A metaethically based position on abortion and the concept of human dignity
Descripción del Articulo
A common problem in moral discourse is the risk of incurring in infinite regressions. This, together with other criticisms also directed at scientific disciplines, motivated the sceptical attitude towards morality advised by several postmodern theories. The response of both moral philosophy and scie...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/23087 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23087 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Teoría del discurso Aborto Dignidad Teoría de las capacidades Postmodernismo Escepticismo Racionalidad Kant Alexy Discourse theory Abortion Dignity Theory of capacities Postmodernism Skepticism Rationality |
Sumario: | A common problem in moral discourse is the risk of incurring in infinite regressions. This, together with other criticisms also directed at scientific disciplines, motivated the sceptical attitude towards morality advised by several postmodern theories. The response of both moral philosophy and science was similar: to reaffirm the possibility of reaching agreements of “truth” or “correction” through rational discussion, which in turn implies a regulated procedure to submit theories to questioning in the freest possible way. In this paper the author intends to delineate some elements of rational discourse that are characteristically used in practical discourse, and then apply them to a discussion of abortion. The central purpose of this research consists in contributing to the analysis of the justifiability of the idea that the fetus can have dignity. This discussion implies first identifying a theory of dignity that appropriately satisfies the demand for universality of all rational discourse, and then applying it to some of the usual arguments in the abortion debate. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).