Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy

Descripción del Articulo

There are several judgments of the Constitutional Court that have marked important precedents.These precedents contain a normative element, which determines the jurisdictional action in a great number of future acses.In this article, the author develops how the judgment of the case Vásquez Romero ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Cruces Burga, Alberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19821
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Precedent
Constitutional Court
constitutional process
Substantially equal cases
Precedente
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso constitucional
casos sustancialmente iguales
id REVPUCP_cae11c6e49af15cc79fda39194b25335
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19821
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedyPrecedentes sin precedente: los casos sustancialmente iguales como causal de rechazo de los recursos de agravio constitucionalCruces Burga, AlbertoPrecedentConstitutional Courtconstitutional processSubstantially equal casesPrecedenteTribunal Constitucionalproceso constitucionalcasos sustancialmente igualesThere are several judgments of the Constitutional Court that have marked important precedents.These precedents contain a normative element, which determines the jurisdictional action in a great number of future acses.In this article, the author develops how the judgment of the case Vásquez Romero has set a precedent of great importance regarding access to the Constitutional Court. The author will analyze the impact of this precedent on the grounds for rejection of the constitutional grievance remedies as they are substantially equal cases.Son diversas las sentencias del Tribunal Constitucional que han marcado importantes precedentes. Dichos precedentes contienen un elemento normativo, lo que determina la actuación jurisdiccional en un gran número de casos futuros.En el presente artículo, el autor desarrolla como la sentencia del caso Vásquez Romero ha marcado un precedente de gran importancia respecto del acceso al Tribunal Constitucional. La autora analizará el impacto de dicho precedente en la causal de rechazo de los recursos de agravio constitucional por tratarse de casos sustancialmente iguales.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2017-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 71 (2017): Derecho procesal y arbitraje; 183-1931810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821/19867Derechos de autor 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derechohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/198212020-03-13T13:30:43Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
Precedentes sin precedente: los casos sustancialmente iguales como causal de rechazo de los recursos de agravio constitucional
title Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
spellingShingle Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
Cruces Burga, Alberto
Precedent
Constitutional Court
constitutional process
Substantially equal cases
Precedente
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso constitucional
casos sustancialmente iguales
title_short Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
title_full Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
title_fullStr Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
title_full_unstemmed Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
title_sort Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cruces Burga, Alberto
author Cruces Burga, Alberto
author_facet Cruces Burga, Alberto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Precedent
Constitutional Court
constitutional process
Substantially equal cases
Precedente
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso constitucional
casos sustancialmente iguales
topic Precedent
Constitutional Court
constitutional process
Substantially equal cases
Precedente
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso constitucional
casos sustancialmente iguales
description There are several judgments of the Constitutional Court that have marked important precedents.These precedents contain a normative element, which determines the jurisdictional action in a great number of future acses.In this article, the author develops how the judgment of the case Vásquez Romero has set a precedent of great importance regarding access to the Constitutional Court. The author will analyze the impact of this precedent on the grounds for rejection of the constitutional grievance remedies as they are substantially equal cases.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/19821/19867
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 71 (2017): Derecho procesal y arbitraje; 183-193
1810-9934
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847243910280118272
score 13.136109
Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares