Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union
Descripción del Articulo
The Court of Justice confirmed early that the principle of an effective remedy is a general principle of EU law. With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the foundation of case law turned to the Article 47 of the Charter, detecting progresses which sug...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22714 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Derecho a la Tutela Judicial Efectiva Artículo 47 CDFUE Principios de Efectividad y Equivalencia Derecho Constitucional Unión Europea Derecho Procesal Right to an Effective Remedy Article 47 EUCFR Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence Constitutional Law European Union Procedural Law |
| id |
REVPUCP_cd9c23e6399f45fb02682542c96451f3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22714 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European UnionEvolución y parámetros constitucionales del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva en la Unión EuropeaAgudo González, JorgeDerecho a la Tutela Judicial EfectivaArtículo 47 CDFUEPrincipios de Efectividad y EquivalenciaDerecho ConstitucionalUnión EuropeaDerecho ProcesalRight to an Effective RemedyArticle 47 EUCFRPrinciples of Effectiveness and EquivalenceConstitutional LawEuropean UnionProcedural LawThe Court of Justice confirmed early that the principle of an effective remedy is a general principle of EU law. With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the foundation of case law turned to the Article 47 of the Charter, detecting progresses which suggest that the Court has assumed the task of conferring to said precept the effectiveness and the proper content that the protection of the rights recognized by EU law demands. In this paper we will expose the argumentative lines to which the Court has resorted to support the aforementioned fundamental right. Secondly, the common legal bases of these case law lines will be revealed, trying to show that there have not been qualitative differences that prevent to pose a unitary configuration of a same and unique right. Lastly, the intention is to define the content of this right with an integrative interpretation. This aim will show that the efficacy and content of the right have had an evolution that converges in similar fundamental parameters. Those parameters are materialized in levels of protection that, in general terms, are potentially more demanding than those derived from national constitutions.El Tribunal de Justicia confirmó tempranamente que la tutela judicial efectiva es un principio general del Derecho comunitario. Con la entrada en vigor del Tratado de Lisboa y de la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea es cada vez más frecuente la fundamentación directa de la jurisprudencia en el artículo 47 de la Carta, detectándose progresos que sugieren que el Tribunal ha asumido la tarea de dotar a dicho precepto de la eficacia y del contenido propio que reclama la tutela de los derechos reconocidos por el ordenamiento comunitario. En este estudio expondremos las líneas argumentativas a las que ha recurrido el Tribunal para fundamentar el citado derecho fundamental. En segundo lugar, se indaga sobre las bases jurídicas comunes de esas corrientes jurisprudenciales, tratando de mostrar que no existen diferencias cualitativas que impidan confluir en una configuración unitaria de un mismo y único derecho. Por último, se pretende definir el contenido de ese derecho con una interpretación integradora que muestre que la eficacia y el contenido del derecho ha tenido una evolución que confluye en parámetros iusfundamentales semejantes, y que, además, se plasman en niveles de protección que, en términos generales, son potencialmente más exigentes que los derivados de las Constituciones nacionales.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714IUS ET VERITAS; No. 60 (2020); 66-85IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 60 (2020); 66-85IUS ET VERITAS; No. 60 (2020); 66-85IUS ET VERITAS; N. 60 (2020); 66-85IUS ET VERITAS; n. 60 (2020); 66-851995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714/21842http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714/21967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/227142020-09-18T01:18:08Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union Evolución y parámetros constitucionales del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva en la Unión Europea |
| title |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| spellingShingle |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union Agudo González, Jorge Derecho a la Tutela Judicial Efectiva Artículo 47 CDFUE Principios de Efectividad y Equivalencia Derecho Constitucional Unión Europea Derecho Procesal Right to an Effective Remedy Article 47 EUCFR Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence Constitutional Law European Union Procedural Law |
| title_short |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| title_full |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| title_fullStr |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| title_sort |
Evolution and constitutional limits of the right to an effective remedy in the European Union |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Agudo González, Jorge |
| author |
Agudo González, Jorge |
| author_facet |
Agudo González, Jorge |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho a la Tutela Judicial Efectiva Artículo 47 CDFUE Principios de Efectividad y Equivalencia Derecho Constitucional Unión Europea Derecho Procesal Right to an Effective Remedy Article 47 EUCFR Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence Constitutional Law European Union Procedural Law |
| topic |
Derecho a la Tutela Judicial Efectiva Artículo 47 CDFUE Principios de Efectividad y Equivalencia Derecho Constitucional Unión Europea Derecho Procesal Right to an Effective Remedy Article 47 EUCFR Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence Constitutional Law European Union Procedural Law |
| description |
The Court of Justice confirmed early that the principle of an effective remedy is a general principle of EU law. With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the foundation of case law turned to the Article 47 of the Charter, detecting progresses which suggest that the Court has assumed the task of conferring to said precept the effectiveness and the proper content that the protection of the rights recognized by EU law demands. In this paper we will expose the argumentative lines to which the Court has resorted to support the aforementioned fundamental right. Secondly, the common legal bases of these case law lines will be revealed, trying to show that there have not been qualitative differences that prevent to pose a unitary configuration of a same and unique right. Lastly, the intention is to define the content of this right with an integrative interpretation. This aim will show that the efficacy and content of the right have had an evolution that converges in similar fundamental parameters. Those parameters are materialized in levels of protection that, in general terms, are potentially more demanding than those derived from national constitutions. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-17 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714 |
| url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714/21842 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22714/21967 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/epub+zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 60 (2020); 66-85 IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 60 (2020); 66-85 IUS ET VERITAS; No. 60 (2020); 66-85 IUS ET VERITAS; N. 60 (2020); 66-85 IUS ET VERITAS; n. 60 (2020); 66-85 1995-2929 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
| instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PUCP |
| institution |
PUCP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1845975147271421952 |
| score |
13.057226 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
