Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon

Descripción del Articulo

This article analyzes the evolution of the natural resources tenure inthe Peruvian Amazon, and its relation with the indigenous protest ofthe years 2008 and 2009. The authoress argue that during the indigenousprotest aroused two opposite visions of development: the visionof the government supporting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Benavides, Margarita
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2010
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/1394
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/1394
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Resources tenure
Indigenous protest
Consultation
Peruvian Amazon.
Tenencia de recursos
Protesta indígena
Recursos
Amazonía peruana
id REVPUCP_d2eac0b7a2c6083163b4e0d9c3202f87
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/1394
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian AmazonIndustrias extractivas, protesta indígena y consulta en la Amazonía peruanaBenavides, MargaritaResources tenureIndigenous protestConsultationPeruvian Amazon.Tenencia de recursosProtesta indígenaRecursosAmazonía peruanaThis article analyzes the evolution of the natural resources tenure inthe Peruvian Amazon, and its relation with the indigenous protest ofthe years 2008 and 2009. The authoress argue that during the indigenousprotest aroused two opposite visions of development: the visionof the government supporting the big capital interests in one side,and the vision of the indigenous peoples defending their territoriesas a source of their material and identity survival. Nevertheless, theAwajún and Wampis suffered the disproportional repression of thegovernment in Bagua, with bloody results, the main four decreesthat were in the origin of the protest, because they threatened thejuridical security of indigenous peoples territories were derogated,and the indigenous peoples right to be consulted, established by theConvention 169 of the International Law Organization, was placed inthe center of the national debate. Nevertheless, the government hasresisted its application, because these consultations would imply aseries of socio environmental conditionings to the extractive industriesand the big scale infrastructure constructions. The authoresssustains that the conflict will continue if public policies in favor ofindigenous peoples would not be developed. For the establishmentof these public policies another vision of development is requiredfrom the State and government.Este artículo analiza la evolución de la tenencia de recursos en laAmazonía peruana y la relaciona con la protesta indígena de losaños 2008 y 2009. A través de este análisis, se plantea que existendos visiones de desarrollo contrapuestas: la del gobierno y el grancapital por un lado, y la de los pueblos indígenas por el otro. Si biendurante la protesta el gobierno reprimió desproporcionadamentea los indígenas especialmente en Bagua, con lamentables cruentosresultados, el derecho de los pueblos indígenas a la consulta, basadoen el Convenio 169 de la OIT, quedó colocado en el debate nacional.Sin embargo, el gobierno ha mostrado gran resistencia parareconocerlo, pues esta consulta implicaría una serie de restriccionessocioambientales a la forma en que se desarrollan las industriasextractivas y las grandes obras de infraestructura en la Amazonía.Se sostiene que el conflicto continuará si no se desarrollan políticaspúblicas en favor de los pueblos indígenas. Para que estas se dense requiere, a su vez, de una visión diferente de desarrollo desde elEstado y el Gobierno.El análisis de la tenencia de recursos en la Amazonía se basaprincipalmente en información del Sistema de Información sobreComunidades Nativas, base de datos georreferenciada manejada porel Instituto del Bien Común. Asimismo, el artículo basa su análisisen bibliografía secundaria y en el seguimiento a los acontecimientospor la autora, como especialista en el tema.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2010-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/139410.18800/anthropologica.2010-sup.017Anthropologica; Vol. 28 Núm. 28 (2010): Suplemento 1. Especial sobre Industrias extractivas y sociedad rural; 263-2872224-64280254-9212reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/1394/1344info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/13942020-03-05T20:47:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
Industrias extractivas, protesta indígena y consulta en la Amazonía peruana
title Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
spellingShingle Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
Benavides, Margarita
Resources tenure
Indigenous protest
Consultation
Peruvian Amazon.
Tenencia de recursos
Protesta indígena
Recursos
Amazonía peruana
title_short Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
title_full Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
title_fullStr Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
title_sort Extractive industries, indigenous peoples protest and consultation inthe Peruvian Amazon
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Benavides, Margarita
author Benavides, Margarita
author_facet Benavides, Margarita
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Resources tenure
Indigenous protest
Consultation
Peruvian Amazon.
Tenencia de recursos
Protesta indígena
Recursos
Amazonía peruana
topic Resources tenure
Indigenous protest
Consultation
Peruvian Amazon.
Tenencia de recursos
Protesta indígena
Recursos
Amazonía peruana
description This article analyzes the evolution of the natural resources tenure inthe Peruvian Amazon, and its relation with the indigenous protest ofthe years 2008 and 2009. The authoress argue that during the indigenousprotest aroused two opposite visions of development: the visionof the government supporting the big capital interests in one side,and the vision of the indigenous peoples defending their territoriesas a source of their material and identity survival. Nevertheless, theAwajún and Wampis suffered the disproportional repression of thegovernment in Bagua, with bloody results, the main four decreesthat were in the origin of the protest, because they threatened thejuridical security of indigenous peoples territories were derogated,and the indigenous peoples right to be consulted, established by theConvention 169 of the International Law Organization, was placed inthe center of the national debate. Nevertheless, the government hasresisted its application, because these consultations would imply aseries of socio environmental conditionings to the extractive industriesand the big scale infrastructure constructions. The authoresssustains that the conflict will continue if public policies in favor ofindigenous peoples would not be developed. For the establishmentof these public policies another vision of development is requiredfrom the State and government.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-03-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/1394
10.18800/anthropologica.2010-sup.017
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/1394
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/anthropologica.2010-sup.017
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/1394/1344
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anthropologica; Vol. 28 Núm. 28 (2010): Suplemento 1. Especial sobre Industrias extractivas y sociedad rural; 263-287
2224-6428
0254-9212
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900193431584768
score 13.386405
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).