Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music

Descripción del Articulo

This paper reconstructs the place of music in the division of the arts proposed by Kant in his third Critique, focusing on the aspects that make music an art difficult to characterise. For this purpose, it exposes the foundations that allow situating music at the highest levels of Kant’s in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pascual, Luciano
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/26325
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/26325
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Music
Kant
Division of arts
Música
División de las artes
id REVPUCP_c8b324a10eefc50c9754651b6b6eff57
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/26325
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in MusicLa estética de Kant y el problema del juicio estético en la músicaPascual, LucianoMusicKantDivision of artsMúsicaKantDivisión de las artesThis paper reconstructs the place of music in the division of the arts proposed by Kant in his third Critique, focusing on the aspects that make music an art difficult to characterise. For this purpose, it exposes the foundations that allow situating music at the highest levels of Kant’s incipient system of the arts, as well as the reasons that allow placing it on the lowest ones. In addition, the paper approaches the problem of the pendular place of music as a beautiful art and as an agreeable art, recovering and contrasting different passages of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. To complement this last aim, readings from different thinkers are reviewed, considering, on the one hand, those who claim that Kant characterises music as a beautiful art, and, on the other hand, those who claim that he characterises it as a mere agreeable art. Finally, this paper presents the conclusions that allow to understand that music’s double possibility, as a beautiful and as agreeable art, depends on the ways in which the subject relates to music.En este trabajo reconstruimos el lugar de la música en la división de las artes propuesto por Kant en su tercera crítica, deteniéndonos en los aspectos que la vuelven un arte complejo de caracterizar. Para este objetivo expondremos los fundamentos que permiten ubicar a la música en los lugares más elevados de su incipiente sistema de las artes, como también aquellas razones que permiten encontrarla dentro de los más bajos. Además, abordamos el problema del lugar pendular de la música como arte bello y como arte agradable, recuperando y contrastando diversos pasajes de su Crítica de la facultad de juzgar. Para complementar este último objetivo, recuperamos lecturas de diferentes pensadoras y pensadores encontrando, por un lado, a quienes consideran que Kant caracteriza a la música como arte bello, y por otro, a quienes consideran que la caracteriza como mero arte agradable. Finalmente presentamos las conclusiones que permiten comprender que su doble posibilidad, como arte bello y agradable, depende de las formas en las que el sujeto se vincula con la música.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades2022-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/2632510.18800/arete.202202.007Areté; Vol. 34 Núm. 2 (2022); 455-4702223-37411016-913Xreponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/26325/24844https://creativecommons.rg/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/263252023-07-17T14:42:45Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
La estética de Kant y el problema del juicio estético en la música
title Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
spellingShingle Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
Pascual, Luciano
Music
Kant
Division of arts
Música
Kant
División de las artes
title_short Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
title_full Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
title_fullStr Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
title_full_unstemmed Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
title_sort Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Aesthetic Judgement in Music
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pascual, Luciano
author Pascual, Luciano
author_facet Pascual, Luciano
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Music
Kant
Division of arts
Música
Kant
División de las artes
topic Music
Kant
Division of arts
Música
Kant
División de las artes
description This paper reconstructs the place of music in the division of the arts proposed by Kant in his third Critique, focusing on the aspects that make music an art difficult to characterise. For this purpose, it exposes the foundations that allow situating music at the highest levels of Kant’s incipient system of the arts, as well as the reasons that allow placing it on the lowest ones. In addition, the paper approaches the problem of the pendular place of music as a beautiful art and as an agreeable art, recovering and contrasting different passages of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. To complement this last aim, readings from different thinkers are reviewed, considering, on the one hand, those who claim that Kant characterises music as a beautiful art, and, on the other hand, those who claim that he characterises it as a mere agreeable art. Finally, this paper presents the conclusions that allow to understand that music’s double possibility, as a beautiful and as agreeable art, depends on the ways in which the subject relates to music.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/26325
10.18800/arete.202202.007
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/26325
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/arete.202202.007
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/26325/24844
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.rg/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.rg/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Areté; Vol. 34 Núm. 2 (2022); 455-470
2223-3741
1016-913X
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900495427764224
score 12.873224
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).