SOCIOGASTRO |
| instname_str |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| instacron_str |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| institution |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| collection |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1863825152390725632 |
| spelling |
Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literatureDoble revisión de colon derecho vs revisión simple durante la colonoscopia para la detección de pólipos y adenomas de colon: revisión sistemática de la literaturaDaza Castro, Erlison MauricioTorres López, Alberto RamonAponte, DiegoRocha Rodríguez, Jose NicolasSabbagh, Luis CarlosColon ascendenteColonoscopiaTamizajeColon, ascendingColonoscopyScreening Colonoscopy screening is an effective method to prevent colon cancer through the detection of polyps on which colon cancer develops in a higher percentage; however, the detection of these lesions varies in the different segments of the colon and the detection rate of them in the right colon is usually lower. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether double endoscopic revision of the right colon during colonoscopy is a mechanism to improve its performance in terms of polyp detection rate (TDP) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Materials and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature including randomized clinical trials that evaluated repeat right-sight examination by colonoscopy compared to standard view to improve detection of polyps and adenomas. The protocol for this decision was published in PROSPERO under the code CRD42022356509. Results: Five studies involving 2729 participants were included. Polyp detection was reported in 585/1197 patients (48.87%) after the second review, compared with 537/1206 (44.52%) of patients who received a single examination (p< 0.05), for a combined RR of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.97-1.23) (I2 was 44%). Detection of adenomas was reported in 830/1513 patients (54.75%) after the second review, compared with 779/1509 (51.62%) of patients who received a single examination (p < 0.05), for a combined RR of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.00-1.13) (I2 was 0%). Conclusion: Second examination of the right colon by colonoscopy may have a modest improvement in the detection of polyps and adenomas. El tamizaje por colonoscopia es un método efectivo para prevenir cáncer de colon a traves de la deteccion de polipos sobre los cuales se desarrolla en un mayor porcentaje el cancer de colon; sin embargo la deteccion de estas lesiones varia en los diferentes segmentos del colon y de ellos en colon derecho su tasa detección suele ser menor. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar si la doble revisión endoscópica de colon derecho durante la colonoscopia es un mecanismo para mejorar su rendimiento en cuanto a la tasa de detección de pólipos (TDP) y la tasa de detección de adenomas (TDA). Materiales y métodos: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de la literatura de estudios clínicos aleatorizados que realizaron una doble revisión del colon derecho por colonoscopia comparado con una revisión simple para mejorar la detección de pólipos y adenomas. El protocolo de esta revisión se publicó en PROSPERO bajo el código CRD42022356509. Resultados: Se incluyeron 5 estudios que incluyeron 2729 participantes. Se informó la detección de pólipos en 585/1197 pacientes (48,87%) después de la segunda revisión, en comparación con 537/1206 (44,52%) de los pacientes que recibieron una única examinación (p < 0.05), para un RR combinado de 1,09 (IC 95%: 0,97-1,23) (I2 fue de 44%). Se informó la detección de adenomas en 830/1513 pacientes (54,75%) después de la segunda revisión, en comparación con 779/1509 (51,62%) de los pacientes que recibieron una única examinación (p < 0,05), para un RR combinado de 1,06 (IC 95%: 1,00-1,13) (I2 fue de 0%). Conclusión: La segunda examinación del colon derecho por colonoscopia puede tener una modesta mejoría en la detección de pólipos y adenomas. Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú2023-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2023); 309-318Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2023); 309-3181609-722X1022-5129reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perúinstname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perúinstacron:SOCIOGASTROspahttps://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507/1208https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1507/1224Derechos de autor 2023 Erlison Mauricio Daza Castro, Alberto Ramon Torres López, Diego Aponte, Jose Nicolas Rocha Rodríguez, Luis Carlos Sabbaghhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/15072024-01-12T15:42:51Z |
| score |
13.136178 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).